Cargando…

Medical complexity and time to lung cancer treatment – a three-year retrospective chart review

BACKGROUND: The time from a referral for suspected lung cancer is received at a hospital until treatment start has been defined as a quality indicator. Current Norwegian recommendation is that ≥70% should start surgery or radiotherapy within 42 calendar days and systemic therapy within 35 days. Howe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stokstad, Trine, Sørhaug, Sveinung, Amundsen, Tore, Grønberg, Bjørn H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5240346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28095840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1952-y
_version_ 1782496051452706816
author Stokstad, Trine
Sørhaug, Sveinung
Amundsen, Tore
Grønberg, Bjørn H.
author_facet Stokstad, Trine
Sørhaug, Sveinung
Amundsen, Tore
Grønberg, Bjørn H.
author_sort Stokstad, Trine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The time from a referral for suspected lung cancer is received at a hospital until treatment start has been defined as a quality indicator. Current Norwegian recommendation is that ≥70% should start surgery or radiotherapy within 42 calendar days and systemic therapy within 35 days. However, delays can occur due to medical complexity. The aim of this study was to quantify the proportion of patients who started treatment within the recommended timeframes; and to assess the proportion of non-complex patients for which there were no good reasons for delays. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients diagnosed with lung cancer at a university hospital during 2011–2013. We defined “non-complex” patients as those who underwent ≤1 tissue diagnostic procedure and had no delays due to comorbidity, intercurrent disease or complications to diagnostic procedures (“Medical delays”) of more than three days. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-nine cases were analyzed; 142 (32%) had >1 tissue diagnostic procedures; 67 (15%) had medical delays >3 days; 262 (58%) were non-complex and 363 (81%) received treatment for lung cancer. Median number of days until surgery or radiotherapy was 48 (overall) and 41 (non-complex patients). The proportions who started surgery or radiotherapy within 42 days were 41% (overall) and 56% (non-complex). Corresponding numbers for systemic therapy were 29 days (overall) and 25 days (non-complex), and 64% (overall) and 80% (non-complex). CONCLUSION: Fewer lung cancer patients than desired started treatment within the recommended timeframes. Even among the least complex patients, too few patients received timely treatment. The reasons need to be identified and understood, and changes in the organization appear to be necessary in order to offer timely treatment to more patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1952-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5240346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52403462017-01-19 Medical complexity and time to lung cancer treatment – a three-year retrospective chart review Stokstad, Trine Sørhaug, Sveinung Amundsen, Tore Grønberg, Bjørn H. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The time from a referral for suspected lung cancer is received at a hospital until treatment start has been defined as a quality indicator. Current Norwegian recommendation is that ≥70% should start surgery or radiotherapy within 42 calendar days and systemic therapy within 35 days. However, delays can occur due to medical complexity. The aim of this study was to quantify the proportion of patients who started treatment within the recommended timeframes; and to assess the proportion of non-complex patients for which there were no good reasons for delays. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients diagnosed with lung cancer at a university hospital during 2011–2013. We defined “non-complex” patients as those who underwent ≤1 tissue diagnostic procedure and had no delays due to comorbidity, intercurrent disease or complications to diagnostic procedures (“Medical delays”) of more than three days. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-nine cases were analyzed; 142 (32%) had >1 tissue diagnostic procedures; 67 (15%) had medical delays >3 days; 262 (58%) were non-complex and 363 (81%) received treatment for lung cancer. Median number of days until surgery or radiotherapy was 48 (overall) and 41 (non-complex patients). The proportions who started surgery or radiotherapy within 42 days were 41% (overall) and 56% (non-complex). Corresponding numbers for systemic therapy were 29 days (overall) and 25 days (non-complex), and 64% (overall) and 80% (non-complex). CONCLUSION: Fewer lung cancer patients than desired started treatment within the recommended timeframes. Even among the least complex patients, too few patients received timely treatment. The reasons need to be identified and understood, and changes in the organization appear to be necessary in order to offer timely treatment to more patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1952-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5240346/ /pubmed/28095840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1952-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stokstad, Trine
Sørhaug, Sveinung
Amundsen, Tore
Grønberg, Bjørn H.
Medical complexity and time to lung cancer treatment – a three-year retrospective chart review
title Medical complexity and time to lung cancer treatment – a three-year retrospective chart review
title_full Medical complexity and time to lung cancer treatment – a three-year retrospective chart review
title_fullStr Medical complexity and time to lung cancer treatment – a three-year retrospective chart review
title_full_unstemmed Medical complexity and time to lung cancer treatment – a three-year retrospective chart review
title_short Medical complexity and time to lung cancer treatment – a three-year retrospective chart review
title_sort medical complexity and time to lung cancer treatment – a three-year retrospective chart review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5240346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28095840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1952-y
work_keys_str_mv AT stokstadtrine medicalcomplexityandtimetolungcancertreatmentathreeyearretrospectivechartreview
AT sørhaugsveinung medicalcomplexityandtimetolungcancertreatmentathreeyearretrospectivechartreview
AT amundsentore medicalcomplexityandtimetolungcancertreatmentathreeyearretrospectivechartreview
AT grønbergbjørnh medicalcomplexityandtimetolungcancertreatmentathreeyearretrospectivechartreview