Cargando…
Challenges in conducting natural experiments in parks—lessons from the REVAMP study
ABSTRACT: Experimental evidence on the role of the built environment for promoting physical activity is important for informing how to create cities that promote active living. Parks provide opportunities for physical activity; however, there is little robust evidence on the impact of park refurbish...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5240380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28095861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0460-0 |
_version_ | 1782496058911227904 |
---|---|
author | Veitch, Jenny Salmon, Jo Giles-Corti, Billie Crawford, David Dullaghan, Kate Carver, Alison Timperio, Anna |
author_facet | Veitch, Jenny Salmon, Jo Giles-Corti, Billie Crawford, David Dullaghan, Kate Carver, Alison Timperio, Anna |
author_sort | Veitch, Jenny |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: Experimental evidence on the role of the built environment for promoting physical activity is important for informing how to create cities that promote active living. Parks provide opportunities for physical activity; however, there is little robust evidence on the impact of park refurbishment. Government agencies often modify parks, providing opportunities for natural experiment studies of these interventions. Such an opportunity was provided by the modification of a large park in Victoria, Australia in 2013 when the Recording and EValuating Activity in a Modified Park (REVAMP) study was established. Based on insights from the REVAMP study, this paper discusses challenges involved in conducting natural experiments in park settings, focussing on issues that may help design more effective future evaluations of the impact of park refurbishment. Natural experiments offer unique opportunities to evaluate the impact of large-scale changes to the built environment. They provide valuable data that might not otherwise be possible to gather, because of the costs associated with modification of the environment. However, factors beyond the control of the study team contribute to the complexity of both organising and conducting natural experiments, with potential flow-on effects to the quality of data. Therefore many extraneous factors need to be considered when designing, costing and conducting natural experiments; studies should identify opportunities to include key partners from the inception of the project, be flexible yet robust, and allow sufficient funding to accommodate unexpected changes in the research protocol. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trial ISRCTN50745547, registration date 11.1.2014 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5240380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52403802017-01-19 Challenges in conducting natural experiments in parks—lessons from the REVAMP study Veitch, Jenny Salmon, Jo Giles-Corti, Billie Crawford, David Dullaghan, Kate Carver, Alison Timperio, Anna Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Debate ABSTRACT: Experimental evidence on the role of the built environment for promoting physical activity is important for informing how to create cities that promote active living. Parks provide opportunities for physical activity; however, there is little robust evidence on the impact of park refurbishment. Government agencies often modify parks, providing opportunities for natural experiment studies of these interventions. Such an opportunity was provided by the modification of a large park in Victoria, Australia in 2013 when the Recording and EValuating Activity in a Modified Park (REVAMP) study was established. Based on insights from the REVAMP study, this paper discusses challenges involved in conducting natural experiments in park settings, focussing on issues that may help design more effective future evaluations of the impact of park refurbishment. Natural experiments offer unique opportunities to evaluate the impact of large-scale changes to the built environment. They provide valuable data that might not otherwise be possible to gather, because of the costs associated with modification of the environment. However, factors beyond the control of the study team contribute to the complexity of both organising and conducting natural experiments, with potential flow-on effects to the quality of data. Therefore many extraneous factors need to be considered when designing, costing and conducting natural experiments; studies should identify opportunities to include key partners from the inception of the project, be flexible yet robust, and allow sufficient funding to accommodate unexpected changes in the research protocol. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trial ISRCTN50745547, registration date 11.1.2014 BioMed Central 2017-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5240380/ /pubmed/28095861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0460-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Debate Veitch, Jenny Salmon, Jo Giles-Corti, Billie Crawford, David Dullaghan, Kate Carver, Alison Timperio, Anna Challenges in conducting natural experiments in parks—lessons from the REVAMP study |
title | Challenges in conducting natural experiments in parks—lessons from the REVAMP study |
title_full | Challenges in conducting natural experiments in parks—lessons from the REVAMP study |
title_fullStr | Challenges in conducting natural experiments in parks—lessons from the REVAMP study |
title_full_unstemmed | Challenges in conducting natural experiments in parks—lessons from the REVAMP study |
title_short | Challenges in conducting natural experiments in parks—lessons from the REVAMP study |
title_sort | challenges in conducting natural experiments in parks—lessons from the revamp study |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5240380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28095861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0460-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT veitchjenny challengesinconductingnaturalexperimentsinparkslessonsfromtherevampstudy AT salmonjo challengesinconductingnaturalexperimentsinparkslessonsfromtherevampstudy AT gilescortibillie challengesinconductingnaturalexperimentsinparkslessonsfromtherevampstudy AT crawforddavid challengesinconductingnaturalexperimentsinparkslessonsfromtherevampstudy AT dullaghankate challengesinconductingnaturalexperimentsinparkslessonsfromtherevampstudy AT carveralison challengesinconductingnaturalexperimentsinparkslessonsfromtherevampstudy AT timperioanna challengesinconductingnaturalexperimentsinparkslessonsfromtherevampstudy |