Cargando…
Weighing as a stand-alone intervention does not reduce excessive gestational weight gain compared to routine antenatal care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
BACKGROUND: Excessive gestational weight gain is associated with short and long-term adverse maternal and infant health outcomes, independent of pre-pregnancy body mass index. Weighing pregnant women as a stand-alone intervention during antenatal visits is suggested to reduce pregnancy weight gain....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5240423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28095821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1207-2 |
_version_ | 1782496067918495744 |
---|---|
author | Fealy, Shanna M. Taylor, Rachael M. Foureur, Maralyn Attia, John Ebert, Lyn Bisquera, Alessandra Hure, Alexis J. |
author_facet | Fealy, Shanna M. Taylor, Rachael M. Foureur, Maralyn Attia, John Ebert, Lyn Bisquera, Alessandra Hure, Alexis J. |
author_sort | Fealy, Shanna M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Excessive gestational weight gain is associated with short and long-term adverse maternal and infant health outcomes, independent of pre-pregnancy body mass index. Weighing pregnant women as a stand-alone intervention during antenatal visits is suggested to reduce pregnancy weight gain. In the absence of effective interventions to reduce excessive gestational gain within the real world setting, this study aims to test if routine weighing as a stand-alone intervention can reduce total pregnancy weight gain and, in particular, excessive gestational weight gain. METHODS: A systematic review and meta–analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted between November 2014 and January 2016, and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Seven databases were searched. A priori eligibility criteria were applied to published literature by at least two independent reviewers. Studies considered methodologically rigorous, as per the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Criteria Checklist for Primary Research, were included. Meta-analysis was conducted using fixed-effects models. RESULTS: A total of 5223 (non-duplicated) records were screened, resulting in two RCTs that were pooled for meta-analysis (n = 1068 randomised participants; n = 538 intervention, n = 534 control). No difference in total weight gain per week was observed between intervention and control groups (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.00 kg/week, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.03 to 0.02). There was also no reduction in excessive gestational weight gain between intervention and control, according to pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI). However, total weight gain was lower in underweight women (n = 23, BMI <18.5 kg/m(2)) in the intervention compared to control group (−0.12 kg/week, 95% CI −0.23 to −0.01). No significant differences were observed for other pregnancy, birth and infant outcomes. CONCLUSION: Weighing as a stand-alone intervention is not worse nor better at reducing excessive gestational weight gain than routine antenatal care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1207-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5240423 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52404232017-01-23 Weighing as a stand-alone intervention does not reduce excessive gestational weight gain compared to routine antenatal care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Fealy, Shanna M. Taylor, Rachael M. Foureur, Maralyn Attia, John Ebert, Lyn Bisquera, Alessandra Hure, Alexis J. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Excessive gestational weight gain is associated with short and long-term adverse maternal and infant health outcomes, independent of pre-pregnancy body mass index. Weighing pregnant women as a stand-alone intervention during antenatal visits is suggested to reduce pregnancy weight gain. In the absence of effective interventions to reduce excessive gestational gain within the real world setting, this study aims to test if routine weighing as a stand-alone intervention can reduce total pregnancy weight gain and, in particular, excessive gestational weight gain. METHODS: A systematic review and meta–analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted between November 2014 and January 2016, and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Seven databases were searched. A priori eligibility criteria were applied to published literature by at least two independent reviewers. Studies considered methodologically rigorous, as per the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Criteria Checklist for Primary Research, were included. Meta-analysis was conducted using fixed-effects models. RESULTS: A total of 5223 (non-duplicated) records were screened, resulting in two RCTs that were pooled for meta-analysis (n = 1068 randomised participants; n = 538 intervention, n = 534 control). No difference in total weight gain per week was observed between intervention and control groups (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.00 kg/week, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.03 to 0.02). There was also no reduction in excessive gestational weight gain between intervention and control, according to pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI). However, total weight gain was lower in underweight women (n = 23, BMI <18.5 kg/m(2)) in the intervention compared to control group (−0.12 kg/week, 95% CI −0.23 to −0.01). No significant differences were observed for other pregnancy, birth and infant outcomes. CONCLUSION: Weighing as a stand-alone intervention is not worse nor better at reducing excessive gestational weight gain than routine antenatal care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1207-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5240423/ /pubmed/28095821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1207-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fealy, Shanna M. Taylor, Rachael M. Foureur, Maralyn Attia, John Ebert, Lyn Bisquera, Alessandra Hure, Alexis J. Weighing as a stand-alone intervention does not reduce excessive gestational weight gain compared to routine antenatal care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title | Weighing as a stand-alone intervention does not reduce excessive gestational weight gain compared to routine antenatal care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_full | Weighing as a stand-alone intervention does not reduce excessive gestational weight gain compared to routine antenatal care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Weighing as a stand-alone intervention does not reduce excessive gestational weight gain compared to routine antenatal care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Weighing as a stand-alone intervention does not reduce excessive gestational weight gain compared to routine antenatal care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_short | Weighing as a stand-alone intervention does not reduce excessive gestational weight gain compared to routine antenatal care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_sort | weighing as a stand-alone intervention does not reduce excessive gestational weight gain compared to routine antenatal care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5240423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28095821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1207-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fealyshannam weighingasastandaloneinterventiondoesnotreduceexcessivegestationalweightgaincomparedtoroutineantenatalcareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT taylorrachaelm weighingasastandaloneinterventiondoesnotreduceexcessivegestationalweightgaincomparedtoroutineantenatalcareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT foureurmaralyn weighingasastandaloneinterventiondoesnotreduceexcessivegestationalweightgaincomparedtoroutineantenatalcareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT attiajohn weighingasastandaloneinterventiondoesnotreduceexcessivegestationalweightgaincomparedtoroutineantenatalcareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT ebertlyn weighingasastandaloneinterventiondoesnotreduceexcessivegestationalweightgaincomparedtoroutineantenatalcareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT bisqueraalessandra weighingasastandaloneinterventiondoesnotreduceexcessivegestationalweightgaincomparedtoroutineantenatalcareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT hurealexisj weighingasastandaloneinterventiondoesnotreduceexcessivegestationalweightgaincomparedtoroutineantenatalcareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials |