Cargando…
Validity of a PCR assay in CSF for the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the validity of a PCR assay in CSF for the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis (NC). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective case-control study, recruiting participants from 5 hospitals in Cuenca, Ecuador, from January 2015 to February 2016. Cases fulfilled...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5241005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28105460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000324 |
_version_ | 1782496137373024256 |
---|---|
author | Carpio, Arturo Campoverde, Alfredo Romo, Matthew L. García, Lorena Piedra, Luis M. Pacurucu, Mónica López, Nelson Aguilar, Jenner López, Sebastian Vintimilla, Luis C. Toral, Ana M. Peña-Tapia, Pablo |
author_facet | Carpio, Arturo Campoverde, Alfredo Romo, Matthew L. García, Lorena Piedra, Luis M. Pacurucu, Mónica López, Nelson Aguilar, Jenner López, Sebastian Vintimilla, Luis C. Toral, Ana M. Peña-Tapia, Pablo |
author_sort | Carpio, Arturo |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the validity of a PCR assay in CSF for the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis (NC). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective case-control study, recruiting participants from 5 hospitals in Cuenca, Ecuador, from January 2015 to February 2016. Cases fulfilled validated diagnostic criteria for NC. For each case, a neurosurgical patient who did not fulfill the diagnostic criteria for NC was selected as a control. CT and MRI, as well as a CSF sample, were collected from both cases and controls. The diagnostic criteria to identify cases were used as a reference standard. RESULTS: Overall, 36 case and 36 control participants were enrolled. PCR had a sensitivity of 72.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 54.8%–85.8%) and a specificity of 100.0% (95% CI 90.3%–100.0%). For parenchymal NC, PCR had a sensitivity of 42.9% (95% CI 17.7%–71.1%), and for extraparenchymal NC, PCR had a sensitivity of 90.9% (95% CI 70.8%–98.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the usefulness of this PCR assay in CSF for the diagnosis of NC. PCR may be particularly helpful for diagnosing extraparenchymal NC when neuroimaging techniques have failed. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that CSF PCR can accurately identify patients with extraparenchymal NC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5241005 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52410052017-01-19 Validity of a PCR assay in CSF for the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis Carpio, Arturo Campoverde, Alfredo Romo, Matthew L. García, Lorena Piedra, Luis M. Pacurucu, Mónica López, Nelson Aguilar, Jenner López, Sebastian Vintimilla, Luis C. Toral, Ana M. Peña-Tapia, Pablo Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Article OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the validity of a PCR assay in CSF for the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis (NC). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective case-control study, recruiting participants from 5 hospitals in Cuenca, Ecuador, from January 2015 to February 2016. Cases fulfilled validated diagnostic criteria for NC. For each case, a neurosurgical patient who did not fulfill the diagnostic criteria for NC was selected as a control. CT and MRI, as well as a CSF sample, were collected from both cases and controls. The diagnostic criteria to identify cases were used as a reference standard. RESULTS: Overall, 36 case and 36 control participants were enrolled. PCR had a sensitivity of 72.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 54.8%–85.8%) and a specificity of 100.0% (95% CI 90.3%–100.0%). For parenchymal NC, PCR had a sensitivity of 42.9% (95% CI 17.7%–71.1%), and for extraparenchymal NC, PCR had a sensitivity of 90.9% (95% CI 70.8%–98.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the usefulness of this PCR assay in CSF for the diagnosis of NC. PCR may be particularly helpful for diagnosing extraparenchymal NC when neuroimaging techniques have failed. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that CSF PCR can accurately identify patients with extraparenchymal NC. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5241005/ /pubmed/28105460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000324 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Article Carpio, Arturo Campoverde, Alfredo Romo, Matthew L. García, Lorena Piedra, Luis M. Pacurucu, Mónica López, Nelson Aguilar, Jenner López, Sebastian Vintimilla, Luis C. Toral, Ana M. Peña-Tapia, Pablo Validity of a PCR assay in CSF for the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis |
title | Validity of a PCR assay in CSF for the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis |
title_full | Validity of a PCR assay in CSF for the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis |
title_fullStr | Validity of a PCR assay in CSF for the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of a PCR assay in CSF for the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis |
title_short | Validity of a PCR assay in CSF for the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis |
title_sort | validity of a pcr assay in csf for the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5241005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28105460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000324 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carpioarturo validityofapcrassayincsfforthediagnosisofneurocysticercosis AT campoverdealfredo validityofapcrassayincsfforthediagnosisofneurocysticercosis AT romomatthewl validityofapcrassayincsfforthediagnosisofneurocysticercosis AT garcialorena validityofapcrassayincsfforthediagnosisofneurocysticercosis AT piedraluism validityofapcrassayincsfforthediagnosisofneurocysticercosis AT pacurucumonica validityofapcrassayincsfforthediagnosisofneurocysticercosis AT lopeznelson validityofapcrassayincsfforthediagnosisofneurocysticercosis AT aguilarjenner validityofapcrassayincsfforthediagnosisofneurocysticercosis AT lopezsebastian validityofapcrassayincsfforthediagnosisofneurocysticercosis AT vintimillaluisc validityofapcrassayincsfforthediagnosisofneurocysticercosis AT toralanam validityofapcrassayincsfforthediagnosisofneurocysticercosis AT penatapiapablo validityofapcrassayincsfforthediagnosisofneurocysticercosis |