Cargando…

Impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with renal function impairment

AIM: To investigate the role of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in evaluating patients with renal function impairment (RFI) showing: (1) acute renal failure (ARF) of suspicious vascular origin; or (2) suspicious renal lesions. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients addressed to CEUS over...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Girometti, Rossano, Stocca, Tiziano, Serena, Elena, Granata, Antonio, Bertolotto, Michele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5241536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28144402
http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v9.i1.10
_version_ 1782496202184458240
author Girometti, Rossano
Stocca, Tiziano
Serena, Elena
Granata, Antonio
Bertolotto, Michele
author_facet Girometti, Rossano
Stocca, Tiziano
Serena, Elena
Granata, Antonio
Bertolotto, Michele
author_sort Girometti, Rossano
collection PubMed
description AIM: To investigate the role of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in evaluating patients with renal function impairment (RFI) showing: (1) acute renal failure (ARF) of suspicious vascular origin; or (2) suspicious renal lesions. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients addressed to CEUS over an eight years period to rule-out vascular causes of ARF (first group of 50 subjects) or assess previously found suspicious renal lesions (second group of 41 subjects with acute or chronic RFI). After preliminary grey-scale and color Doppler investigation, each kidney was investigated individually with CEUS, using 1.2-2.4 mL of a sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent. Image analysis was performed in consensus by two readers who reviewed digital clips of CEUS. We calculated the detection rate of vascular abnormalities in the first group and performed descriptive statistics of imaging findings for the second group. RESULTS: In the first group, CEUS detected renal infarction or cortical ischemia in 18/50 patients (36%; 95%CI: 23.3-50.9) and 1/50 patients (2%; 95%CI: 0.1-12), respectively. The detection rate of infarction was significantly higher (P = 0.0002; McNemar test) compared to color Doppler ultrasonography (10%). No vascular causes of ARF were identified in the remaining 31/50 patients (62%). In the second group, CEUS detected 41 lesions on 39 patients, allowing differentiation between solid lesions (21/41; 51.2%) vs complex cysts (20/41; 48.8%), and properly addressing 15/39 patients to intervention when feasible based on clinical conditions (surgery and cryoablation in 13 and 2 cases, respectively). Cysts were categorized Bosniak II, IIF, III and IV in 8, 5, 4 and 3 cases, respectively. In the remaining two patients, CEUS found 1 pseudolesion and 1 subcapsular hematoma. CONCLUSION: CEUS showed high detection rate of renal perfusion abnormalities in patients with ARF, influencing the management of patients with acute or chronic RFI and renal masses throughout their proper characterization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5241536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52415362017-02-01 Impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with renal function impairment Girometti, Rossano Stocca, Tiziano Serena, Elena Granata, Antonio Bertolotto, Michele World J Radiol Retrospective Study AIM: To investigate the role of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in evaluating patients with renal function impairment (RFI) showing: (1) acute renal failure (ARF) of suspicious vascular origin; or (2) suspicious renal lesions. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients addressed to CEUS over an eight years period to rule-out vascular causes of ARF (first group of 50 subjects) or assess previously found suspicious renal lesions (second group of 41 subjects with acute or chronic RFI). After preliminary grey-scale and color Doppler investigation, each kidney was investigated individually with CEUS, using 1.2-2.4 mL of a sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent. Image analysis was performed in consensus by two readers who reviewed digital clips of CEUS. We calculated the detection rate of vascular abnormalities in the first group and performed descriptive statistics of imaging findings for the second group. RESULTS: In the first group, CEUS detected renal infarction or cortical ischemia in 18/50 patients (36%; 95%CI: 23.3-50.9) and 1/50 patients (2%; 95%CI: 0.1-12), respectively. The detection rate of infarction was significantly higher (P = 0.0002; McNemar test) compared to color Doppler ultrasonography (10%). No vascular causes of ARF were identified in the remaining 31/50 patients (62%). In the second group, CEUS detected 41 lesions on 39 patients, allowing differentiation between solid lesions (21/41; 51.2%) vs complex cysts (20/41; 48.8%), and properly addressing 15/39 patients to intervention when feasible based on clinical conditions (surgery and cryoablation in 13 and 2 cases, respectively). Cysts were categorized Bosniak II, IIF, III and IV in 8, 5, 4 and 3 cases, respectively. In the remaining two patients, CEUS found 1 pseudolesion and 1 subcapsular hematoma. CONCLUSION: CEUS showed high detection rate of renal perfusion abnormalities in patients with ARF, influencing the management of patients with acute or chronic RFI and renal masses throughout their proper characterization. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-01-28 2017-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5241536/ /pubmed/28144402 http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v9.i1.10 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Girometti, Rossano
Stocca, Tiziano
Serena, Elena
Granata, Antonio
Bertolotto, Michele
Impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with renal function impairment
title Impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with renal function impairment
title_full Impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with renal function impairment
title_fullStr Impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with renal function impairment
title_full_unstemmed Impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with renal function impairment
title_short Impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with renal function impairment
title_sort impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with renal function impairment
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5241536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28144402
http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v9.i1.10
work_keys_str_mv AT giromettirossano impactofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinpatientswithrenalfunctionimpairment
AT stoccatiziano impactofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinpatientswithrenalfunctionimpairment
AT serenaelena impactofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinpatientswithrenalfunctionimpairment
AT granataantonio impactofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinpatientswithrenalfunctionimpairment
AT bertolottomichele impactofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinpatientswithrenalfunctionimpairment