Cargando…

Distance, rurality and the need for care: access to health services in South West England

BACKGROUND: This paper explores the geographical accessibility of health services in urban and rural areas of the South West of England, comparing two measures of geographical access and characterising the areas most remote from hospitals. Straight-line distance and drive-time to the nearest general...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jordan, Hannah, Roderick, Paul, Martin, David, Barnett, Sarah
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC524184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15456514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-3-21
_version_ 1782121887658147840
author Jordan, Hannah
Roderick, Paul
Martin, David
Barnett, Sarah
author_facet Jordan, Hannah
Roderick, Paul
Martin, David
Barnett, Sarah
author_sort Jordan, Hannah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This paper explores the geographical accessibility of health services in urban and rural areas of the South West of England, comparing two measures of geographical access and characterising the areas most remote from hospitals. Straight-line distance and drive-time to the nearest general practice (GP) and acute hospital (DGH) were calculated for postcodes and aggregated to 1991 Census wards. The correlation between the two measures was used to identify wards where straight-line distance was not an accurate predictor of drive-time. Wards over 25 km from a DGH were classified as 'remote', and characterised in terms of rurality, deprivation, age structure and health status of the population. RESULTS: The access measures were highly correlated (r(2)>0.93). The greatest differences were found in coastal and rural wards of the far South West. Median straight-line distance to GPs was 1 km (IQR = 0.6–2 km) and to DGHs, 12 km (IQR = 5–19 km). Deprivation and rates of premature limiting long term illness were raised in areas most distant from hospitals, but there was no evidence of higher premature mortality rates. Half of the wards remote from a DGH were not classed as rural by the Office for National Statistics. Almost a quarter of households in the wards furthest from hospitals had no car, and the proportion of households with access to two or more cars fell in the most remote areas. CONCLUSION: Drive-time is a more accurate measure of access for peripheral and rural areas. Geographical access to health services, especially GPs, is good, but remoteness affects both rural and urban areas: studies concentrating purely on rural areas may underestimate geographical barriers to accessing health care. A sizeable minority of households still had no car in 1991, and few had more than one car, particularly in areas very close to and very distant from hospitals. Better measures of geographical access, which integrate public and private transport availability with distance and travel time, are required if an accurate reflection of the experience those without their own transport is to be obtained.
format Text
id pubmed-524184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-5241842004-10-24 Distance, rurality and the need for care: access to health services in South West England Jordan, Hannah Roderick, Paul Martin, David Barnett, Sarah Int J Health Geogr Research BACKGROUND: This paper explores the geographical accessibility of health services in urban and rural areas of the South West of England, comparing two measures of geographical access and characterising the areas most remote from hospitals. Straight-line distance and drive-time to the nearest general practice (GP) and acute hospital (DGH) were calculated for postcodes and aggregated to 1991 Census wards. The correlation between the two measures was used to identify wards where straight-line distance was not an accurate predictor of drive-time. Wards over 25 km from a DGH were classified as 'remote', and characterised in terms of rurality, deprivation, age structure and health status of the population. RESULTS: The access measures were highly correlated (r(2)>0.93). The greatest differences were found in coastal and rural wards of the far South West. Median straight-line distance to GPs was 1 km (IQR = 0.6–2 km) and to DGHs, 12 km (IQR = 5–19 km). Deprivation and rates of premature limiting long term illness were raised in areas most distant from hospitals, but there was no evidence of higher premature mortality rates. Half of the wards remote from a DGH were not classed as rural by the Office for National Statistics. Almost a quarter of households in the wards furthest from hospitals had no car, and the proportion of households with access to two or more cars fell in the most remote areas. CONCLUSION: Drive-time is a more accurate measure of access for peripheral and rural areas. Geographical access to health services, especially GPs, is good, but remoteness affects both rural and urban areas: studies concentrating purely on rural areas may underestimate geographical barriers to accessing health care. A sizeable minority of households still had no car in 1991, and few had more than one car, particularly in areas very close to and very distant from hospitals. Better measures of geographical access, which integrate public and private transport availability with distance and travel time, are required if an accurate reflection of the experience those without their own transport is to be obtained. BioMed Central 2004-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC524184/ /pubmed/15456514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-3-21 Text en Copyright © 2004 Jordan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Jordan, Hannah
Roderick, Paul
Martin, David
Barnett, Sarah
Distance, rurality and the need for care: access to health services in South West England
title Distance, rurality and the need for care: access to health services in South West England
title_full Distance, rurality and the need for care: access to health services in South West England
title_fullStr Distance, rurality and the need for care: access to health services in South West England
title_full_unstemmed Distance, rurality and the need for care: access to health services in South West England
title_short Distance, rurality and the need for care: access to health services in South West England
title_sort distance, rurality and the need for care: access to health services in south west england
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC524184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15456514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-3-21
work_keys_str_mv AT jordanhannah distanceruralityandtheneedforcareaccesstohealthservicesinsouthwestengland
AT roderickpaul distanceruralityandtheneedforcareaccesstohealthservicesinsouthwestengland
AT martindavid distanceruralityandtheneedforcareaccesstohealthservicesinsouthwestengland
AT barnettsarah distanceruralityandtheneedforcareaccesstohealthservicesinsouthwestengland