Cargando…
Preoperative lipiodol marking and its role on survival and complication rates of CT-guided cryoablation for small renal masses
BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy for small renal masses (SRM) may be useful for preserving renal function, but is technically more difficult than radical nephrectomy. Cryoablation may be performed under local anesthesia. The objective of the present study is to assess the safety and therapeutic effic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5241976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28100214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0199-1 |
_version_ | 1782496274048614400 |
---|---|
author | Hongo, Fumiya Yamada, Yasuhiro Ueda, Takashi Nakmura, Terukazu Naya, Yoshio Kamoi, Kazumi Okihara, Koji Ichijo, Yusuke Miki, Tsuneharu Yamada, Kei Ukimura, Osamu |
author_facet | Hongo, Fumiya Yamada, Yasuhiro Ueda, Takashi Nakmura, Terukazu Naya, Yoshio Kamoi, Kazumi Okihara, Koji Ichijo, Yusuke Miki, Tsuneharu Yamada, Kei Ukimura, Osamu |
author_sort | Hongo, Fumiya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy for small renal masses (SRM) may be useful for preserving renal function, but is technically more difficult than radical nephrectomy. Cryoablation may be performed under local anesthesia. The objective of the present study is to assess the safety and therapeutic efficacy of cryoablation with lipiodol marking for SRM. METHODS: Cryoablation therapy was performed on 42 patients under local anesthesia. Their median age was 74 years (31–91). The median tumor diameter was 21 mm (10–42). Responses to the treatment were evaluated using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) by contrast-enhanced CT. In six patients (14.3%) for whom it was not possible to use contrast medium, plain CT findings were assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). RESULTS: Twenty-nine (69%) and five (12%) patients achieved complete responses (CR) and partial responses (PR), respectively, while four (10%) and four (10%) patients each had stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) after the first course of therapy. A second course of cryoablation therapy with lipiodol marking was performed on three out of four patients with PD after the first course of therapy, and resulted in a total of 32 patients achieving CR (76%). Four (36.4%) out of 11 patients for whom lipiodol marking was not conducted had PD, whereas none of the 31 patients for whom lipiodol marking was conducted had PD. All grade complications were reported in 11 (24.4%) patients while grade 3 in two (4.4%) patients. 11 (24.4%) A significant difference was observed in postoperative hemorrhagic events in all grades (18% in patients undergoing cryoablation without lipiodol marking vs. 0% in patients undergoing cryoablation without lipiodol marking). CONCLUSIONS: Although further studies involving more patients are needed in order to evaluate long-term results, cryoablation therapy appears to be a useful treatment option for SRM. Preoperative marking with lipiodol was helpful for improving complication and survival rates with cryoablation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5241976 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52419762017-01-23 Preoperative lipiodol marking and its role on survival and complication rates of CT-guided cryoablation for small renal masses Hongo, Fumiya Yamada, Yasuhiro Ueda, Takashi Nakmura, Terukazu Naya, Yoshio Kamoi, Kazumi Okihara, Koji Ichijo, Yusuke Miki, Tsuneharu Yamada, Kei Ukimura, Osamu BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy for small renal masses (SRM) may be useful for preserving renal function, but is technically more difficult than radical nephrectomy. Cryoablation may be performed under local anesthesia. The objective of the present study is to assess the safety and therapeutic efficacy of cryoablation with lipiodol marking for SRM. METHODS: Cryoablation therapy was performed on 42 patients under local anesthesia. Their median age was 74 years (31–91). The median tumor diameter was 21 mm (10–42). Responses to the treatment were evaluated using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) by contrast-enhanced CT. In six patients (14.3%) for whom it was not possible to use contrast medium, plain CT findings were assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). RESULTS: Twenty-nine (69%) and five (12%) patients achieved complete responses (CR) and partial responses (PR), respectively, while four (10%) and four (10%) patients each had stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) after the first course of therapy. A second course of cryoablation therapy with lipiodol marking was performed on three out of four patients with PD after the first course of therapy, and resulted in a total of 32 patients achieving CR (76%). Four (36.4%) out of 11 patients for whom lipiodol marking was not conducted had PD, whereas none of the 31 patients for whom lipiodol marking was conducted had PD. All grade complications were reported in 11 (24.4%) patients while grade 3 in two (4.4%) patients. 11 (24.4%) A significant difference was observed in postoperative hemorrhagic events in all grades (18% in patients undergoing cryoablation without lipiodol marking vs. 0% in patients undergoing cryoablation without lipiodol marking). CONCLUSIONS: Although further studies involving more patients are needed in order to evaluate long-term results, cryoablation therapy appears to be a useful treatment option for SRM. Preoperative marking with lipiodol was helpful for improving complication and survival rates with cryoablation. BioMed Central 2017-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5241976/ /pubmed/28100214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0199-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hongo, Fumiya Yamada, Yasuhiro Ueda, Takashi Nakmura, Terukazu Naya, Yoshio Kamoi, Kazumi Okihara, Koji Ichijo, Yusuke Miki, Tsuneharu Yamada, Kei Ukimura, Osamu Preoperative lipiodol marking and its role on survival and complication rates of CT-guided cryoablation for small renal masses |
title | Preoperative lipiodol marking and its role on survival and complication rates of CT-guided cryoablation for small renal masses |
title_full | Preoperative lipiodol marking and its role on survival and complication rates of CT-guided cryoablation for small renal masses |
title_fullStr | Preoperative lipiodol marking and its role on survival and complication rates of CT-guided cryoablation for small renal masses |
title_full_unstemmed | Preoperative lipiodol marking and its role on survival and complication rates of CT-guided cryoablation for small renal masses |
title_short | Preoperative lipiodol marking and its role on survival and complication rates of CT-guided cryoablation for small renal masses |
title_sort | preoperative lipiodol marking and its role on survival and complication rates of ct-guided cryoablation for small renal masses |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5241976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28100214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0199-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongofumiya preoperativelipiodolmarkinganditsroleonsurvivalandcomplicationratesofctguidedcryoablationforsmallrenalmasses AT yamadayasuhiro preoperativelipiodolmarkinganditsroleonsurvivalandcomplicationratesofctguidedcryoablationforsmallrenalmasses AT uedatakashi preoperativelipiodolmarkinganditsroleonsurvivalandcomplicationratesofctguidedcryoablationforsmallrenalmasses AT nakmuraterukazu preoperativelipiodolmarkinganditsroleonsurvivalandcomplicationratesofctguidedcryoablationforsmallrenalmasses AT nayayoshio preoperativelipiodolmarkinganditsroleonsurvivalandcomplicationratesofctguidedcryoablationforsmallrenalmasses AT kamoikazumi preoperativelipiodolmarkinganditsroleonsurvivalandcomplicationratesofctguidedcryoablationforsmallrenalmasses AT okiharakoji preoperativelipiodolmarkinganditsroleonsurvivalandcomplicationratesofctguidedcryoablationforsmallrenalmasses AT ichijoyusuke preoperativelipiodolmarkinganditsroleonsurvivalandcomplicationratesofctguidedcryoablationforsmallrenalmasses AT mikitsuneharu preoperativelipiodolmarkinganditsroleonsurvivalandcomplicationratesofctguidedcryoablationforsmallrenalmasses AT yamadakei preoperativelipiodolmarkinganditsroleonsurvivalandcomplicationratesofctguidedcryoablationforsmallrenalmasses AT ukimuraosamu preoperativelipiodolmarkinganditsroleonsurvivalandcomplicationratesofctguidedcryoablationforsmallrenalmasses |