Cargando…

A systematic review of experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice

BACKGROUND: Despite efforts to achieve conceptual clarity, advanced practice nursing continues to reside in a liminal space, unable to secure ongoing recognition as a viable means of healthcare delivery. This is particularly evident in general practice where advanced practice role development is mor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jakimowicz, Michael, Williams, Danielle, Stankiewicz, Grazyna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5241982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28115913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0198-7
_version_ 1782496275372965888
author Jakimowicz, Michael
Williams, Danielle
Stankiewicz, Grazyna
author_facet Jakimowicz, Michael
Williams, Danielle
Stankiewicz, Grazyna
author_sort Jakimowicz, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite efforts to achieve conceptual clarity, advanced practice nursing continues to reside in a liminal space, unable to secure ongoing recognition as a viable means of healthcare delivery. This is particularly evident in general practice where advanced practice role development is more fluid and generally less supported by the hierarchical structures evident in the hospital system. This review synthesises published qualitative studies reporting experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice. The panoramic view provided by patients, nurses and doctors within this novel context, offers a fresh perspective on why advanced practice nurses have struggled to gain acceptance within the healthcare milieu. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies that explored the experiences of patients, nurses and doctors who had contact with advanced practice nurses working in general practice. Published work from 1990 to June 2016 was located using CINAHL and PubMed. The full text of relevant studies was retrieved after reading the title and abstract. Critical appraisal was undertaken and the findings of included studies were analysed using the constant comparative method. Emergent codes were collapsed into sub-themes and themes. RESULTS: Twenty articles reporting the experiences of 486 participants were included. We identified one major theme: legitimacy; and three sub-themes: (1) establishing and maintaining confidence in the advanced practice nurse, (2) strengthening and weakening boundaries between general practitioners and advanced practice nurses and (3) establishing and maintaining the value of advanced practice nursing. CONCLUSIONS: We set out to describe experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice. We discovered that general practitioners and patients continue to have concerns around responsibility, trust and accountability. Additionally, advanced practice nurses struggle to negotiate and clarify scopes of practice while general practitioners have trouble justifying the costs associated with advanced practice nursing roles. Therefore, much work remains to establish and maintain the legitimacy of advanced practice nursing in general practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12912-016-0198-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5241982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52419822017-01-23 A systematic review of experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice Jakimowicz, Michael Williams, Danielle Stankiewicz, Grazyna BMC Nurs Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite efforts to achieve conceptual clarity, advanced practice nursing continues to reside in a liminal space, unable to secure ongoing recognition as a viable means of healthcare delivery. This is particularly evident in general practice where advanced practice role development is more fluid and generally less supported by the hierarchical structures evident in the hospital system. This review synthesises published qualitative studies reporting experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice. The panoramic view provided by patients, nurses and doctors within this novel context, offers a fresh perspective on why advanced practice nurses have struggled to gain acceptance within the healthcare milieu. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies that explored the experiences of patients, nurses and doctors who had contact with advanced practice nurses working in general practice. Published work from 1990 to June 2016 was located using CINAHL and PubMed. The full text of relevant studies was retrieved after reading the title and abstract. Critical appraisal was undertaken and the findings of included studies were analysed using the constant comparative method. Emergent codes were collapsed into sub-themes and themes. RESULTS: Twenty articles reporting the experiences of 486 participants were included. We identified one major theme: legitimacy; and three sub-themes: (1) establishing and maintaining confidence in the advanced practice nurse, (2) strengthening and weakening boundaries between general practitioners and advanced practice nurses and (3) establishing and maintaining the value of advanced practice nursing. CONCLUSIONS: We set out to describe experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice. We discovered that general practitioners and patients continue to have concerns around responsibility, trust and accountability. Additionally, advanced practice nurses struggle to negotiate and clarify scopes of practice while general practitioners have trouble justifying the costs associated with advanced practice nursing roles. Therefore, much work remains to establish and maintain the legitimacy of advanced practice nursing in general practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12912-016-0198-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5241982/ /pubmed/28115913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0198-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jakimowicz, Michael
Williams, Danielle
Stankiewicz, Grazyna
A systematic review of experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice
title A systematic review of experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice
title_full A systematic review of experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice
title_fullStr A systematic review of experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice
title_short A systematic review of experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice
title_sort systematic review of experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5241982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28115913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0198-7
work_keys_str_mv AT jakimowiczmichael asystematicreviewofexperiencesofadvancedpracticenursingingeneralpractice
AT williamsdanielle asystematicreviewofexperiencesofadvancedpracticenursingingeneralpractice
AT stankiewiczgrazyna asystematicreviewofexperiencesofadvancedpracticenursingingeneralpractice
AT jakimowiczmichael systematicreviewofexperiencesofadvancedpracticenursingingeneralpractice
AT williamsdanielle systematicreviewofexperiencesofadvancedpracticenursingingeneralpractice
AT stankiewiczgrazyna systematicreviewofexperiencesofadvancedpracticenursingingeneralpractice