Cargando…

Is aclidinium alone or combined with a LABA a rational choice for symptomatic COPD patients?

BACKGROUND: As emphasized by international recommendations and largely confirmed by clinical experience, long-acting bronchodilators play a central role in the maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) due to their proven efficacy in reducing airflow obstruction and impro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blasi, F., Canonica, G. W., Miravitlles, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5242048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28100244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-017-0506-0
_version_ 1782496289810808832
author Blasi, F.
Canonica, G. W.
Miravitlles, M.
author_facet Blasi, F.
Canonica, G. W.
Miravitlles, M.
author_sort Blasi, F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As emphasized by international recommendations and largely confirmed by clinical experience, long-acting bronchodilators play a central role in the maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) due to their proven efficacy in reducing airflow obstruction and improving symptoms. MAIN BODY: There are some important aspects to define with regard to inhalation therapy for COPD, particularly those concerning the selection criteria and the optimal use of long-acting bronchodilators. First of all, it needs to be determined in which patients and clinical situations monotherapy with one bronchodilator, such as a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), should be considered adequate, and in which cases the use of combination therapies, such as the “double bronchodilation” with a LAMA and a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA), should be preferred. Another critical issue concerns the effect of the frequency of daily administration of inhaled agents on the control of symptoms during the 24 h. COPD symptoms are known to exhibit considerable circadian variability with worsening in the early morning, and a significant proportion of patients have disease-related sleep disorders which can adversely affect their quality of life. The worsening of symptoms in the early morning may be due, at least in part, to a reduction in airway caliber caused by an increased “cholinergic tone” at night. As such, the coverage of nighttime and early morning symptoms is a reasonable therapeutic goal, which can be achieved by many patients using LAMAs such as aclidinium bromide twice daily (BID). Therapeutic adherence is known to be a multifactorial phenomenon that is frequently affected by other aspects than dosing frequency, including the technical features and ease of use of the inhalers. To this end, it should be mentioned that certain new-generation inhalers such as Genuair® have been associated in clinical trials with higher patient preference. CONCLUSION: In this work, in addition to presenting an overview of the main evidence on the efficacy of COPD treatment with the LAMA aclidinium bromide BID, we suggest some selection criteria for the monotherapy with one long-acting bronchodilator or the combination therapy with LAMA and LABA in COPD patients, with particular reference to specific clinical scenarios.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5242048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52420482017-01-23 Is aclidinium alone or combined with a LABA a rational choice for symptomatic COPD patients? Blasi, F. Canonica, G. W. Miravitlles, M. Respir Res Review BACKGROUND: As emphasized by international recommendations and largely confirmed by clinical experience, long-acting bronchodilators play a central role in the maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) due to their proven efficacy in reducing airflow obstruction and improving symptoms. MAIN BODY: There are some important aspects to define with regard to inhalation therapy for COPD, particularly those concerning the selection criteria and the optimal use of long-acting bronchodilators. First of all, it needs to be determined in which patients and clinical situations monotherapy with one bronchodilator, such as a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), should be considered adequate, and in which cases the use of combination therapies, such as the “double bronchodilation” with a LAMA and a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA), should be preferred. Another critical issue concerns the effect of the frequency of daily administration of inhaled agents on the control of symptoms during the 24 h. COPD symptoms are known to exhibit considerable circadian variability with worsening in the early morning, and a significant proportion of patients have disease-related sleep disorders which can adversely affect their quality of life. The worsening of symptoms in the early morning may be due, at least in part, to a reduction in airway caliber caused by an increased “cholinergic tone” at night. As such, the coverage of nighttime and early morning symptoms is a reasonable therapeutic goal, which can be achieved by many patients using LAMAs such as aclidinium bromide twice daily (BID). Therapeutic adherence is known to be a multifactorial phenomenon that is frequently affected by other aspects than dosing frequency, including the technical features and ease of use of the inhalers. To this end, it should be mentioned that certain new-generation inhalers such as Genuair® have been associated in clinical trials with higher patient preference. CONCLUSION: In this work, in addition to presenting an overview of the main evidence on the efficacy of COPD treatment with the LAMA aclidinium bromide BID, we suggest some selection criteria for the monotherapy with one long-acting bronchodilator or the combination therapy with LAMA and LABA in COPD patients, with particular reference to specific clinical scenarios. BioMed Central 2017-01-18 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5242048/ /pubmed/28100244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-017-0506-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Blasi, F.
Canonica, G. W.
Miravitlles, M.
Is aclidinium alone or combined with a LABA a rational choice for symptomatic COPD patients?
title Is aclidinium alone or combined with a LABA a rational choice for symptomatic COPD patients?
title_full Is aclidinium alone or combined with a LABA a rational choice for symptomatic COPD patients?
title_fullStr Is aclidinium alone or combined with a LABA a rational choice for symptomatic COPD patients?
title_full_unstemmed Is aclidinium alone or combined with a LABA a rational choice for symptomatic COPD patients?
title_short Is aclidinium alone or combined with a LABA a rational choice for symptomatic COPD patients?
title_sort is aclidinium alone or combined with a laba a rational choice for symptomatic copd patients?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5242048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28100244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-017-0506-0
work_keys_str_mv AT blasif isaclidiniumaloneorcombinedwithalabaarationalchoiceforsymptomaticcopdpatients
AT canonicagw isaclidiniumaloneorcombinedwithalabaarationalchoiceforsymptomaticcopdpatients
AT miravitllesm isaclidiniumaloneorcombinedwithalabaarationalchoiceforsymptomaticcopdpatients