Cargando…
Temporal Expectations Guide Dynamic Prioritization in Visual Working Memory through Attenuated α Oscillations
Although working memory is generally considered a highly dynamic mnemonic store, popular laboratory tasks used to understand its psychological and neural mechanisms (such as change detection and continuous reproduction) often remain relatively “static,” involving the retention of a set number of ite...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society for Neuroscience
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5242399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28077721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2272-16.2016 |
_version_ | 1782496327155843072 |
---|---|
author | van Ede, Freek Niklaus, Marcel Nobre, Anna C. |
author_facet | van Ede, Freek Niklaus, Marcel Nobre, Anna C. |
author_sort | van Ede, Freek |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although working memory is generally considered a highly dynamic mnemonic store, popular laboratory tasks used to understand its psychological and neural mechanisms (such as change detection and continuous reproduction) often remain relatively “static,” involving the retention of a set number of items throughout a shared delay interval. In the current study, we investigated visual working memory in a more dynamic setting, and assessed the following: (1) whether internally guided temporal expectations can dynamically and reversibly prioritize individual mnemonic items at specific times at which they are deemed most relevant; and (2) the neural substrates that support such dynamic prioritization. Participants encoded two differently colored oriented bars into visual working memory to retrieve the orientation of one bar with a precision judgment when subsequently probed. To test for the flexible temporal control to access and retrieve remembered items, we manipulated the probability for each of the two bars to be probed over time, and recorded EEG in healthy human volunteers. Temporal expectations had a profound influence on working memory performance, leading to faster access times as well as more accurate orientation reproductions for items that were probed at expected times. Furthermore, this dynamic prioritization was associated with the temporally specific attenuation of contralateral α (8–14 Hz) oscillations that, moreover, predicted working memory access times on a trial-by-trial basis. We conclude that attentional prioritization in working memory can be dynamically steered by internally guided temporal expectations, and is supported by the attenuation of α oscillations in task-relevant sensory brain areas. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In dynamic, everyday-like, environments, flexible goal-directed behavior requires that mental representations that are kept in an active (working memory) store are dynamic, too. We investigated working memory in a more dynamic setting than is conventional, and demonstrate that expectations about when mnemonic items are most relevant can dynamically and reversibly prioritize these items in time. Moreover, we uncover a neural substrate of such dynamic prioritization in contralateral visual brain areas and show that this substrate predicts working memory retrieval times on a trial-by-trial basis. This places the experimental study of working memory, and its neuronal underpinnings, in a more dynamic and ecologically valid context, and provides new insights into the neural implementation of attentional prioritization within working memory. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5242399 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Society for Neuroscience |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52423992017-01-31 Temporal Expectations Guide Dynamic Prioritization in Visual Working Memory through Attenuated α Oscillations van Ede, Freek Niklaus, Marcel Nobre, Anna C. J Neurosci Research Articles Although working memory is generally considered a highly dynamic mnemonic store, popular laboratory tasks used to understand its psychological and neural mechanisms (such as change detection and continuous reproduction) often remain relatively “static,” involving the retention of a set number of items throughout a shared delay interval. In the current study, we investigated visual working memory in a more dynamic setting, and assessed the following: (1) whether internally guided temporal expectations can dynamically and reversibly prioritize individual mnemonic items at specific times at which they are deemed most relevant; and (2) the neural substrates that support such dynamic prioritization. Participants encoded two differently colored oriented bars into visual working memory to retrieve the orientation of one bar with a precision judgment when subsequently probed. To test for the flexible temporal control to access and retrieve remembered items, we manipulated the probability for each of the two bars to be probed over time, and recorded EEG in healthy human volunteers. Temporal expectations had a profound influence on working memory performance, leading to faster access times as well as more accurate orientation reproductions for items that were probed at expected times. Furthermore, this dynamic prioritization was associated with the temporally specific attenuation of contralateral α (8–14 Hz) oscillations that, moreover, predicted working memory access times on a trial-by-trial basis. We conclude that attentional prioritization in working memory can be dynamically steered by internally guided temporal expectations, and is supported by the attenuation of α oscillations in task-relevant sensory brain areas. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In dynamic, everyday-like, environments, flexible goal-directed behavior requires that mental representations that are kept in an active (working memory) store are dynamic, too. We investigated working memory in a more dynamic setting than is conventional, and demonstrate that expectations about when mnemonic items are most relevant can dynamically and reversibly prioritize these items in time. Moreover, we uncover a neural substrate of such dynamic prioritization in contralateral visual brain areas and show that this substrate predicts working memory retrieval times on a trial-by-trial basis. This places the experimental study of working memory, and its neuronal underpinnings, in a more dynamic and ecologically valid context, and provides new insights into the neural implementation of attentional prioritization within working memory. Society for Neuroscience 2017-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5242399/ /pubmed/28077721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2272-16.2016 Text en Copyright © 2017 van Ede et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles van Ede, Freek Niklaus, Marcel Nobre, Anna C. Temporal Expectations Guide Dynamic Prioritization in Visual Working Memory through Attenuated α Oscillations |
title | Temporal Expectations Guide Dynamic Prioritization in Visual Working Memory through Attenuated α Oscillations |
title_full | Temporal Expectations Guide Dynamic Prioritization in Visual Working Memory through Attenuated α Oscillations |
title_fullStr | Temporal Expectations Guide Dynamic Prioritization in Visual Working Memory through Attenuated α Oscillations |
title_full_unstemmed | Temporal Expectations Guide Dynamic Prioritization in Visual Working Memory through Attenuated α Oscillations |
title_short | Temporal Expectations Guide Dynamic Prioritization in Visual Working Memory through Attenuated α Oscillations |
title_sort | temporal expectations guide dynamic prioritization in visual working memory through attenuated α oscillations |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5242399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28077721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2272-16.2016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanedefreek temporalexpectationsguidedynamicprioritizationinvisualworkingmemorythroughattenuatedaoscillations AT niklausmarcel temporalexpectationsguidedynamicprioritizationinvisualworkingmemorythroughattenuatedaoscillations AT nobreannac temporalexpectationsguidedynamicprioritizationinvisualworkingmemorythroughattenuatedaoscillations |