Cargando…
Perception, Action, and Roelofs Effect: A Mere Illusion of Dissociation
A prominent and influential hypothesis of vision suggests the existence of two separate visual systems within the brain, one creating our perception of the world and another guiding our actions within it. The induced Roelofs effect has been described as providing strong evidence for this perception/...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC524248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15510224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020364 |
_version_ | 1782121890255470592 |
---|---|
author | Dassonville, Paul Bala, Jagdeep Kaur |
author_facet | Dassonville, Paul Bala, Jagdeep Kaur |
author_sort | Dassonville, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | A prominent and influential hypothesis of vision suggests the existence of two separate visual systems within the brain, one creating our perception of the world and another guiding our actions within it. The induced Roelofs effect has been described as providing strong evidence for this perception/action dissociation: When a small visual target is surrounded by a large frame positioned so that the frame's center is offset from the observer's midline, the perceived location of the target is shifted in the direction opposite the frame's offset. In spite of this perceptual mislocalization, however, the observer can accurately guide movements to the target location. Thus, perception is prone to the illusion while actions seem immune. Here we demonstrate that the Roelofs illusion is caused by a frame-induced transient distortion of the observer's apparent midline. We further demonstrate that actions guided to targets within this same distorted egocentric reference frame are fully expected to be accurate, since the errors of target localization will exactly cancel the errors of motor guidance. These findings provide a mechanistic explanation for the various perceptual and motor effects of the induced Roelofs illusion without requiring the existence of separate neural systems for perception and action. Given this, the behavioral dissociation that accompanies the Roelofs effect cannot be considered evidence of a dissociation of perception and action. This indicates a general need to re-evaluate the broad class of evidence purported to support this hypothesized dissociation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-524248 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-5242482004-10-26 Perception, Action, and Roelofs Effect: A Mere Illusion of Dissociation Dassonville, Paul Bala, Jagdeep Kaur PLoS Biol Research Article A prominent and influential hypothesis of vision suggests the existence of two separate visual systems within the brain, one creating our perception of the world and another guiding our actions within it. The induced Roelofs effect has been described as providing strong evidence for this perception/action dissociation: When a small visual target is surrounded by a large frame positioned so that the frame's center is offset from the observer's midline, the perceived location of the target is shifted in the direction opposite the frame's offset. In spite of this perceptual mislocalization, however, the observer can accurately guide movements to the target location. Thus, perception is prone to the illusion while actions seem immune. Here we demonstrate that the Roelofs illusion is caused by a frame-induced transient distortion of the observer's apparent midline. We further demonstrate that actions guided to targets within this same distorted egocentric reference frame are fully expected to be accurate, since the errors of target localization will exactly cancel the errors of motor guidance. These findings provide a mechanistic explanation for the various perceptual and motor effects of the induced Roelofs illusion without requiring the existence of separate neural systems for perception and action. Given this, the behavioral dissociation that accompanies the Roelofs effect cannot be considered evidence of a dissociation of perception and action. This indicates a general need to re-evaluate the broad class of evidence purported to support this hypothesized dissociation. Public Library of Science 2004-11 2004-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC524248/ /pubmed/15510224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020364 Text en Copyright: © 2004 Dassonville and Bala. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dassonville, Paul Bala, Jagdeep Kaur Perception, Action, and Roelofs Effect: A Mere Illusion of Dissociation |
title | Perception, Action, and Roelofs Effect: A Mere Illusion of Dissociation |
title_full | Perception, Action, and Roelofs Effect: A Mere Illusion of Dissociation |
title_fullStr | Perception, Action, and Roelofs Effect: A Mere Illusion of Dissociation |
title_full_unstemmed | Perception, Action, and Roelofs Effect: A Mere Illusion of Dissociation |
title_short | Perception, Action, and Roelofs Effect: A Mere Illusion of Dissociation |
title_sort | perception, action, and roelofs effect: a mere illusion of dissociation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC524248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15510224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020364 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dassonvillepaul perceptionactionandroelofseffectamereillusionofdissociation AT balajagdeepkaur perceptionactionandroelofseffectamereillusionofdissociation |