Cargando…
Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities
The application of high-throughput, next-generation sequencing technologies has greatly improved our understanding of the human oral microbiome. While deciphering this diverse microbial community using such approaches is more accurate than traditional culture-based methods, experimental bias introdu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5242530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28099455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169877 |
_version_ | 1782496349581737984 |
---|---|
author | Vesty, Anna Biswas, Kristi Taylor, Michael W. Gear, Kim Douglas, Richard G. |
author_facet | Vesty, Anna Biswas, Kristi Taylor, Michael W. Gear, Kim Douglas, Richard G. |
author_sort | Vesty, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | The application of high-throughput, next-generation sequencing technologies has greatly improved our understanding of the human oral microbiome. While deciphering this diverse microbial community using such approaches is more accurate than traditional culture-based methods, experimental bias introduced during critical steps such as DNA extraction may compromise the results obtained. Here, we systematically evaluate four commonly used microbial DNA extraction methods (MoBio PowerSoil(®) DNA Isolation Kit, QIAamp(®) DNA Mini Kit, Zymo Bacterial/Fungal DNA Mini Prep(TM), phenol:chloroform-based DNA isolation) based on the following criteria: DNA quality and yield, and microbial community structure based on Illumina amplicon sequencing of the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene of bacteria and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 1 region of fungi. Our results indicate that DNA quality and yield varied significantly with DNA extraction method. Representation of bacterial genera in plaque and saliva samples did not significantly differ across DNA extraction methods and DNA extraction method showed no effect on the recovery of fungal genera from plaque. By contrast, fungal diversity from saliva was affected by DNA extraction method, suggesting that not all protocols are suitable to study the salivary mycobiome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5242530 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52425302017-02-06 Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities Vesty, Anna Biswas, Kristi Taylor, Michael W. Gear, Kim Douglas, Richard G. PLoS One Research Article The application of high-throughput, next-generation sequencing technologies has greatly improved our understanding of the human oral microbiome. While deciphering this diverse microbial community using such approaches is more accurate than traditional culture-based methods, experimental bias introduced during critical steps such as DNA extraction may compromise the results obtained. Here, we systematically evaluate four commonly used microbial DNA extraction methods (MoBio PowerSoil(®) DNA Isolation Kit, QIAamp(®) DNA Mini Kit, Zymo Bacterial/Fungal DNA Mini Prep(TM), phenol:chloroform-based DNA isolation) based on the following criteria: DNA quality and yield, and microbial community structure based on Illumina amplicon sequencing of the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene of bacteria and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 1 region of fungi. Our results indicate that DNA quality and yield varied significantly with DNA extraction method. Representation of bacterial genera in plaque and saliva samples did not significantly differ across DNA extraction methods and DNA extraction method showed no effect on the recovery of fungal genera from plaque. By contrast, fungal diversity from saliva was affected by DNA extraction method, suggesting that not all protocols are suitable to study the salivary mycobiome. Public Library of Science 2017-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5242530/ /pubmed/28099455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169877 Text en © 2017 Vesty et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vesty, Anna Biswas, Kristi Taylor, Michael W. Gear, Kim Douglas, Richard G. Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities |
title | Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities |
title_full | Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities |
title_short | Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities |
title_sort | evaluating the impact of dna extraction method on the representation of human oral bacterial and fungal communities |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5242530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28099455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169877 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vestyanna evaluatingtheimpactofdnaextractionmethodontherepresentationofhumanoralbacterialandfungalcommunities AT biswaskristi evaluatingtheimpactofdnaextractionmethodontherepresentationofhumanoralbacterialandfungalcommunities AT taylormichaelw evaluatingtheimpactofdnaextractionmethodontherepresentationofhumanoralbacterialandfungalcommunities AT gearkim evaluatingtheimpactofdnaextractionmethodontherepresentationofhumanoralbacterialandfungalcommunities AT douglasrichardg evaluatingtheimpactofdnaextractionmethodontherepresentationofhumanoralbacterialandfungalcommunities |