Cargando…

Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities

The application of high-throughput, next-generation sequencing technologies has greatly improved our understanding of the human oral microbiome. While deciphering this diverse microbial community using such approaches is more accurate than traditional culture-based methods, experimental bias introdu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vesty, Anna, Biswas, Kristi, Taylor, Michael W., Gear, Kim, Douglas, Richard G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5242530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28099455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169877
_version_ 1782496349581737984
author Vesty, Anna
Biswas, Kristi
Taylor, Michael W.
Gear, Kim
Douglas, Richard G.
author_facet Vesty, Anna
Biswas, Kristi
Taylor, Michael W.
Gear, Kim
Douglas, Richard G.
author_sort Vesty, Anna
collection PubMed
description The application of high-throughput, next-generation sequencing technologies has greatly improved our understanding of the human oral microbiome. While deciphering this diverse microbial community using such approaches is more accurate than traditional culture-based methods, experimental bias introduced during critical steps such as DNA extraction may compromise the results obtained. Here, we systematically evaluate four commonly used microbial DNA extraction methods (MoBio PowerSoil(®) DNA Isolation Kit, QIAamp(®) DNA Mini Kit, Zymo Bacterial/Fungal DNA Mini Prep(TM), phenol:chloroform-based DNA isolation) based on the following criteria: DNA quality and yield, and microbial community structure based on Illumina amplicon sequencing of the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene of bacteria and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 1 region of fungi. Our results indicate that DNA quality and yield varied significantly with DNA extraction method. Representation of bacterial genera in plaque and saliva samples did not significantly differ across DNA extraction methods and DNA extraction method showed no effect on the recovery of fungal genera from plaque. By contrast, fungal diversity from saliva was affected by DNA extraction method, suggesting that not all protocols are suitable to study the salivary mycobiome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5242530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52425302017-02-06 Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities Vesty, Anna Biswas, Kristi Taylor, Michael W. Gear, Kim Douglas, Richard G. PLoS One Research Article The application of high-throughput, next-generation sequencing technologies has greatly improved our understanding of the human oral microbiome. While deciphering this diverse microbial community using such approaches is more accurate than traditional culture-based methods, experimental bias introduced during critical steps such as DNA extraction may compromise the results obtained. Here, we systematically evaluate four commonly used microbial DNA extraction methods (MoBio PowerSoil(®) DNA Isolation Kit, QIAamp(®) DNA Mini Kit, Zymo Bacterial/Fungal DNA Mini Prep(TM), phenol:chloroform-based DNA isolation) based on the following criteria: DNA quality and yield, and microbial community structure based on Illumina amplicon sequencing of the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene of bacteria and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 1 region of fungi. Our results indicate that DNA quality and yield varied significantly with DNA extraction method. Representation of bacterial genera in plaque and saliva samples did not significantly differ across DNA extraction methods and DNA extraction method showed no effect on the recovery of fungal genera from plaque. By contrast, fungal diversity from saliva was affected by DNA extraction method, suggesting that not all protocols are suitable to study the salivary mycobiome. Public Library of Science 2017-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5242530/ /pubmed/28099455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169877 Text en © 2017 Vesty et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vesty, Anna
Biswas, Kristi
Taylor, Michael W.
Gear, Kim
Douglas, Richard G.
Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities
title Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities
title_full Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities
title_fullStr Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities
title_short Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities
title_sort evaluating the impact of dna extraction method on the representation of human oral bacterial and fungal communities
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5242530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28099455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169877
work_keys_str_mv AT vestyanna evaluatingtheimpactofdnaextractionmethodontherepresentationofhumanoralbacterialandfungalcommunities
AT biswaskristi evaluatingtheimpactofdnaextractionmethodontherepresentationofhumanoralbacterialandfungalcommunities
AT taylormichaelw evaluatingtheimpactofdnaextractionmethodontherepresentationofhumanoralbacterialandfungalcommunities
AT gearkim evaluatingtheimpactofdnaextractionmethodontherepresentationofhumanoralbacterialandfungalcommunities
AT douglasrichardg evaluatingtheimpactofdnaextractionmethodontherepresentationofhumanoralbacterialandfungalcommunities