Cargando…

Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models

Animals and humans have a tendency to repeat recent choices, a phenomenon known as choice hysteresis. The mechanism for this choice bias remains unclear. Using an established, biophysically informed model of a competitive attractor network for decision making, we found that decaying tail activity fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonaiuto, James J, de Berker, Archy, Bestmann, Sven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5243027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005007
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20047
_version_ 1782496445296803840
author Bonaiuto, James J
de Berker, Archy
Bestmann, Sven
author_facet Bonaiuto, James J
de Berker, Archy
Bestmann, Sven
author_sort Bonaiuto, James J
collection PubMed
description Animals and humans have a tendency to repeat recent choices, a phenomenon known as choice hysteresis. The mechanism for this choice bias remains unclear. Using an established, biophysically informed model of a competitive attractor network for decision making, we found that decaying tail activity from the previous trial caused choice hysteresis, especially during difficult trials, and accurately predicted human perceptual choices. In the model, choice variability could be directionally altered through amplification or dampening of post-trial activity decay through simulated depolarizing or hyperpolarizing network stimulation. An analogous intervention using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) yielded a close match between model predictions and experimental results: net soma depolarizing currents increased choice hysteresis, while hyperpolarizing currents suppressed it. Residual activity in competitive attractor networks within dlPFC may thus give rise to biases in perceptual choices, which can be directionally controlled through non-invasive brain stimulation. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20047.001
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5243027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52430272017-01-23 Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models Bonaiuto, James J de Berker, Archy Bestmann, Sven eLife Neuroscience Animals and humans have a tendency to repeat recent choices, a phenomenon known as choice hysteresis. The mechanism for this choice bias remains unclear. Using an established, biophysically informed model of a competitive attractor network for decision making, we found that decaying tail activity from the previous trial caused choice hysteresis, especially during difficult trials, and accurately predicted human perceptual choices. In the model, choice variability could be directionally altered through amplification or dampening of post-trial activity decay through simulated depolarizing or hyperpolarizing network stimulation. An analogous intervention using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) yielded a close match between model predictions and experimental results: net soma depolarizing currents increased choice hysteresis, while hyperpolarizing currents suppressed it. Residual activity in competitive attractor networks within dlPFC may thus give rise to biases in perceptual choices, which can be directionally controlled through non-invasive brain stimulation. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20047.001 eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2016-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5243027/ /pubmed/28005007 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20047 Text en © 2016, Bonaiuto et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Bonaiuto, James J
de Berker, Archy
Bestmann, Sven
Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models
title Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models
title_full Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models
title_fullStr Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models
title_full_unstemmed Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models
title_short Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models
title_sort response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5243027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005007
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20047
work_keys_str_mv AT bonaiutojamesj responserepetitionbiasesinhumanperceptualdecisionsareexplainedbyactivitydecayincompetitiveattractormodels
AT deberkerarchy responserepetitionbiasesinhumanperceptualdecisionsareexplainedbyactivitydecayincompetitiveattractormodels
AT bestmannsven responserepetitionbiasesinhumanperceptualdecisionsareexplainedbyactivitydecayincompetitiveattractormodels