Cargando…
Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models
Animals and humans have a tendency to repeat recent choices, a phenomenon known as choice hysteresis. The mechanism for this choice bias remains unclear. Using an established, biophysically informed model of a competitive attractor network for decision making, we found that decaying tail activity fr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5243027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005007 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20047 |
_version_ | 1782496445296803840 |
---|---|
author | Bonaiuto, James J de Berker, Archy Bestmann, Sven |
author_facet | Bonaiuto, James J de Berker, Archy Bestmann, Sven |
author_sort | Bonaiuto, James J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Animals and humans have a tendency to repeat recent choices, a phenomenon known as choice hysteresis. The mechanism for this choice bias remains unclear. Using an established, biophysically informed model of a competitive attractor network for decision making, we found that decaying tail activity from the previous trial caused choice hysteresis, especially during difficult trials, and accurately predicted human perceptual choices. In the model, choice variability could be directionally altered through amplification or dampening of post-trial activity decay through simulated depolarizing or hyperpolarizing network stimulation. An analogous intervention using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) yielded a close match between model predictions and experimental results: net soma depolarizing currents increased choice hysteresis, while hyperpolarizing currents suppressed it. Residual activity in competitive attractor networks within dlPFC may thus give rise to biases in perceptual choices, which can be directionally controlled through non-invasive brain stimulation. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20047.001 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5243027 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52430272017-01-23 Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models Bonaiuto, James J de Berker, Archy Bestmann, Sven eLife Neuroscience Animals and humans have a tendency to repeat recent choices, a phenomenon known as choice hysteresis. The mechanism for this choice bias remains unclear. Using an established, biophysically informed model of a competitive attractor network for decision making, we found that decaying tail activity from the previous trial caused choice hysteresis, especially during difficult trials, and accurately predicted human perceptual choices. In the model, choice variability could be directionally altered through amplification or dampening of post-trial activity decay through simulated depolarizing or hyperpolarizing network stimulation. An analogous intervention using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) yielded a close match between model predictions and experimental results: net soma depolarizing currents increased choice hysteresis, while hyperpolarizing currents suppressed it. Residual activity in competitive attractor networks within dlPFC may thus give rise to biases in perceptual choices, which can be directionally controlled through non-invasive brain stimulation. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20047.001 eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2016-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5243027/ /pubmed/28005007 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20047 Text en © 2016, Bonaiuto et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Bonaiuto, James J de Berker, Archy Bestmann, Sven Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models |
title | Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models |
title_full | Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models |
title_fullStr | Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models |
title_full_unstemmed | Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models |
title_short | Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models |
title_sort | response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5243027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005007 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20047 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bonaiutojamesj responserepetitionbiasesinhumanperceptualdecisionsareexplainedbyactivitydecayincompetitiveattractormodels AT deberkerarchy responserepetitionbiasesinhumanperceptualdecisionsareexplainedbyactivitydecayincompetitiveattractormodels AT bestmannsven responserepetitionbiasesinhumanperceptualdecisionsareexplainedbyactivitydecayincompetitiveattractormodels |