Cargando…

Remating responses are consistent with male postcopulatory manipulation but not reinforcement in D. pseudoobscura

Reinforcement occurs when hybridization between closely related lineages produces low‐fitness offspring, prompting selection for elevated reproductive isolation specifically in areas of sympatry. Both premating and postmating prezygotic behaviors have been shown to be the target of reinforcing selec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis, Jeremy S., Castillo, Dean M., Moyle, Leonie C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5243186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28116047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2628
_version_ 1782496468875083776
author Davis, Jeremy S.
Castillo, Dean M.
Moyle, Leonie C.
author_facet Davis, Jeremy S.
Castillo, Dean M.
Moyle, Leonie C.
author_sort Davis, Jeremy S.
collection PubMed
description Reinforcement occurs when hybridization between closely related lineages produces low‐fitness offspring, prompting selection for elevated reproductive isolation specifically in areas of sympatry. Both premating and postmating prezygotic behaviors have been shown to be the target of reinforcing selection, but it remains unclear whether remating behaviors experience reinforcement, although they can also influence offspring identity and limit formation of hybrids. Here, we evaluated evidence for reinforcing selection on remating behaviors in Drosophila pseudoobscura, by comparing remating traits in females from populations historically allopatric and sympatric with Drosophila persimilis. We found that the propensity to remate was not higher in sympatric females, compared to allopatric females, regardless of whether the first mated male was heterospecific or conspecific. Moreover, remating behavior did not contribute to interspecific reproductive isolation among any population; that is, females showed no higher propensity to remate following a heterospecific first mating than following a conspecific first mating. Instead, we found that females are less likely to remate after initial matings with unfamiliar males, regardless of species identity. This is consistent with one scenario of postmating sexual conflict in which females are poorly defended against postcopulatory manipulation by males with whom they have not coevolved. Our results are generally inconsistent with reinforcement on remating traits and suggest that this behavior might be more strongly shaped by the consequences of local antagonistic male–female interactions than interactions with heterospecifics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5243186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52431862017-01-23 Remating responses are consistent with male postcopulatory manipulation but not reinforcement in D. pseudoobscura Davis, Jeremy S. Castillo, Dean M. Moyle, Leonie C. Ecol Evol Original Research Reinforcement occurs when hybridization between closely related lineages produces low‐fitness offspring, prompting selection for elevated reproductive isolation specifically in areas of sympatry. Both premating and postmating prezygotic behaviors have been shown to be the target of reinforcing selection, but it remains unclear whether remating behaviors experience reinforcement, although they can also influence offspring identity and limit formation of hybrids. Here, we evaluated evidence for reinforcing selection on remating behaviors in Drosophila pseudoobscura, by comparing remating traits in females from populations historically allopatric and sympatric with Drosophila persimilis. We found that the propensity to remate was not higher in sympatric females, compared to allopatric females, regardless of whether the first mated male was heterospecific or conspecific. Moreover, remating behavior did not contribute to interspecific reproductive isolation among any population; that is, females showed no higher propensity to remate following a heterospecific first mating than following a conspecific first mating. Instead, we found that females are less likely to remate after initial matings with unfamiliar males, regardless of species identity. This is consistent with one scenario of postmating sexual conflict in which females are poorly defended against postcopulatory manipulation by males with whom they have not coevolved. Our results are generally inconsistent with reinforcement on remating traits and suggest that this behavior might be more strongly shaped by the consequences of local antagonistic male–female interactions than interactions with heterospecifics. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5243186/ /pubmed/28116047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2628 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Davis, Jeremy S.
Castillo, Dean M.
Moyle, Leonie C.
Remating responses are consistent with male postcopulatory manipulation but not reinforcement in D. pseudoobscura
title Remating responses are consistent with male postcopulatory manipulation but not reinforcement in D. pseudoobscura
title_full Remating responses are consistent with male postcopulatory manipulation but not reinforcement in D. pseudoobscura
title_fullStr Remating responses are consistent with male postcopulatory manipulation but not reinforcement in D. pseudoobscura
title_full_unstemmed Remating responses are consistent with male postcopulatory manipulation but not reinforcement in D. pseudoobscura
title_short Remating responses are consistent with male postcopulatory manipulation but not reinforcement in D. pseudoobscura
title_sort remating responses are consistent with male postcopulatory manipulation but not reinforcement in d. pseudoobscura
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5243186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28116047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2628
work_keys_str_mv AT davisjeremys rematingresponsesareconsistentwithmalepostcopulatorymanipulationbutnotreinforcementindpseudoobscura
AT castillodeanm rematingresponsesareconsistentwithmalepostcopulatorymanipulationbutnotreinforcementindpseudoobscura
AT moyleleoniec rematingresponsesareconsistentwithmalepostcopulatorymanipulationbutnotreinforcementindpseudoobscura