Cargando…

The large X‐effect on secondary sexual characters and the genetics of variation in sex comb tooth number in Drosophila subobscura

Genetic studies of secondary sexual traits provide insights into whether and how selection drove their divergence among populations, and these studies often focus on the fraction of variation attributable to genes on the X‐chromosome. However, such studies may sometimes misinterpret the amount of va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mittleman, Briana E., Manzano‐Winkler, Brenda, Hall, Julianne B., Korunes, Katharine L., Noor, Mohamed A. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5243774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28116050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2634
_version_ 1782496575229001728
author Mittleman, Briana E.
Manzano‐Winkler, Brenda
Hall, Julianne B.
Korunes, Katharine L.
Noor, Mohamed A. F.
author_facet Mittleman, Briana E.
Manzano‐Winkler, Brenda
Hall, Julianne B.
Korunes, Katharine L.
Noor, Mohamed A. F.
author_sort Mittleman, Briana E.
collection PubMed
description Genetic studies of secondary sexual traits provide insights into whether and how selection drove their divergence among populations, and these studies often focus on the fraction of variation attributable to genes on the X‐chromosome. However, such studies may sometimes misinterpret the amount of variation attributable to the X‐chromosome if using only simple reciprocal F(1) crosses, or they may presume sexual selection has affected the observed phenotypic variation. We examined the genetics of a secondary sexual trait, male sex comb size, in Drosophila subobscura. This species bears unusually large sex combs for its species group, and therefore, this trait may be a good candidate for having been affected by natural or sexual selection. We observed significant heritable variation in number of teeth of the distal sex comb across strains. While reciprocal F(1) crosses seemed to implicate a disproportionate X‐chromosome effect, further examination in the F(2) progeny showed that transgressive autosomal effects inflated the estimate of variation associated with the X‐chromosome in the F(1). Instead, the X‐chromosome appears to confer the smallest contribution of all major chromosomes to the observed phenotypic variation. Further, we failed to detect effects on copulation latency or duration associated with the observed phenotypic variation. Overall, this study presents an examination of the genetics underlying segregating phenotypic variation within species and illustrates two common pitfalls associated with some past studies of the genetic basis of secondary sexual traits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5243774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52437742017-01-23 The large X‐effect on secondary sexual characters and the genetics of variation in sex comb tooth number in Drosophila subobscura Mittleman, Briana E. Manzano‐Winkler, Brenda Hall, Julianne B. Korunes, Katharine L. Noor, Mohamed A. F. Ecol Evol Original Research Genetic studies of secondary sexual traits provide insights into whether and how selection drove their divergence among populations, and these studies often focus on the fraction of variation attributable to genes on the X‐chromosome. However, such studies may sometimes misinterpret the amount of variation attributable to the X‐chromosome if using only simple reciprocal F(1) crosses, or they may presume sexual selection has affected the observed phenotypic variation. We examined the genetics of a secondary sexual trait, male sex comb size, in Drosophila subobscura. This species bears unusually large sex combs for its species group, and therefore, this trait may be a good candidate for having been affected by natural or sexual selection. We observed significant heritable variation in number of teeth of the distal sex comb across strains. While reciprocal F(1) crosses seemed to implicate a disproportionate X‐chromosome effect, further examination in the F(2) progeny showed that transgressive autosomal effects inflated the estimate of variation associated with the X‐chromosome in the F(1). Instead, the X‐chromosome appears to confer the smallest contribution of all major chromosomes to the observed phenotypic variation. Further, we failed to detect effects on copulation latency or duration associated with the observed phenotypic variation. Overall, this study presents an examination of the genetics underlying segregating phenotypic variation within species and illustrates two common pitfalls associated with some past studies of the genetic basis of secondary sexual traits. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5243774/ /pubmed/28116050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2634 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mittleman, Briana E.
Manzano‐Winkler, Brenda
Hall, Julianne B.
Korunes, Katharine L.
Noor, Mohamed A. F.
The large X‐effect on secondary sexual characters and the genetics of variation in sex comb tooth number in Drosophila subobscura
title The large X‐effect on secondary sexual characters and the genetics of variation in sex comb tooth number in Drosophila subobscura
title_full The large X‐effect on secondary sexual characters and the genetics of variation in sex comb tooth number in Drosophila subobscura
title_fullStr The large X‐effect on secondary sexual characters and the genetics of variation in sex comb tooth number in Drosophila subobscura
title_full_unstemmed The large X‐effect on secondary sexual characters and the genetics of variation in sex comb tooth number in Drosophila subobscura
title_short The large X‐effect on secondary sexual characters and the genetics of variation in sex comb tooth number in Drosophila subobscura
title_sort large x‐effect on secondary sexual characters and the genetics of variation in sex comb tooth number in drosophila subobscura
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5243774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28116050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2634
work_keys_str_mv AT mittlemanbrianae thelargexeffectonsecondarysexualcharactersandthegeneticsofvariationinsexcombtoothnumberindrosophilasubobscura
AT manzanowinklerbrenda thelargexeffectonsecondarysexualcharactersandthegeneticsofvariationinsexcombtoothnumberindrosophilasubobscura
AT halljulianneb thelargexeffectonsecondarysexualcharactersandthegeneticsofvariationinsexcombtoothnumberindrosophilasubobscura
AT koruneskatharinel thelargexeffectonsecondarysexualcharactersandthegeneticsofvariationinsexcombtoothnumberindrosophilasubobscura
AT noormohamedaf thelargexeffectonsecondarysexualcharactersandthegeneticsofvariationinsexcombtoothnumberindrosophilasubobscura
AT mittlemanbrianae largexeffectonsecondarysexualcharactersandthegeneticsofvariationinsexcombtoothnumberindrosophilasubobscura
AT manzanowinklerbrenda largexeffectonsecondarysexualcharactersandthegeneticsofvariationinsexcombtoothnumberindrosophilasubobscura
AT halljulianneb largexeffectonsecondarysexualcharactersandthegeneticsofvariationinsexcombtoothnumberindrosophilasubobscura
AT koruneskatharinel largexeffectonsecondarysexualcharactersandthegeneticsofvariationinsexcombtoothnumberindrosophilasubobscura
AT noormohamedaf largexeffectonsecondarysexualcharactersandthegeneticsofvariationinsexcombtoothnumberindrosophilasubobscura