Cargando…

The effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile

AIM: To examine the effects, after septoplasty, of local antibiotic pomades as an alternative to prophylactic antibiotic use, which is a controversial matter among the otolaryngologists, on nasal flora and bacterial growth. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Nasal packings placed after septoplasty surgery to prov...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bilici, Suat, Durna, Yusuf Muhammed, Yigit, Ozgur, Karatas, Aysel, Cimen, Cansu, Fincancı, Muzaffer, Gökduman, Ali Rıza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: OceanSide Publications, Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5244280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683247
http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/ar.2016.7.0181
_version_ 1782496679467941888
author Bilici, Suat
Durna, Yusuf Muhammed
Yigit, Ozgur
Karatas, Aysel
Cimen, Cansu
Fincancı, Muzaffer
Gökduman, Ali Rıza
author_facet Bilici, Suat
Durna, Yusuf Muhammed
Yigit, Ozgur
Karatas, Aysel
Cimen, Cansu
Fincancı, Muzaffer
Gökduman, Ali Rıza
author_sort Bilici, Suat
collection PubMed
description AIM: To examine the effects, after septoplasty, of local antibiotic pomades as an alternative to prophylactic antibiotic use, which is a controversial matter among the otolaryngologists, on nasal flora and bacterial growth. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Nasal packings placed after septoplasty surgery to provide septal stabilization and bleeding control pose a risk in terms of infection. In this study, 106 patients, who were examined by comparing mupirocin- and fusidic acid–soaked packings and antibiotic-free packings, were divided into three groups. Nasal cultures were obtained from each patient twice, before the surgery and on the second day immediately after the packings were removed, and the culture results were statistically compared. RESULTS: In the mupirocin group (group 2), postoperative normal flora growth rate was significantly higher than in the fusidic acid group (group 3) and the antibiotic-free group (group 1) (p < 0.024). In the mupirocin group (group 2), the gram-positive growth rate in the postoperative period showed a significant decrease when compared when the preoperative period (p < 0.05) (5.7%). In the fusidic acid group (group 3), the postoperative gram-positive rate showed a significant decrease compared with the preoperative period (p < 0.05). In group 2, the postoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus rate showed a significant decrease than in the preoperative period (2.9%) (p < 0.05). Similarly, in group 3, the postoperative methicillin-resistant S. aureus rate showed a significant decrease compared with that of the preoperative period (11.1%) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Use of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–soaked nasal packings after septoplasty significantly decreased, especially, postoperative gram-positive bacterial growth in nasal cultures. Although systemic antibiotherapy was not administered, the lack of local and systemic infection findings was an important result that we obtained in terms of clinical use. Usage advantages of mupirocin and fusidic acid soaked packings are an easily applicable, cost-effective, and safe method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5244280
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher OceanSide Publications, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52442802017-01-23 The effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile Bilici, Suat Durna, Yusuf Muhammed Yigit, Ozgur Karatas, Aysel Cimen, Cansu Fincancı, Muzaffer Gökduman, Ali Rıza Allergy Rhinol (Providence) Articles AIM: To examine the effects, after septoplasty, of local antibiotic pomades as an alternative to prophylactic antibiotic use, which is a controversial matter among the otolaryngologists, on nasal flora and bacterial growth. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Nasal packings placed after septoplasty surgery to provide septal stabilization and bleeding control pose a risk in terms of infection. In this study, 106 patients, who were examined by comparing mupirocin- and fusidic acid–soaked packings and antibiotic-free packings, were divided into three groups. Nasal cultures were obtained from each patient twice, before the surgery and on the second day immediately after the packings were removed, and the culture results were statistically compared. RESULTS: In the mupirocin group (group 2), postoperative normal flora growth rate was significantly higher than in the fusidic acid group (group 3) and the antibiotic-free group (group 1) (p < 0.024). In the mupirocin group (group 2), the gram-positive growth rate in the postoperative period showed a significant decrease when compared when the preoperative period (p < 0.05) (5.7%). In the fusidic acid group (group 3), the postoperative gram-positive rate showed a significant decrease compared with the preoperative period (p < 0.05). In group 2, the postoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus rate showed a significant decrease than in the preoperative period (2.9%) (p < 0.05). Similarly, in group 3, the postoperative methicillin-resistant S. aureus rate showed a significant decrease compared with that of the preoperative period (11.1%) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Use of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–soaked nasal packings after septoplasty significantly decreased, especially, postoperative gram-positive bacterial growth in nasal cultures. Although systemic antibiotherapy was not administered, the lack of local and systemic infection findings was an important result that we obtained in terms of clinical use. Usage advantages of mupirocin and fusidic acid soaked packings are an easily applicable, cost-effective, and safe method. OceanSide Publications, Inc. 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5244280/ /pubmed/28683247 http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/ar.2016.7.0181 Text en Copyright © 2016, OceanSide Publications, Inc., U.S.A. This publication is provided under the terms of the Creative Commons Public License ("CCPL" or "License"), in attribution 3.0 unported (Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND)), further described at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode. The work is protected by copyright and/or other applicable law. Any use of the work other then as authorized under this license or copyright law is prohibited.
spellingShingle Articles
Bilici, Suat
Durna, Yusuf Muhammed
Yigit, Ozgur
Karatas, Aysel
Cimen, Cansu
Fincancı, Muzaffer
Gökduman, Ali Rıza
The effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile
title The effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile
title_full The effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile
title_fullStr The effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile
title_full_unstemmed The effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile
title_short The effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile
title_sort effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5244280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683247
http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/ar.2016.7.0181
work_keys_str_mv AT bilicisuat theeffectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile
AT durnayusufmuhammed theeffectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile
AT yigitozgur theeffectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile
AT karatasaysel theeffectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile
AT cimencansu theeffectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile
AT fincancımuzaffer theeffectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile
AT gokdumanalirıza theeffectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile
AT bilicisuat effectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile
AT durnayusufmuhammed effectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile
AT yigitozgur effectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile
AT karatasaysel effectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile
AT cimencansu effectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile
AT fincancımuzaffer effectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile
AT gokdumanalirıza effectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile