Cargando…
The effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile
AIM: To examine the effects, after septoplasty, of local antibiotic pomades as an alternative to prophylactic antibiotic use, which is a controversial matter among the otolaryngologists, on nasal flora and bacterial growth. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Nasal packings placed after septoplasty surgery to prov...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
OceanSide Publications, Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5244280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683247 http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/ar.2016.7.0181 |
_version_ | 1782496679467941888 |
---|---|
author | Bilici, Suat Durna, Yusuf Muhammed Yigit, Ozgur Karatas, Aysel Cimen, Cansu Fincancı, Muzaffer Gökduman, Ali Rıza |
author_facet | Bilici, Suat Durna, Yusuf Muhammed Yigit, Ozgur Karatas, Aysel Cimen, Cansu Fincancı, Muzaffer Gökduman, Ali Rıza |
author_sort | Bilici, Suat |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To examine the effects, after septoplasty, of local antibiotic pomades as an alternative to prophylactic antibiotic use, which is a controversial matter among the otolaryngologists, on nasal flora and bacterial growth. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Nasal packings placed after septoplasty surgery to provide septal stabilization and bleeding control pose a risk in terms of infection. In this study, 106 patients, who were examined by comparing mupirocin- and fusidic acid–soaked packings and antibiotic-free packings, were divided into three groups. Nasal cultures were obtained from each patient twice, before the surgery and on the second day immediately after the packings were removed, and the culture results were statistically compared. RESULTS: In the mupirocin group (group 2), postoperative normal flora growth rate was significantly higher than in the fusidic acid group (group 3) and the antibiotic-free group (group 1) (p < 0.024). In the mupirocin group (group 2), the gram-positive growth rate in the postoperative period showed a significant decrease when compared when the preoperative period (p < 0.05) (5.7%). In the fusidic acid group (group 3), the postoperative gram-positive rate showed a significant decrease compared with the preoperative period (p < 0.05). In group 2, the postoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus rate showed a significant decrease than in the preoperative period (2.9%) (p < 0.05). Similarly, in group 3, the postoperative methicillin-resistant S. aureus rate showed a significant decrease compared with that of the preoperative period (11.1%) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Use of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–soaked nasal packings after septoplasty significantly decreased, especially, postoperative gram-positive bacterial growth in nasal cultures. Although systemic antibiotherapy was not administered, the lack of local and systemic infection findings was an important result that we obtained in terms of clinical use. Usage advantages of mupirocin and fusidic acid soaked packings are an easily applicable, cost-effective, and safe method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5244280 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | OceanSide Publications, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52442802017-01-23 The effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile Bilici, Suat Durna, Yusuf Muhammed Yigit, Ozgur Karatas, Aysel Cimen, Cansu Fincancı, Muzaffer Gökduman, Ali Rıza Allergy Rhinol (Providence) Articles AIM: To examine the effects, after septoplasty, of local antibiotic pomades as an alternative to prophylactic antibiotic use, which is a controversial matter among the otolaryngologists, on nasal flora and bacterial growth. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Nasal packings placed after septoplasty surgery to provide septal stabilization and bleeding control pose a risk in terms of infection. In this study, 106 patients, who were examined by comparing mupirocin- and fusidic acid–soaked packings and antibiotic-free packings, were divided into three groups. Nasal cultures were obtained from each patient twice, before the surgery and on the second day immediately after the packings were removed, and the culture results were statistically compared. RESULTS: In the mupirocin group (group 2), postoperative normal flora growth rate was significantly higher than in the fusidic acid group (group 3) and the antibiotic-free group (group 1) (p < 0.024). In the mupirocin group (group 2), the gram-positive growth rate in the postoperative period showed a significant decrease when compared when the preoperative period (p < 0.05) (5.7%). In the fusidic acid group (group 3), the postoperative gram-positive rate showed a significant decrease compared with the preoperative period (p < 0.05). In group 2, the postoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus rate showed a significant decrease than in the preoperative period (2.9%) (p < 0.05). Similarly, in group 3, the postoperative methicillin-resistant S. aureus rate showed a significant decrease compared with that of the preoperative period (11.1%) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Use of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–soaked nasal packings after septoplasty significantly decreased, especially, postoperative gram-positive bacterial growth in nasal cultures. Although systemic antibiotherapy was not administered, the lack of local and systemic infection findings was an important result that we obtained in terms of clinical use. Usage advantages of mupirocin and fusidic acid soaked packings are an easily applicable, cost-effective, and safe method. OceanSide Publications, Inc. 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5244280/ /pubmed/28683247 http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/ar.2016.7.0181 Text en Copyright © 2016, OceanSide Publications, Inc., U.S.A. This publication is provided under the terms of the Creative Commons Public License ("CCPL" or "License"), in attribution 3.0 unported (Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND)), further described at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode. The work is protected by copyright and/or other applicable law. Any use of the work other then as authorized under this license or copyright law is prohibited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Bilici, Suat Durna, Yusuf Muhammed Yigit, Ozgur Karatas, Aysel Cimen, Cansu Fincancı, Muzaffer Gökduman, Ali Rıza The effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile |
title | The effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile |
title_full | The effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile |
title_fullStr | The effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile |
title_short | The effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile |
title_sort | effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid–nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5244280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683247 http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/ar.2016.7.0181 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bilicisuat theeffectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile AT durnayusufmuhammed theeffectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile AT yigitozgur theeffectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile AT karatasaysel theeffectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile AT cimencansu theeffectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile AT fincancımuzaffer theeffectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile AT gokdumanalirıza theeffectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile AT bilicisuat effectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile AT durnayusufmuhammed effectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile AT yigitozgur effectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile AT karatasaysel effectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile AT cimencansu effectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile AT fincancımuzaffer effectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile AT gokdumanalirıza effectofmupirocinandfusidicacidnasalpackingsplacedafterseptoplastyonthenasalbacterialprofile |