Cargando…

Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in rural India: a mixed methods approach

BACKGROUND: Stigma related to mental health is a major barrier to help-seeking resulting in a large treatment gap in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This study assessed changes in knowledge, attitude and behaviour, and stigma related to help-seeking among participants exposed to an anti-sti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maulik, P. K., Devarapalli, S., Kallakuri, S., Tewari, A., Chilappagari, S., Koschorke, M., Thornicroft, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5244444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27804895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716002804
_version_ 1782496701466017792
author Maulik, P. K.
Devarapalli, S.
Kallakuri, S.
Tewari, A.
Chilappagari, S.
Koschorke, M.
Thornicroft, G.
author_facet Maulik, P. K.
Devarapalli, S.
Kallakuri, S.
Tewari, A.
Chilappagari, S.
Koschorke, M.
Thornicroft, G.
author_sort Maulik, P. K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stigma related to mental health is a major barrier to help-seeking resulting in a large treatment gap in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This study assessed changes in knowledge, attitude and behaviour, and stigma related to help-seeking among participants exposed to an anti-stigma campaign. METHOD: The campaign, using multi-media interventions, was part of the SMART Mental Health Project, conducted for 3 months, across 42 villages in rural Andhra Pradesh, in South India. Mixed-methods evaluation was conducted in two villages using a pre-post design. RESULTS: A total of 1576 and 2100 participants were interviewed, at pre- and post-intervention phases of the campaign. Knowledge was not increased. Attitudes and behaviours improved significantly (p < 0.01). Stigma related to help-seeking reduced significantly (p < 0.05). Social contact and drama were the most beneficial interventions identified during qualitative interviews. CONCLUSION: The results showed that the campaign was beneficial and led to improvement of attitude and behaviours related to mental health and reduction in stigma related to help-seeking. Social contact was the most effective intervention. The study had implications for future research in LMIC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5244444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52444442017-02-01 Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in rural India: a mixed methods approach Maulik, P. K. Devarapalli, S. Kallakuri, S. Tewari, A. Chilappagari, S. Koschorke, M. Thornicroft, G. Psychol Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Stigma related to mental health is a major barrier to help-seeking resulting in a large treatment gap in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This study assessed changes in knowledge, attitude and behaviour, and stigma related to help-seeking among participants exposed to an anti-stigma campaign. METHOD: The campaign, using multi-media interventions, was part of the SMART Mental Health Project, conducted for 3 months, across 42 villages in rural Andhra Pradesh, in South India. Mixed-methods evaluation was conducted in two villages using a pre-post design. RESULTS: A total of 1576 and 2100 participants were interviewed, at pre- and post-intervention phases of the campaign. Knowledge was not increased. Attitudes and behaviours improved significantly (p < 0.01). Stigma related to help-seeking reduced significantly (p < 0.05). Social contact and drama were the most beneficial interventions identified during qualitative interviews. CONCLUSION: The results showed that the campaign was beneficial and led to improvement of attitude and behaviours related to mental health and reduction in stigma related to help-seeking. Social contact was the most effective intervention. The study had implications for future research in LMIC. Cambridge University Press 2017-02 2016-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5244444/ /pubmed/27804895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716002804 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Maulik, P. K.
Devarapalli, S.
Kallakuri, S.
Tewari, A.
Chilappagari, S.
Koschorke, M.
Thornicroft, G.
Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in rural India: a mixed methods approach
title Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in rural India: a mixed methods approach
title_full Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in rural India: a mixed methods approach
title_fullStr Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in rural India: a mixed methods approach
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in rural India: a mixed methods approach
title_short Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in rural India: a mixed methods approach
title_sort evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in rural india: a mixed methods approach
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5244444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27804895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716002804
work_keys_str_mv AT maulikpk evaluationofanantistigmacampaignrelatedtocommonmentaldisordersinruralindiaamixedmethodsapproach
AT devarapallis evaluationofanantistigmacampaignrelatedtocommonmentaldisordersinruralindiaamixedmethodsapproach
AT kallakuris evaluationofanantistigmacampaignrelatedtocommonmentaldisordersinruralindiaamixedmethodsapproach
AT tewaria evaluationofanantistigmacampaignrelatedtocommonmentaldisordersinruralindiaamixedmethodsapproach
AT chilappagaris evaluationofanantistigmacampaignrelatedtocommonmentaldisordersinruralindiaamixedmethodsapproach
AT koschorkem evaluationofanantistigmacampaignrelatedtocommonmentaldisordersinruralindiaamixedmethodsapproach
AT thornicroftg evaluationofanantistigmacampaignrelatedtocommonmentaldisordersinruralindiaamixedmethodsapproach