Cargando…
Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in rural India: a mixed methods approach
BACKGROUND: Stigma related to mental health is a major barrier to help-seeking resulting in a large treatment gap in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This study assessed changes in knowledge, attitude and behaviour, and stigma related to help-seeking among participants exposed to an anti-sti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5244444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27804895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716002804 |
_version_ | 1782496701466017792 |
---|---|
author | Maulik, P. K. Devarapalli, S. Kallakuri, S. Tewari, A. Chilappagari, S. Koschorke, M. Thornicroft, G. |
author_facet | Maulik, P. K. Devarapalli, S. Kallakuri, S. Tewari, A. Chilappagari, S. Koschorke, M. Thornicroft, G. |
author_sort | Maulik, P. K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stigma related to mental health is a major barrier to help-seeking resulting in a large treatment gap in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This study assessed changes in knowledge, attitude and behaviour, and stigma related to help-seeking among participants exposed to an anti-stigma campaign. METHOD: The campaign, using multi-media interventions, was part of the SMART Mental Health Project, conducted for 3 months, across 42 villages in rural Andhra Pradesh, in South India. Mixed-methods evaluation was conducted in two villages using a pre-post design. RESULTS: A total of 1576 and 2100 participants were interviewed, at pre- and post-intervention phases of the campaign. Knowledge was not increased. Attitudes and behaviours improved significantly (p < 0.01). Stigma related to help-seeking reduced significantly (p < 0.05). Social contact and drama were the most beneficial interventions identified during qualitative interviews. CONCLUSION: The results showed that the campaign was beneficial and led to improvement of attitude and behaviours related to mental health and reduction in stigma related to help-seeking. Social contact was the most effective intervention. The study had implications for future research in LMIC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5244444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52444442017-02-01 Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in rural India: a mixed methods approach Maulik, P. K. Devarapalli, S. Kallakuri, S. Tewari, A. Chilappagari, S. Koschorke, M. Thornicroft, G. Psychol Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Stigma related to mental health is a major barrier to help-seeking resulting in a large treatment gap in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This study assessed changes in knowledge, attitude and behaviour, and stigma related to help-seeking among participants exposed to an anti-stigma campaign. METHOD: The campaign, using multi-media interventions, was part of the SMART Mental Health Project, conducted for 3 months, across 42 villages in rural Andhra Pradesh, in South India. Mixed-methods evaluation was conducted in two villages using a pre-post design. RESULTS: A total of 1576 and 2100 participants were interviewed, at pre- and post-intervention phases of the campaign. Knowledge was not increased. Attitudes and behaviours improved significantly (p < 0.01). Stigma related to help-seeking reduced significantly (p < 0.05). Social contact and drama were the most beneficial interventions identified during qualitative interviews. CONCLUSION: The results showed that the campaign was beneficial and led to improvement of attitude and behaviours related to mental health and reduction in stigma related to help-seeking. Social contact was the most effective intervention. The study had implications for future research in LMIC. Cambridge University Press 2017-02 2016-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5244444/ /pubmed/27804895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716002804 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Maulik, P. K. Devarapalli, S. Kallakuri, S. Tewari, A. Chilappagari, S. Koschorke, M. Thornicroft, G. Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in rural India: a mixed methods approach |
title | Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in
rural India: a mixed methods approach |
title_full | Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in
rural India: a mixed methods approach |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in
rural India: a mixed methods approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in
rural India: a mixed methods approach |
title_short | Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in
rural India: a mixed methods approach |
title_sort | evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in
rural india: a mixed methods approach |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5244444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27804895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716002804 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maulikpk evaluationofanantistigmacampaignrelatedtocommonmentaldisordersinruralindiaamixedmethodsapproach AT devarapallis evaluationofanantistigmacampaignrelatedtocommonmentaldisordersinruralindiaamixedmethodsapproach AT kallakuris evaluationofanantistigmacampaignrelatedtocommonmentaldisordersinruralindiaamixedmethodsapproach AT tewaria evaluationofanantistigmacampaignrelatedtocommonmentaldisordersinruralindiaamixedmethodsapproach AT chilappagaris evaluationofanantistigmacampaignrelatedtocommonmentaldisordersinruralindiaamixedmethodsapproach AT koschorkem evaluationofanantistigmacampaignrelatedtocommonmentaldisordersinruralindiaamixedmethodsapproach AT thornicroftg evaluationofanantistigmacampaignrelatedtocommonmentaldisordersinruralindiaamixedmethodsapproach |