Cargando…
Use of a self-rating scale to monitor depression severity in recurrent GP consultations in primary care – does it really make a difference? A randomised controlled study
BACKGROUND: Little information is available about whether the use of self-assessment instruments in primary care affects depression course and outcome. The purpose was to evaluate whether using a depression self-rating scale in recurrent person-centred GP consultations affected depression severity,...
Autores principales: | Wikberg, C., Westman, J., Petersson, E-L., Larsson, M. E. H., André, M., Eggertsen, R., Thorn, J., Ågren, H., Björkelund, C. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5244530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28103816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0578-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Effects on work ability, job strain and quality of life of monitoring depression using a self-assessment instrument in recurrent general practitioner consultations: A randomized controlled study
por: Petersson, E-L., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Patients’ perspectives on the use of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale self-assessment version in primary care
por: Wikberg, Carl, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Process evaluation of a cluster randomised intervention in Swedish primary care: using care managers in collaborative care to improve care quality for patients with depression
por: Svenningsson, I., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study
por: Holst, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Targeted encouragement of GP consultations for possible cancer symptoms: a randomised controlled trial
por: Laake, Jean-Pierre, et al.
Publicado: (2020)