Cargando…

The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the primary cause of infant death worldwide. A short cervix in the second trimester of pregnancy is a risk factor for preterm birth. In specific patient cohorts, vaginal progesterone reduces this risk. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we undertook a prospective study in w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kindinger, Lindsay M., Bennett, Phillip R., Lee, Yun S, Marchesi, Julian R., Smith, Ann, Cacciatore, Stefano, Holmes, Elaine, Nicholson, Jeremy K., Teoh, T. G., MacIntyre, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5244550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28103952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0223-9
_version_ 1782496714880450560
author Kindinger, Lindsay M.
Bennett, Phillip R.
Lee, Yun S
Marchesi, Julian R.
Smith, Ann
Cacciatore, Stefano
Holmes, Elaine
Nicholson, Jeremy K.
Teoh, T. G.
MacIntyre, David A.
author_facet Kindinger, Lindsay M.
Bennett, Phillip R.
Lee, Yun S
Marchesi, Julian R.
Smith, Ann
Cacciatore, Stefano
Holmes, Elaine
Nicholson, Jeremy K.
Teoh, T. G.
MacIntyre, David A.
author_sort Kindinger, Lindsay M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the primary cause of infant death worldwide. A short cervix in the second trimester of pregnancy is a risk factor for preterm birth. In specific patient cohorts, vaginal progesterone reduces this risk. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we undertook a prospective study in women at risk of preterm birth (n = 161) to assess (1) the relationship between vaginal microbiota and cervical length in the second trimester and preterm birth risk and (2) the impact of vaginal progesterone on vaginal bacterial communities in women with a short cervix. RESULTS: Lactobacillus iners dominance at 16 weeks of gestation was significantly associated with both a short cervix <25 mm (n = 15, P < 0.05) and preterm birth <34(+0) weeks (n = 18; P < 0.01; 69% PPV). In contrast, Lactobacillus crispatus dominance was highly predictive of term birth (n = 127, 98% PPV). Cervical shortening and preterm birth were not associated with vaginal dysbiosis. A longitudinal characterization of vaginal microbiota (<18, 22, 28, and 34 weeks) was then undertaken in women receiving vaginal progesterone (400 mg/OD, n = 25) versus controls (n = 42). Progesterone did not alter vaginal bacterial community structure nor reduce L. iners-associated preterm birth (<34 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: L. iners dominance of the vaginal microbiota at 16 weeks of gestation is a risk factor for preterm birth, whereas L. crispatus dominance is protective against preterm birth. Vaginal progesterone does not appear to impact the pregnancy vaginal microbiota. Patients and clinicians who may be concerned about “infection risk” associated with the use of a vaginal pessary during high-risk pregnancy can be reassured. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0223-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5244550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52445502017-01-23 The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk Kindinger, Lindsay M. Bennett, Phillip R. Lee, Yun S Marchesi, Julian R. Smith, Ann Cacciatore, Stefano Holmes, Elaine Nicholson, Jeremy K. Teoh, T. G. MacIntyre, David A. Microbiome Research BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the primary cause of infant death worldwide. A short cervix in the second trimester of pregnancy is a risk factor for preterm birth. In specific patient cohorts, vaginal progesterone reduces this risk. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we undertook a prospective study in women at risk of preterm birth (n = 161) to assess (1) the relationship between vaginal microbiota and cervical length in the second trimester and preterm birth risk and (2) the impact of vaginal progesterone on vaginal bacterial communities in women with a short cervix. RESULTS: Lactobacillus iners dominance at 16 weeks of gestation was significantly associated with both a short cervix <25 mm (n = 15, P < 0.05) and preterm birth <34(+0) weeks (n = 18; P < 0.01; 69% PPV). In contrast, Lactobacillus crispatus dominance was highly predictive of term birth (n = 127, 98% PPV). Cervical shortening and preterm birth were not associated with vaginal dysbiosis. A longitudinal characterization of vaginal microbiota (<18, 22, 28, and 34 weeks) was then undertaken in women receiving vaginal progesterone (400 mg/OD, n = 25) versus controls (n = 42). Progesterone did not alter vaginal bacterial community structure nor reduce L. iners-associated preterm birth (<34 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: L. iners dominance of the vaginal microbiota at 16 weeks of gestation is a risk factor for preterm birth, whereas L. crispatus dominance is protective against preterm birth. Vaginal progesterone does not appear to impact the pregnancy vaginal microbiota. Patients and clinicians who may be concerned about “infection risk” associated with the use of a vaginal pessary during high-risk pregnancy can be reassured. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0223-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5244550/ /pubmed/28103952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0223-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kindinger, Lindsay M.
Bennett, Phillip R.
Lee, Yun S
Marchesi, Julian R.
Smith, Ann
Cacciatore, Stefano
Holmes, Elaine
Nicholson, Jeremy K.
Teoh, T. G.
MacIntyre, David A.
The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk
title The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk
title_full The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk
title_fullStr The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk
title_full_unstemmed The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk
title_short The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk
title_sort interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5244550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28103952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0223-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kindingerlindsaym theinteractionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT bennettphillipr theinteractionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT leeyuns theinteractionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT marchesijulianr theinteractionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT smithann theinteractionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT cacciatorestefano theinteractionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT holmeselaine theinteractionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT nicholsonjeremyk theinteractionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT teohtg theinteractionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT macintyredavida theinteractionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT kindingerlindsaym interactionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT bennettphillipr interactionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT leeyuns interactionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT marchesijulianr interactionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT smithann interactionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT cacciatorestefano interactionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT holmeselaine interactionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT nicholsonjeremyk interactionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT teohtg interactionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk
AT macintyredavida interactionbetweenvaginalmicrobiotacervicallengthandvaginalprogesteronetreatmentforpretermbirthrisk