Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of surgical excision versus Mohs micrographic surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancer: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Nonmelanoma skin cancer rates are increasing worldwide. Mohs micrographic surgery and surgical excision (SE) are the two treatment methods for this type of cancer. The current paper aims at determining and comparing the cost-effectiveness of SE and Mohs micrographic surgery. MATERIALS AN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nassiripour, Leila, Amirsadri, Mohammadreza, Tabatabaeian, Maryam, Maracy, Mohammad Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5244688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28163737
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-1995.192507
_version_ 1782496739416080384
author Nassiripour, Leila
Amirsadri, Mohammadreza
Tabatabaeian, Maryam
Maracy, Mohammad Reza
author_facet Nassiripour, Leila
Amirsadri, Mohammadreza
Tabatabaeian, Maryam
Maracy, Mohammad Reza
author_sort Nassiripour, Leila
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nonmelanoma skin cancer rates are increasing worldwide. Mohs micrographic surgery and surgical excision (SE) are the two treatment methods for this type of cancer. The current paper aims at determining and comparing the cost-effectiveness of SE and Mohs micrographic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current study has a retrospective cohort design. A number of 630 patients suffering from nonmelanoma skin cancer who at some point of time during the years 2007–2014 referred to the Al-Zahra or Seyed Al-Shohada Hospitals in Isfahan. Patients were followed up for 4 years, and then the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the two methods was calculated. RESULTS: The average (minimum-maximum) cost of the SE and Mohs surgery methods in Iran was obtained as 18,550,170 (2335,800–260,898,262) and 12,236,890 (6488,340–41,161,700) Iranian Rial, respectively. Recurrence percentage was also reported as 7.9% and 8.7% for SE and Mohs micrographic surgery, respectively (P > 0.05). The ICER of SE in comparison with Mohs surgery was calculated as 7891,600 Iranian Rials per recurrence avoided. CONCLUSION: Mohs surgery is less expensive than SE, it seems like Mohs surgery is more affordable, however further studies in different populations of the country are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5244688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52446882017-02-03 Cost-effectiveness of surgical excision versus Mohs micrographic surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancer: A retrospective cohort study Nassiripour, Leila Amirsadri, Mohammadreza Tabatabaeian, Maryam Maracy, Mohammad Reza J Res Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Nonmelanoma skin cancer rates are increasing worldwide. Mohs micrographic surgery and surgical excision (SE) are the two treatment methods for this type of cancer. The current paper aims at determining and comparing the cost-effectiveness of SE and Mohs micrographic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current study has a retrospective cohort design. A number of 630 patients suffering from nonmelanoma skin cancer who at some point of time during the years 2007–2014 referred to the Al-Zahra or Seyed Al-Shohada Hospitals in Isfahan. Patients were followed up for 4 years, and then the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the two methods was calculated. RESULTS: The average (minimum-maximum) cost of the SE and Mohs surgery methods in Iran was obtained as 18,550,170 (2335,800–260,898,262) and 12,236,890 (6488,340–41,161,700) Iranian Rial, respectively. Recurrence percentage was also reported as 7.9% and 8.7% for SE and Mohs micrographic surgery, respectively (P > 0.05). The ICER of SE in comparison with Mohs surgery was calculated as 7891,600 Iranian Rials per recurrence avoided. CONCLUSION: Mohs surgery is less expensive than SE, it seems like Mohs surgery is more affordable, however further studies in different populations of the country are needed. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5244688/ /pubmed/28163737 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-1995.192507 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Journal of Research in Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nassiripour, Leila
Amirsadri, Mohammadreza
Tabatabaeian, Maryam
Maracy, Mohammad Reza
Cost-effectiveness of surgical excision versus Mohs micrographic surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancer: A retrospective cohort study
title Cost-effectiveness of surgical excision versus Mohs micrographic surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancer: A retrospective cohort study
title_full Cost-effectiveness of surgical excision versus Mohs micrographic surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancer: A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of surgical excision versus Mohs micrographic surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancer: A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of surgical excision versus Mohs micrographic surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancer: A retrospective cohort study
title_short Cost-effectiveness of surgical excision versus Mohs micrographic surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancer: A retrospective cohort study
title_sort cost-effectiveness of surgical excision versus mohs micrographic surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancer: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5244688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28163737
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-1995.192507
work_keys_str_mv AT nassiripourleila costeffectivenessofsurgicalexcisionversusmohsmicrographicsurgeryfornonmelanomaskincanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT amirsadrimohammadreza costeffectivenessofsurgicalexcisionversusmohsmicrographicsurgeryfornonmelanomaskincanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT tabatabaeianmaryam costeffectivenessofsurgicalexcisionversusmohsmicrographicsurgeryfornonmelanomaskincanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT maracymohammadreza costeffectivenessofsurgicalexcisionversusmohsmicrographicsurgeryfornonmelanomaskincanceraretrospectivecohortstudy