Cargando…
Detecting communicative intent in a computerised test of joint attention
The successful navigation of social interactions depends on a range of cognitive faculties—including the ability to achieve joint attention with others to share information and experiences. We investigated the influence that intention monitoring processes have on gaze-following response times during...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5244879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28123912 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2899 |
_version_ | 1782496755138428928 |
---|---|
author | Caruana, Nathan McArthur, Genevieve Woolgar, Alexandra Brock, Jon |
author_facet | Caruana, Nathan McArthur, Genevieve Woolgar, Alexandra Brock, Jon |
author_sort | Caruana, Nathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The successful navigation of social interactions depends on a range of cognitive faculties—including the ability to achieve joint attention with others to share information and experiences. We investigated the influence that intention monitoring processes have on gaze-following response times during joint attention. We employed a virtual reality task in which 16 healthy adults engaged in a collaborative game with a virtual partner to locate a target in a visual array. In the Search task, the virtual partner was programmed to engage in non-communicative gaze shifts in search of the target, establish eye contact, and then display a communicative gaze shift to guide the participant to the target. In the NoSearch task, the virtual partner simply established eye contact and then made a single communicative gaze shift towards the target (i.e., there were no non-communicative gaze shifts in search of the target). Thus, only the Search task required participants to monitor their partner’s communicative intent before responding to joint attention bids. We found that gaze following was significantly slower in the Search task than the NoSearch task. However, the same effect on response times was not observed when participants completed non-social control versions of the Search and NoSearch tasks, in which the avatar’s gaze was replaced by arrow cues. These data demonstrate that the intention monitoring processes involved in differentiating communicative and non-communicative gaze shifts during the Search task had a measurable influence on subsequent joint attention behaviour. The empirical and methodological implications of these findings for the fields of autism and social neuroscience will be discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5244879 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52448792017-01-25 Detecting communicative intent in a computerised test of joint attention Caruana, Nathan McArthur, Genevieve Woolgar, Alexandra Brock, Jon PeerJ Neuroscience The successful navigation of social interactions depends on a range of cognitive faculties—including the ability to achieve joint attention with others to share information and experiences. We investigated the influence that intention monitoring processes have on gaze-following response times during joint attention. We employed a virtual reality task in which 16 healthy adults engaged in a collaborative game with a virtual partner to locate a target in a visual array. In the Search task, the virtual partner was programmed to engage in non-communicative gaze shifts in search of the target, establish eye contact, and then display a communicative gaze shift to guide the participant to the target. In the NoSearch task, the virtual partner simply established eye contact and then made a single communicative gaze shift towards the target (i.e., there were no non-communicative gaze shifts in search of the target). Thus, only the Search task required participants to monitor their partner’s communicative intent before responding to joint attention bids. We found that gaze following was significantly slower in the Search task than the NoSearch task. However, the same effect on response times was not observed when participants completed non-social control versions of the Search and NoSearch tasks, in which the avatar’s gaze was replaced by arrow cues. These data demonstrate that the intention monitoring processes involved in differentiating communicative and non-communicative gaze shifts during the Search task had a measurable influence on subsequent joint attention behaviour. The empirical and methodological implications of these findings for the fields of autism and social neuroscience will be discussed. PeerJ Inc. 2017-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5244879/ /pubmed/28123912 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2899 Text en ©2017 Caruana et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Caruana, Nathan McArthur, Genevieve Woolgar, Alexandra Brock, Jon Detecting communicative intent in a computerised test of joint attention |
title | Detecting communicative intent in a computerised test of joint attention |
title_full | Detecting communicative intent in a computerised test of joint attention |
title_fullStr | Detecting communicative intent in a computerised test of joint attention |
title_full_unstemmed | Detecting communicative intent in a computerised test of joint attention |
title_short | Detecting communicative intent in a computerised test of joint attention |
title_sort | detecting communicative intent in a computerised test of joint attention |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5244879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28123912 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2899 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caruananathan detectingcommunicativeintentinacomputerisedtestofjointattention AT mcarthurgenevieve detectingcommunicativeintentinacomputerisedtestofjointattention AT woolgaralexandra detectingcommunicativeintentinacomputerisedtestofjointattention AT brockjon detectingcommunicativeintentinacomputerisedtestofjointattention |