Cargando…

Comparison of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence analysis and conventional culture in the environmental survey of a hospital

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial infection is one of the most common complications within health care facilities. Certain studies have reported outbreaks resulting from contaminated hospital environments. Although the identification of bacteria in the environment can readily be achieved using culturing method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manaka, Akihiro, Tokue, Yutaka, Murakami, Masami
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5247807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28116119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40780-017-0074-y
_version_ 1782497145356550144
author Manaka, Akihiro
Tokue, Yutaka
Murakami, Masami
author_facet Manaka, Akihiro
Tokue, Yutaka
Murakami, Masami
author_sort Manaka, Akihiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nosocomial infection is one of the most common complications within health care facilities. Certain studies have reported outbreaks resulting from contaminated hospital environments. Although the identification of bacteria in the environment can readily be achieved using culturing methods, these methods detect live bacteria. Sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene is recognized to be effective for bacterial identification. In this study, we surveyed wards where drug-resistant bacteria had been isolated and compared conventional culture methods with 16S rRNA gene sequencing methods. METHODS: Samples were collected using sterile swabs from two wards (northern and southern) at Gunma University Hospital contaminated by Acinetobacter sp.. We extracted DNA directly from the swabs. Following extraction, the DNA was amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The PCR products were cloned using the plasmid vector. The plasmid DNA were sequenced, and identification were performed using database. 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses were compared conventional culture methods. RESULTS: In the northern ward, Acinetobacter sp. was detected from only two of 14 samples using the culture method. In contrast, 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis detected Acinetobacter sp. from seven of 14 samples. Drug-resistant Acinetobacter sp. was isolated from bathrooms of the southern ward and was detected from four of seven samples using the culture method in comparison with six of seven samples by 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular biological analysis showed a higher sensitivity to detect specific bacteria and detected a greater number of species than the culture method. Our results suggest that 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis is useful to identify range of contamination which were not found in conventional culture method. When a nosocomial outbreak cannot be adequately controlled, molecular biological analysis may serve as a useful tool for environmental surveys in hospitals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5247807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52478072017-01-23 Comparison of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence analysis and conventional culture in the environmental survey of a hospital Manaka, Akihiro Tokue, Yutaka Murakami, Masami J Pharm Health Care Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: Nosocomial infection is one of the most common complications within health care facilities. Certain studies have reported outbreaks resulting from contaminated hospital environments. Although the identification of bacteria in the environment can readily be achieved using culturing methods, these methods detect live bacteria. Sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene is recognized to be effective for bacterial identification. In this study, we surveyed wards where drug-resistant bacteria had been isolated and compared conventional culture methods with 16S rRNA gene sequencing methods. METHODS: Samples were collected using sterile swabs from two wards (northern and southern) at Gunma University Hospital contaminated by Acinetobacter sp.. We extracted DNA directly from the swabs. Following extraction, the DNA was amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The PCR products were cloned using the plasmid vector. The plasmid DNA were sequenced, and identification were performed using database. 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses were compared conventional culture methods. RESULTS: In the northern ward, Acinetobacter sp. was detected from only two of 14 samples using the culture method. In contrast, 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis detected Acinetobacter sp. from seven of 14 samples. Drug-resistant Acinetobacter sp. was isolated from bathrooms of the southern ward and was detected from four of seven samples using the culture method in comparison with six of seven samples by 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular biological analysis showed a higher sensitivity to detect specific bacteria and detected a greater number of species than the culture method. Our results suggest that 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis is useful to identify range of contamination which were not found in conventional culture method. When a nosocomial outbreak cannot be adequately controlled, molecular biological analysis may serve as a useful tool for environmental surveys in hospitals. BioMed Central 2017-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5247807/ /pubmed/28116119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40780-017-0074-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Manaka, Akihiro
Tokue, Yutaka
Murakami, Masami
Comparison of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence analysis and conventional culture in the environmental survey of a hospital
title Comparison of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence analysis and conventional culture in the environmental survey of a hospital
title_full Comparison of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence analysis and conventional culture in the environmental survey of a hospital
title_fullStr Comparison of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence analysis and conventional culture in the environmental survey of a hospital
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence analysis and conventional culture in the environmental survey of a hospital
title_short Comparison of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence analysis and conventional culture in the environmental survey of a hospital
title_sort comparison of 16s ribosomal rna gene sequence analysis and conventional culture in the environmental survey of a hospital
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5247807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28116119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40780-017-0074-y
work_keys_str_mv AT manakaakihiro comparisonof16sribosomalrnagenesequenceanalysisandconventionalcultureintheenvironmentalsurveyofahospital
AT tokueyutaka comparisonof16sribosomalrnagenesequenceanalysisandconventionalcultureintheenvironmentalsurveyofahospital
AT murakamimasami comparisonof16sribosomalrnagenesequenceanalysisandconventionalcultureintheenvironmentalsurveyofahospital