Cargando…
Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance to complement qualitative analysis of facial expression during deception
BACKGROUND: Accurate evaluation of an individuals' veracity is a fundamental aspect of social functioning that allows individuals to act in adaptive ways. The domain of deception detection ability is still young, and many components in this field are yet to be touched which demands more researc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5248424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28163412 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.196048 |
_version_ | 1782497263703031808 |
---|---|
author | Mondal, Ananya Mukhopadhyay, Pritha Basu, Nabanita Bandyopadhyay, Samir Kumar Chatterjee, Tanima |
author_facet | Mondal, Ananya Mukhopadhyay, Pritha Basu, Nabanita Bandyopadhyay, Samir Kumar Chatterjee, Tanima |
author_sort | Mondal, Ananya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Accurate evaluation of an individuals' veracity is a fundamental aspect of social functioning that allows individuals to act in adaptive ways. The domain of deception detection ability is still young, and many components in this field are yet to be touched which demands more research in this field. AIMS: The present study aims at deciphering the structural composition of face during felt, posed, and deceived emotions in facial expression unique to Indian culture, using Facial Action Coding System (FACS). Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance has been done to complement qualitative FACS analysis. METHODS: In this study, thirty female, young adults with age range of 23–27 years were chosen randomly for portraying their (felt, posed, and deceived) facial expression. All facial expressions were captured through instruction, and videos were converted into static images. The static images were coded on the basis of FACS to decipher the felt, posed, and deceived expressions. Quantitative analysis of the data has been done using MATLAB to meet the objectives of the study and to complement the qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Felt and posed emotions differ in terms of intensity of the expression and subjective experience. Posed emotional and deceived expressions differ in intent. Facial asymmetry is an important indicator for detecting deception. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5248424 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52484242017-02-03 Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance to complement qualitative analysis of facial expression during deception Mondal, Ananya Mukhopadhyay, Pritha Basu, Nabanita Bandyopadhyay, Samir Kumar Chatterjee, Tanima Ind Psychiatry J Original Article BACKGROUND: Accurate evaluation of an individuals' veracity is a fundamental aspect of social functioning that allows individuals to act in adaptive ways. The domain of deception detection ability is still young, and many components in this field are yet to be touched which demands more research in this field. AIMS: The present study aims at deciphering the structural composition of face during felt, posed, and deceived emotions in facial expression unique to Indian culture, using Facial Action Coding System (FACS). Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance has been done to complement qualitative FACS analysis. METHODS: In this study, thirty female, young adults with age range of 23–27 years were chosen randomly for portraying their (felt, posed, and deceived) facial expression. All facial expressions were captured through instruction, and videos were converted into static images. The static images were coded on the basis of FACS to decipher the felt, posed, and deceived expressions. Quantitative analysis of the data has been done using MATLAB to meet the objectives of the study and to complement the qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Felt and posed emotions differ in terms of intensity of the expression and subjective experience. Posed emotional and deceived expressions differ in intent. Facial asymmetry is an important indicator for detecting deception. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5248424/ /pubmed/28163412 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.196048 Text en Copyright: © Industrial Psychiatry Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mondal, Ananya Mukhopadhyay, Pritha Basu, Nabanita Bandyopadhyay, Samir Kumar Chatterjee, Tanima Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance to complement qualitative analysis of facial expression during deception |
title | Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance to complement qualitative analysis of facial expression during deception |
title_full | Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance to complement qualitative analysis of facial expression during deception |
title_fullStr | Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance to complement qualitative analysis of facial expression during deception |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance to complement qualitative analysis of facial expression during deception |
title_short | Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance to complement qualitative analysis of facial expression during deception |
title_sort | quantitative analysis of euclidean distance to complement qualitative analysis of facial expression during deception |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5248424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28163412 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.196048 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mondalananya quantitativeanalysisofeuclideandistancetocomplementqualitativeanalysisoffacialexpressionduringdeception AT mukhopadhyaypritha quantitativeanalysisofeuclideandistancetocomplementqualitativeanalysisoffacialexpressionduringdeception AT basunabanita quantitativeanalysisofeuclideandistancetocomplementqualitativeanalysisoffacialexpressionduringdeception AT bandyopadhyaysamirkumar quantitativeanalysisofeuclideandistancetocomplementqualitativeanalysisoffacialexpressionduringdeception AT chatterjeetanima quantitativeanalysisofeuclideandistancetocomplementqualitativeanalysisoffacialexpressionduringdeception |