Cargando…

Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance to complement qualitative analysis of facial expression during deception

BACKGROUND: Accurate evaluation of an individuals' veracity is a fundamental aspect of social functioning that allows individuals to act in adaptive ways. The domain of deception detection ability is still young, and many components in this field are yet to be touched which demands more researc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mondal, Ananya, Mukhopadhyay, Pritha, Basu, Nabanita, Bandyopadhyay, Samir Kumar, Chatterjee, Tanima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5248424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28163412
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.196048
_version_ 1782497263703031808
author Mondal, Ananya
Mukhopadhyay, Pritha
Basu, Nabanita
Bandyopadhyay, Samir Kumar
Chatterjee, Tanima
author_facet Mondal, Ananya
Mukhopadhyay, Pritha
Basu, Nabanita
Bandyopadhyay, Samir Kumar
Chatterjee, Tanima
author_sort Mondal, Ananya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate evaluation of an individuals' veracity is a fundamental aspect of social functioning that allows individuals to act in adaptive ways. The domain of deception detection ability is still young, and many components in this field are yet to be touched which demands more research in this field. AIMS: The present study aims at deciphering the structural composition of face during felt, posed, and deceived emotions in facial expression unique to Indian culture, using Facial Action Coding System (FACS). Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance has been done to complement qualitative FACS analysis. METHODS: In this study, thirty female, young adults with age range of 23–27 years were chosen randomly for portraying their (felt, posed, and deceived) facial expression. All facial expressions were captured through instruction, and videos were converted into static images. The static images were coded on the basis of FACS to decipher the felt, posed, and deceived expressions. Quantitative analysis of the data has been done using MATLAB to meet the objectives of the study and to complement the qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Felt and posed emotions differ in terms of intensity of the expression and subjective experience. Posed emotional and deceived expressions differ in intent. Facial asymmetry is an important indicator for detecting deception.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5248424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52484242017-02-03 Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance to complement qualitative analysis of facial expression during deception Mondal, Ananya Mukhopadhyay, Pritha Basu, Nabanita Bandyopadhyay, Samir Kumar Chatterjee, Tanima Ind Psychiatry J Original Article BACKGROUND: Accurate evaluation of an individuals' veracity is a fundamental aspect of social functioning that allows individuals to act in adaptive ways. The domain of deception detection ability is still young, and many components in this field are yet to be touched which demands more research in this field. AIMS: The present study aims at deciphering the structural composition of face during felt, posed, and deceived emotions in facial expression unique to Indian culture, using Facial Action Coding System (FACS). Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance has been done to complement qualitative FACS analysis. METHODS: In this study, thirty female, young adults with age range of 23–27 years were chosen randomly for portraying their (felt, posed, and deceived) facial expression. All facial expressions were captured through instruction, and videos were converted into static images. The static images were coded on the basis of FACS to decipher the felt, posed, and deceived expressions. Quantitative analysis of the data has been done using MATLAB to meet the objectives of the study and to complement the qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Felt and posed emotions differ in terms of intensity of the expression and subjective experience. Posed emotional and deceived expressions differ in intent. Facial asymmetry is an important indicator for detecting deception. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5248424/ /pubmed/28163412 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.196048 Text en Copyright: © Industrial Psychiatry Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mondal, Ananya
Mukhopadhyay, Pritha
Basu, Nabanita
Bandyopadhyay, Samir Kumar
Chatterjee, Tanima
Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance to complement qualitative analysis of facial expression during deception
title Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance to complement qualitative analysis of facial expression during deception
title_full Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance to complement qualitative analysis of facial expression during deception
title_fullStr Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance to complement qualitative analysis of facial expression during deception
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance to complement qualitative analysis of facial expression during deception
title_short Quantitative analysis of Euclidean distance to complement qualitative analysis of facial expression during deception
title_sort quantitative analysis of euclidean distance to complement qualitative analysis of facial expression during deception
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5248424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28163412
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.196048
work_keys_str_mv AT mondalananya quantitativeanalysisofeuclideandistancetocomplementqualitativeanalysisoffacialexpressionduringdeception
AT mukhopadhyaypritha quantitativeanalysisofeuclideandistancetocomplementqualitativeanalysisoffacialexpressionduringdeception
AT basunabanita quantitativeanalysisofeuclideandistancetocomplementqualitativeanalysisoffacialexpressionduringdeception
AT bandyopadhyaysamirkumar quantitativeanalysisofeuclideandistancetocomplementqualitativeanalysisoffacialexpressionduringdeception
AT chatterjeetanima quantitativeanalysisofeuclideandistancetocomplementqualitativeanalysisoffacialexpressionduringdeception