Cargando…

Can healthcare utilization data reliably capture cases of chronic respiratory diseases? a cross-sectional investigation in Italy

BACKGROUND: Healthcare utilization data are increasingly used for chronic disease surveillance. Nevertheless, no standard criteria for estimating prevalence of high-impact diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, are available. In this study an algorithm for recogni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biffi, A, Comoretto, R, Arfè, A, Scotti, L, Merlino, L, Vaghi, A, Pesci, A, de Marco, R, Corrao, G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5248488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28103865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-016-0362-6
_version_ 1782497278079008768
author Biffi, A
Comoretto, R
Arfè, A
Scotti, L
Merlino, L
Vaghi, A
Pesci, A
de Marco, R
Corrao, G
author_facet Biffi, A
Comoretto, R
Arfè, A
Scotti, L
Merlino, L
Vaghi, A
Pesci, A
de Marco, R
Corrao, G
author_sort Biffi, A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Healthcare utilization data are increasingly used for chronic disease surveillance. Nevertheless, no standard criteria for estimating prevalence of high-impact diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, are available. In this study an algorithm for recognizing COPD/asthma cases from HCU data is developed and implemented in the HCU databases of the Italian Lombardy Region (about 10 million residents). The impact of diagnostic misclassification for reliably estimating prevalence was also assessed. METHODS: Disease-specificdrug codes, hospital discharges together with co-payment exemptions when available, and a combination of them according with patient’s age, were used to create the proposed algorithm. Identified cases were considered for prevalence estimation. An external validation study was also performed in order to evaluate systematic uncertainty of prevalence estimates. RESULTS: Raw prevalence of COPD and asthma in 2010 was 3.6 and 3.3% respectively. According to external validation, sensitivity values were 53% for COPD and 39% for asthma. Adjusted prevalence estimates were respectively 6.8 and 8.5% for COPD (among person aged 40 years or older) and asthma (among person aged 40 years or younger). CONCLUSIONS: COPD and asthma prevalence may be estimated from HCU data, albeit with high systematic uncertainty. Validation is recommended in this setting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12890-016-0362-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5248488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52484882017-01-25 Can healthcare utilization data reliably capture cases of chronic respiratory diseases? a cross-sectional investigation in Italy Biffi, A Comoretto, R Arfè, A Scotti, L Merlino, L Vaghi, A Pesci, A de Marco, R Corrao, G BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Healthcare utilization data are increasingly used for chronic disease surveillance. Nevertheless, no standard criteria for estimating prevalence of high-impact diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, are available. In this study an algorithm for recognizing COPD/asthma cases from HCU data is developed and implemented in the HCU databases of the Italian Lombardy Region (about 10 million residents). The impact of diagnostic misclassification for reliably estimating prevalence was also assessed. METHODS: Disease-specificdrug codes, hospital discharges together with co-payment exemptions when available, and a combination of them according with patient’s age, were used to create the proposed algorithm. Identified cases were considered for prevalence estimation. An external validation study was also performed in order to evaluate systematic uncertainty of prevalence estimates. RESULTS: Raw prevalence of COPD and asthma in 2010 was 3.6 and 3.3% respectively. According to external validation, sensitivity values were 53% for COPD and 39% for asthma. Adjusted prevalence estimates were respectively 6.8 and 8.5% for COPD (among person aged 40 years or older) and asthma (among person aged 40 years or younger). CONCLUSIONS: COPD and asthma prevalence may be estimated from HCU data, albeit with high systematic uncertainty. Validation is recommended in this setting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12890-016-0362-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5248488/ /pubmed/28103865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-016-0362-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Biffi, A
Comoretto, R
Arfè, A
Scotti, L
Merlino, L
Vaghi, A
Pesci, A
de Marco, R
Corrao, G
Can healthcare utilization data reliably capture cases of chronic respiratory diseases? a cross-sectional investigation in Italy
title Can healthcare utilization data reliably capture cases of chronic respiratory diseases? a cross-sectional investigation in Italy
title_full Can healthcare utilization data reliably capture cases of chronic respiratory diseases? a cross-sectional investigation in Italy
title_fullStr Can healthcare utilization data reliably capture cases of chronic respiratory diseases? a cross-sectional investigation in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Can healthcare utilization data reliably capture cases of chronic respiratory diseases? a cross-sectional investigation in Italy
title_short Can healthcare utilization data reliably capture cases of chronic respiratory diseases? a cross-sectional investigation in Italy
title_sort can healthcare utilization data reliably capture cases of chronic respiratory diseases? a cross-sectional investigation in italy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5248488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28103865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-016-0362-6
work_keys_str_mv AT biffia canhealthcareutilizationdatareliablycapturecasesofchronicrespiratorydiseasesacrosssectionalinvestigationinitaly
AT comorettor canhealthcareutilizationdatareliablycapturecasesofchronicrespiratorydiseasesacrosssectionalinvestigationinitaly
AT arfea canhealthcareutilizationdatareliablycapturecasesofchronicrespiratorydiseasesacrosssectionalinvestigationinitaly
AT scottil canhealthcareutilizationdatareliablycapturecasesofchronicrespiratorydiseasesacrosssectionalinvestigationinitaly
AT merlinol canhealthcareutilizationdatareliablycapturecasesofchronicrespiratorydiseasesacrosssectionalinvestigationinitaly
AT vaghia canhealthcareutilizationdatareliablycapturecasesofchronicrespiratorydiseasesacrosssectionalinvestigationinitaly
AT pescia canhealthcareutilizationdatareliablycapturecasesofchronicrespiratorydiseasesacrosssectionalinvestigationinitaly
AT demarcor canhealthcareutilizationdatareliablycapturecasesofchronicrespiratorydiseasesacrosssectionalinvestigationinitaly
AT corraog canhealthcareutilizationdatareliablycapturecasesofchronicrespiratorydiseasesacrosssectionalinvestigationinitaly
AT canhealthcareutilizationdatareliablycapturecasesofchronicrespiratorydiseasesacrosssectionalinvestigationinitaly