Cargando…

Magnetic field therapy in patients with cytostatics‐induced polyneuropathy: A prospective randomized placebo‐controlled phase‐III study

No causal treatment for chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is known. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a therapy for CIPN. Only scarce clinical data are available concerning magnetic field therapy (MFT) in this context. We conducted a unicentric, randomized, double‐blind,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rick, Oliver, von Hehn, Ulrike, Mikus, Eberhard, Dertinger, Hermann, Geiger, Georg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5248614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bem.22005
_version_ 1782497298035507200
author Rick, Oliver
von Hehn, Ulrike
Mikus, Eberhard
Dertinger, Hermann
Geiger, Georg
author_facet Rick, Oliver
von Hehn, Ulrike
Mikus, Eberhard
Dertinger, Hermann
Geiger, Georg
author_sort Rick, Oliver
collection PubMed
description No causal treatment for chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is known. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a therapy for CIPN. Only scarce clinical data are available concerning magnetic field therapy (MFT) in this context. We conducted a unicentric, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase‐III trial of an MFT device versus placebo. In this study, we randomized 44 patients with CIPN to two treatment groups, where 21 patients were treated with MFT (Group 1) and 23 patients received placebo (Group 2). We evaluated the efficacy of MFT at baseline (T(1)), after 3 weeks of study treatment (T(2)), and after 3 months of study treatment (T(3)). The primary endpoint was nerve conduction velocity (NCV), while secondary endpoints were the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTCAE) score and the Pain Detect End Score at T(3). Seventeen of the patients in Group 1 and 14 patients in Group 2 completed the respective study treatment. The primary endpoint, significant improvement of NCV at T(3), was achieved by MFT (P = 0.015), particularly for sensory neurotoxicity of the peroneal nerve. Also, in respect to the secondary endpoints, significant improvement (P = 0.04) was achieved in terms of the patients’ subjectively perceived neurotoxicity (CTCAE score), but not of neuropathic pain (P = 0.11). From data in the randomized study presented here, a positive effect on the reduction of neurotoxicity can be assumed for the MFT device. Patients with sensory neurotoxicity in the lower limbs, especially, should therefore be offered this therapy. Bioelectromagnetics. 38:85–94, 2017. © 2016 The Authors. Bioelectromagnetics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5248614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52486142017-02-03 Magnetic field therapy in patients with cytostatics‐induced polyneuropathy: A prospective randomized placebo‐controlled phase‐III study Rick, Oliver von Hehn, Ulrike Mikus, Eberhard Dertinger, Hermann Geiger, Georg Bioelectromagnetics Research Articles No causal treatment for chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is known. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a therapy for CIPN. Only scarce clinical data are available concerning magnetic field therapy (MFT) in this context. We conducted a unicentric, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase‐III trial of an MFT device versus placebo. In this study, we randomized 44 patients with CIPN to two treatment groups, where 21 patients were treated with MFT (Group 1) and 23 patients received placebo (Group 2). We evaluated the efficacy of MFT at baseline (T(1)), after 3 weeks of study treatment (T(2)), and after 3 months of study treatment (T(3)). The primary endpoint was nerve conduction velocity (NCV), while secondary endpoints were the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTCAE) score and the Pain Detect End Score at T(3). Seventeen of the patients in Group 1 and 14 patients in Group 2 completed the respective study treatment. The primary endpoint, significant improvement of NCV at T(3), was achieved by MFT (P = 0.015), particularly for sensory neurotoxicity of the peroneal nerve. Also, in respect to the secondary endpoints, significant improvement (P = 0.04) was achieved in terms of the patients’ subjectively perceived neurotoxicity (CTCAE score), but not of neuropathic pain (P = 0.11). From data in the randomized study presented here, a positive effect on the reduction of neurotoxicity can be assumed for the MFT device. Patients with sensory neurotoxicity in the lower limbs, especially, should therefore be offered this therapy. Bioelectromagnetics. 38:85–94, 2017. © 2016 The Authors. Bioelectromagnetics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-22 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5248614/ /pubmed/27657350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bem.22005 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Bioelectromagnetics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Rick, Oliver
von Hehn, Ulrike
Mikus, Eberhard
Dertinger, Hermann
Geiger, Georg
Magnetic field therapy in patients with cytostatics‐induced polyneuropathy: A prospective randomized placebo‐controlled phase‐III study
title Magnetic field therapy in patients with cytostatics‐induced polyneuropathy: A prospective randomized placebo‐controlled phase‐III study
title_full Magnetic field therapy in patients with cytostatics‐induced polyneuropathy: A prospective randomized placebo‐controlled phase‐III study
title_fullStr Magnetic field therapy in patients with cytostatics‐induced polyneuropathy: A prospective randomized placebo‐controlled phase‐III study
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic field therapy in patients with cytostatics‐induced polyneuropathy: A prospective randomized placebo‐controlled phase‐III study
title_short Magnetic field therapy in patients with cytostatics‐induced polyneuropathy: A prospective randomized placebo‐controlled phase‐III study
title_sort magnetic field therapy in patients with cytostatics‐induced polyneuropathy: a prospective randomized placebo‐controlled phase‐iii study
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5248614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bem.22005
work_keys_str_mv AT rickoliver magneticfieldtherapyinpatientswithcytostaticsinducedpolyneuropathyaprospectiverandomizedplacebocontrolledphaseiiistudy
AT vonhehnulrike magneticfieldtherapyinpatientswithcytostaticsinducedpolyneuropathyaprospectiverandomizedplacebocontrolledphaseiiistudy
AT mikuseberhard magneticfieldtherapyinpatientswithcytostaticsinducedpolyneuropathyaprospectiverandomizedplacebocontrolledphaseiiistudy
AT dertingerhermann magneticfieldtherapyinpatientswithcytostaticsinducedpolyneuropathyaprospectiverandomizedplacebocontrolledphaseiiistudy
AT geigergeorg magneticfieldtherapyinpatientswithcytostaticsinducedpolyneuropathyaprospectiverandomizedplacebocontrolledphaseiiistudy