Cargando…

Epidemiological and Clinical Features of Brucellosis in the Country of Georgia

BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is an endemic disease in the country of Georgia. According to the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health of Georgia (NCDC), the average annual number of brucellosis cases was 161 during 2008–2012. However, the true number of cases is thought to be higher due to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akhvlediani, Tamar, Bautista, Christian T., Garuchava, Natalia, Sanodze, Lia, Kokaia, Nora, Malania, Lile, Chitadze, Nazibrola, Sidamonidze, Ketevan, Rivard, Robert G., Hepburn, Matthew J., Nikolich, Mikeljon P., Imnadze, Paata, Trapaidze, Nino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5249056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28107444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170376
_version_ 1782497381494816768
author Akhvlediani, Tamar
Bautista, Christian T.
Garuchava, Natalia
Sanodze, Lia
Kokaia, Nora
Malania, Lile
Chitadze, Nazibrola
Sidamonidze, Ketevan
Rivard, Robert G.
Hepburn, Matthew J.
Nikolich, Mikeljon P.
Imnadze, Paata
Trapaidze, Nino
author_facet Akhvlediani, Tamar
Bautista, Christian T.
Garuchava, Natalia
Sanodze, Lia
Kokaia, Nora
Malania, Lile
Chitadze, Nazibrola
Sidamonidze, Ketevan
Rivard, Robert G.
Hepburn, Matthew J.
Nikolich, Mikeljon P.
Imnadze, Paata
Trapaidze, Nino
author_sort Akhvlediani, Tamar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is an endemic disease in the country of Georgia. According to the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health of Georgia (NCDC), the average annual number of brucellosis cases was 161 during 2008–2012. However, the true number of cases is thought to be higher due to underreporting. The aim of this study was to provide current epidemiological and clinical information and evaluate diagnostic methods used for brucellosis in Georgia. METHODOLOGY: Adult patients were eligible for participation if they met the suspected or probable case definition for brucellosis. After consent participants were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire to collect information on socio-demographic characteristics, epidemiology, history of present illness, and clinical manifestation. For the diagnosis of brucellosis, culture and serological tests were used. RESULTS: A total of 81 participants were enrolled, of which 70 (86%) were from rural areas. Seventy-four percent of participants reported consuming unpasteurized milk products and 62% consuming undercooked meat products before symptom onset. Forty-one participants were positive by the Wright test and 33 (41%) were positive by blood culture. There was perfect agreement between the Huddelston and Wright tests (k = 1.0). Compared with blood culture (the diagnostic gold standard), ELISA IgG and total ELISA (IgG + IgM), the Wright test had fair (k = 0.12), fair (k = 0.24), and moderate (k = 0.52) agreement, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of unpasteurized milk products and undercooked meat were among the most common risk factors in brucellosis cases. We found poor agreement between ELISA tests and culture results. This report also serves as an initial indication that the suspected case definition for brucellosis surveillance purposes needs revision. Further research is needed to characterize the epidemiology and evaluate the performance of the diagnostic methods for brucellosis in Georgia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5249056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52490562017-02-06 Epidemiological and Clinical Features of Brucellosis in the Country of Georgia Akhvlediani, Tamar Bautista, Christian T. Garuchava, Natalia Sanodze, Lia Kokaia, Nora Malania, Lile Chitadze, Nazibrola Sidamonidze, Ketevan Rivard, Robert G. Hepburn, Matthew J. Nikolich, Mikeljon P. Imnadze, Paata Trapaidze, Nino PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is an endemic disease in the country of Georgia. According to the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health of Georgia (NCDC), the average annual number of brucellosis cases was 161 during 2008–2012. However, the true number of cases is thought to be higher due to underreporting. The aim of this study was to provide current epidemiological and clinical information and evaluate diagnostic methods used for brucellosis in Georgia. METHODOLOGY: Adult patients were eligible for participation if they met the suspected or probable case definition for brucellosis. After consent participants were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire to collect information on socio-demographic characteristics, epidemiology, history of present illness, and clinical manifestation. For the diagnosis of brucellosis, culture and serological tests were used. RESULTS: A total of 81 participants were enrolled, of which 70 (86%) were from rural areas. Seventy-four percent of participants reported consuming unpasteurized milk products and 62% consuming undercooked meat products before symptom onset. Forty-one participants were positive by the Wright test and 33 (41%) were positive by blood culture. There was perfect agreement between the Huddelston and Wright tests (k = 1.0). Compared with blood culture (the diagnostic gold standard), ELISA IgG and total ELISA (IgG + IgM), the Wright test had fair (k = 0.12), fair (k = 0.24), and moderate (k = 0.52) agreement, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of unpasteurized milk products and undercooked meat were among the most common risk factors in brucellosis cases. We found poor agreement between ELISA tests and culture results. This report also serves as an initial indication that the suspected case definition for brucellosis surveillance purposes needs revision. Further research is needed to characterize the epidemiology and evaluate the performance of the diagnostic methods for brucellosis in Georgia. Public Library of Science 2017-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5249056/ /pubmed/28107444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170376 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Akhvlediani, Tamar
Bautista, Christian T.
Garuchava, Natalia
Sanodze, Lia
Kokaia, Nora
Malania, Lile
Chitadze, Nazibrola
Sidamonidze, Ketevan
Rivard, Robert G.
Hepburn, Matthew J.
Nikolich, Mikeljon P.
Imnadze, Paata
Trapaidze, Nino
Epidemiological and Clinical Features of Brucellosis in the Country of Georgia
title Epidemiological and Clinical Features of Brucellosis in the Country of Georgia
title_full Epidemiological and Clinical Features of Brucellosis in the Country of Georgia
title_fullStr Epidemiological and Clinical Features of Brucellosis in the Country of Georgia
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiological and Clinical Features of Brucellosis in the Country of Georgia
title_short Epidemiological and Clinical Features of Brucellosis in the Country of Georgia
title_sort epidemiological and clinical features of brucellosis in the country of georgia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5249056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28107444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170376
work_keys_str_mv AT akhvledianitamar epidemiologicalandclinicalfeaturesofbrucellosisinthecountryofgeorgia
AT bautistachristiant epidemiologicalandclinicalfeaturesofbrucellosisinthecountryofgeorgia
AT garuchavanatalia epidemiologicalandclinicalfeaturesofbrucellosisinthecountryofgeorgia
AT sanodzelia epidemiologicalandclinicalfeaturesofbrucellosisinthecountryofgeorgia
AT kokaianora epidemiologicalandclinicalfeaturesofbrucellosisinthecountryofgeorgia
AT malanialile epidemiologicalandclinicalfeaturesofbrucellosisinthecountryofgeorgia
AT chitadzenazibrola epidemiologicalandclinicalfeaturesofbrucellosisinthecountryofgeorgia
AT sidamonidzeketevan epidemiologicalandclinicalfeaturesofbrucellosisinthecountryofgeorgia
AT rivardrobertg epidemiologicalandclinicalfeaturesofbrucellosisinthecountryofgeorgia
AT hepburnmatthewj epidemiologicalandclinicalfeaturesofbrucellosisinthecountryofgeorgia
AT nikolichmikeljonp epidemiologicalandclinicalfeaturesofbrucellosisinthecountryofgeorgia
AT imnadzepaata epidemiologicalandclinicalfeaturesofbrucellosisinthecountryofgeorgia
AT trapaidzenino epidemiologicalandclinicalfeaturesofbrucellosisinthecountryofgeorgia