Cargando…

Using Breast Cancer Risk Associated Polymorphisms to Identify Women for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer can be prevented with selective estrogen receptor modifiers (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs). The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends that women with a 5-year breast cancer risk ≥3% consider chemoprevention for breast cancer. More than 70 single nucleotide po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ziv, Elad, Tice, Jeffrey A., Sprague, Brian, Vachon, Celine M., Cummings, Steven R., Kerlikowske, Karla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5249071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28107349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168601
_version_ 1782497384854454272
author Ziv, Elad
Tice, Jeffrey A.
Sprague, Brian
Vachon, Celine M.
Cummings, Steven R.
Kerlikowske, Karla
author_facet Ziv, Elad
Tice, Jeffrey A.
Sprague, Brian
Vachon, Celine M.
Cummings, Steven R.
Kerlikowske, Karla
author_sort Ziv, Elad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breast cancer can be prevented with selective estrogen receptor modifiers (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs). The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends that women with a 5-year breast cancer risk ≥3% consider chemoprevention for breast cancer. More than 70 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been associated with breast cancer. We sought to determine how to best integrate risk information from SNPs with other risk factors to risk stratify women for chemoprevention. METHODS: We used the risk distribution among women ages 35–69 estimated by the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) risk model. We modeled the effect of adding 70 SNPs to the BCSC model and examined how this would affect how many women are reclassified above and below the threshold for chemoprevention. RESULTS: We found that most of the benefit of SNP testing a population is achieved by testing a modest fraction of the population. For example, if women with a 5-year BCSC risk of >2.0% are tested (~21% of all women), ~75% of the benefit of testing all women (shifting women above or below 3% 5-year risk) would be derived. If women with a 5-year risk of >1.5% are tested (~36% of all women), ~90% of the benefit of testing all women would be derived. CONCLUSION: SNP testing is effective for reclassification of women for chemoprevention, but is unlikely to reclassify women with <1.5% 5-year risk. These results can be used to implement an efficient two-step testing approach to identify high risk women who may benefit from chemoprevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5249071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52490712017-02-06 Using Breast Cancer Risk Associated Polymorphisms to Identify Women for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention Ziv, Elad Tice, Jeffrey A. Sprague, Brian Vachon, Celine M. Cummings, Steven R. Kerlikowske, Karla PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Breast cancer can be prevented with selective estrogen receptor modifiers (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs). The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends that women with a 5-year breast cancer risk ≥3% consider chemoprevention for breast cancer. More than 70 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been associated with breast cancer. We sought to determine how to best integrate risk information from SNPs with other risk factors to risk stratify women for chemoprevention. METHODS: We used the risk distribution among women ages 35–69 estimated by the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) risk model. We modeled the effect of adding 70 SNPs to the BCSC model and examined how this would affect how many women are reclassified above and below the threshold for chemoprevention. RESULTS: We found that most of the benefit of SNP testing a population is achieved by testing a modest fraction of the population. For example, if women with a 5-year BCSC risk of >2.0% are tested (~21% of all women), ~75% of the benefit of testing all women (shifting women above or below 3% 5-year risk) would be derived. If women with a 5-year risk of >1.5% are tested (~36% of all women), ~90% of the benefit of testing all women would be derived. CONCLUSION: SNP testing is effective for reclassification of women for chemoprevention, but is unlikely to reclassify women with <1.5% 5-year risk. These results can be used to implement an efficient two-step testing approach to identify high risk women who may benefit from chemoprevention. Public Library of Science 2017-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5249071/ /pubmed/28107349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168601 Text en © 2017 Ziv et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ziv, Elad
Tice, Jeffrey A.
Sprague, Brian
Vachon, Celine M.
Cummings, Steven R.
Kerlikowske, Karla
Using Breast Cancer Risk Associated Polymorphisms to Identify Women for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention
title Using Breast Cancer Risk Associated Polymorphisms to Identify Women for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention
title_full Using Breast Cancer Risk Associated Polymorphisms to Identify Women for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention
title_fullStr Using Breast Cancer Risk Associated Polymorphisms to Identify Women for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention
title_full_unstemmed Using Breast Cancer Risk Associated Polymorphisms to Identify Women for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention
title_short Using Breast Cancer Risk Associated Polymorphisms to Identify Women for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention
title_sort using breast cancer risk associated polymorphisms to identify women for breast cancer chemoprevention
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5249071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28107349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168601
work_keys_str_mv AT zivelad usingbreastcancerriskassociatedpolymorphismstoidentifywomenforbreastcancerchemoprevention
AT ticejeffreya usingbreastcancerriskassociatedpolymorphismstoidentifywomenforbreastcancerchemoprevention
AT spraguebrian usingbreastcancerriskassociatedpolymorphismstoidentifywomenforbreastcancerchemoprevention
AT vachoncelinem usingbreastcancerriskassociatedpolymorphismstoidentifywomenforbreastcancerchemoprevention
AT cummingsstevenr usingbreastcancerriskassociatedpolymorphismstoidentifywomenforbreastcancerchemoprevention
AT kerlikowskekarla usingbreastcancerriskassociatedpolymorphismstoidentifywomenforbreastcancerchemoprevention