Cargando…

Staged versus One-Time Complete Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION: In patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the preferred intervention is percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Whether staged PCI (S-PCI) or one-time complete PCI (MV-PCI) is more beneficial and safer in terms of treating the non-culprit vessel during the pri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zhenwei, Zhou, Yijiang, Xu, Qingqing, Chen, Xiaomin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5249143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28107455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169406
_version_ 1782497401043419136
author Li, Zhenwei
Zhou, Yijiang
Xu, Qingqing
Chen, Xiaomin
author_facet Li, Zhenwei
Zhou, Yijiang
Xu, Qingqing
Chen, Xiaomin
author_sort Li, Zhenwei
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the preferred intervention is percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Whether staged PCI (S-PCI) or one-time complete PCI (MV-PCI) is more beneficial and safer in terms of treating the non-culprit vessel during the primary PCI procedure is unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of all randomized and non-randomized controlled trials comparing S-PCI with MV-PCI in patients with acute STEMI and MVD. METHODS: Studies of STEMI with multivessel disease receiving primary PCI were searched in PUBMED, EMBASE and The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials from January 2004 to December 2014. The primary end points were long-term rates of major adverse cardiovascular events and their components—mortality, reinfarction, and target-vessel revascularization. Data were combined using a fixed-effects model. RESULTS: Of 507 citations, 10 studies (4 randomized, 6 nonrandomized; 820 patients, 562 staged PCI and 347 one-time, complete multi-vessel PCI) were included. S-PCI compared to MV-PCI significantly reduced mortality both long-term (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29–0.66, P<0.0001, I(2) = 0%) and short-term (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.1–0.51, P = 0.0003, I(2) = 0%). There was a trend toward reduced risk of MACE with s-PCI compared with MV-PCI (OR 0.83, 0.62–1.12, P = 0.22, I2 = 0%). No difference between S-PCI and MV-PCI was observed in reinfarction (OR 0.97, 0.61–1.55, P = 0.91, I(2) = 0%), or target vessel revascularization (OR1.17, 95% CI 0.81–1.69, P = 0.40, I(2) = 8%). CONCLUSIONS: The staged strategy for non-culprit lesions improved short- and long-term survival and should remain the standard approach to primary PCI in patients with STEMI; one-time complete multivessel PCI may be associated with greater mortality risk. However, additional large, randomized trials are required to confirm the optimal timing of a staged procedure on the non-culprit vessel in STEMI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5249143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52491432017-02-06 Staged versus One-Time Complete Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Li, Zhenwei Zhou, Yijiang Xu, Qingqing Chen, Xiaomin PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: In patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the preferred intervention is percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Whether staged PCI (S-PCI) or one-time complete PCI (MV-PCI) is more beneficial and safer in terms of treating the non-culprit vessel during the primary PCI procedure is unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of all randomized and non-randomized controlled trials comparing S-PCI with MV-PCI in patients with acute STEMI and MVD. METHODS: Studies of STEMI with multivessel disease receiving primary PCI were searched in PUBMED, EMBASE and The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials from January 2004 to December 2014. The primary end points were long-term rates of major adverse cardiovascular events and their components—mortality, reinfarction, and target-vessel revascularization. Data were combined using a fixed-effects model. RESULTS: Of 507 citations, 10 studies (4 randomized, 6 nonrandomized; 820 patients, 562 staged PCI and 347 one-time, complete multi-vessel PCI) were included. S-PCI compared to MV-PCI significantly reduced mortality both long-term (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29–0.66, P<0.0001, I(2) = 0%) and short-term (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.1–0.51, P = 0.0003, I(2) = 0%). There was a trend toward reduced risk of MACE with s-PCI compared with MV-PCI (OR 0.83, 0.62–1.12, P = 0.22, I2 = 0%). No difference between S-PCI and MV-PCI was observed in reinfarction (OR 0.97, 0.61–1.55, P = 0.91, I(2) = 0%), or target vessel revascularization (OR1.17, 95% CI 0.81–1.69, P = 0.40, I(2) = 8%). CONCLUSIONS: The staged strategy for non-culprit lesions improved short- and long-term survival and should remain the standard approach to primary PCI in patients with STEMI; one-time complete multivessel PCI may be associated with greater mortality risk. However, additional large, randomized trials are required to confirm the optimal timing of a staged procedure on the non-culprit vessel in STEMI. Public Library of Science 2017-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5249143/ /pubmed/28107455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169406 Text en © 2017 Li et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Zhenwei
Zhou, Yijiang
Xu, Qingqing
Chen, Xiaomin
Staged versus One-Time Complete Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Staged versus One-Time Complete Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Staged versus One-Time Complete Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Staged versus One-Time Complete Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Staged versus One-Time Complete Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Staged versus One-Time Complete Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort staged versus one-time complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention in stemi patients with multivessel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5249143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28107455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169406
work_keys_str_mv AT lizhenwei stagedversusonetimecompleterevascularizationwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstemipatientswithmultivesseldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhouyijiang stagedversusonetimecompleterevascularizationwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstemipatientswithmultivesseldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuqingqing stagedversusonetimecompleterevascularizationwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstemipatientswithmultivesseldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenxiaomin stagedversusonetimecompleterevascularizationwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstemipatientswithmultivesseldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis