Cargando…
Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Through the Left Radial Artery is Associated with Less Vascular Complications than Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Through the Femoral Artery
OBJECTIVE: To compare the advantages and disadvantages of emergency percutaneous coronary intervention through the left radial artery with those of emergency percutaneous coronary intervention through the femoral artery. METHODS: A total of 206 patients with acute myocardial infarction who required...
Autores principales: | Qi, Guoqing, Sun, Qi, Xia, Yue, Wei, Liye |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5251197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28226025 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(01)01 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Occupational radiation exposure in femoral artery approach is higher than radial artery approach during coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention
por: Kim, Jung-Su, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
por: Ferrante, Arnaud, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Left Distal Radial Artery Access Site in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Is It Safe?
por: Soydan, Elton, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass grafting in emergency and non-emergency unprotected left-main revascularization
por: Daoulah, Amin, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Radial artery occlusion after percutaneous coronary interventions – an underestimated issue
por: Sławin, Janusz, et al.
Publicado: (2013)