Cargando…

Stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial designs: a review of reporting quality and design features

BACKGROUND: The stepped wedge (SW) cluster randomized controlled trial (CRCT) design is being used with increasing frequency. However, there is limited published research on the quality of reporting of SW-CRCTs. We address this issue by conducting a literature review. METHODS: Medline, Ovid, Web of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grayling, Michael J., Wason, James M. S., Mander, Adrian P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5251280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28109321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1783-0
_version_ 1782497784684871680
author Grayling, Michael J.
Wason, James M. S.
Mander, Adrian P.
author_facet Grayling, Michael J.
Wason, James M. S.
Mander, Adrian P.
author_sort Grayling, Michael J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The stepped wedge (SW) cluster randomized controlled trial (CRCT) design is being used with increasing frequency. However, there is limited published research on the quality of reporting of SW-CRCTs. We address this issue by conducting a literature review. METHODS: Medline, Ovid, Web of Knowledge, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, the ISRCTN registry, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to identify investigations employing the SW-CRCT design up to February 2015. For each included completed study, information was extracted on a selection of criteria, based on the CONSORT extension to CRCTs, to assess the quality of reporting. RESULTS: A total of 123 studies were included in our review, of which 39 were completed trial reports. The standard of reporting of SW-CRCTs varied in quality. The percentage of trials reporting each criterion varied to as low as 15.4%, with a median of 66.7%. CONCLUSIONS: There is much room for improvement in the quality of reporting of SW-CRCTs. This is consistent with recent findings for CRCTs. A CONSORT extension for SW-CRCTs is warranted to standardize the reporting of SW-CRCTs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1783-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5251280
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52512802017-01-26 Stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial designs: a review of reporting quality and design features Grayling, Michael J. Wason, James M. S. Mander, Adrian P. Trials Review BACKGROUND: The stepped wedge (SW) cluster randomized controlled trial (CRCT) design is being used with increasing frequency. However, there is limited published research on the quality of reporting of SW-CRCTs. We address this issue by conducting a literature review. METHODS: Medline, Ovid, Web of Knowledge, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, the ISRCTN registry, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to identify investigations employing the SW-CRCT design up to February 2015. For each included completed study, information was extracted on a selection of criteria, based on the CONSORT extension to CRCTs, to assess the quality of reporting. RESULTS: A total of 123 studies were included in our review, of which 39 were completed trial reports. The standard of reporting of SW-CRCTs varied in quality. The percentage of trials reporting each criterion varied to as low as 15.4%, with a median of 66.7%. CONCLUSIONS: There is much room for improvement in the quality of reporting of SW-CRCTs. This is consistent with recent findings for CRCTs. A CONSORT extension for SW-CRCTs is warranted to standardize the reporting of SW-CRCTs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1783-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5251280/ /pubmed/28109321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1783-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Grayling, Michael J.
Wason, James M. S.
Mander, Adrian P.
Stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial designs: a review of reporting quality and design features
title Stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial designs: a review of reporting quality and design features
title_full Stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial designs: a review of reporting quality and design features
title_fullStr Stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial designs: a review of reporting quality and design features
title_full_unstemmed Stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial designs: a review of reporting quality and design features
title_short Stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial designs: a review of reporting quality and design features
title_sort stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial designs: a review of reporting quality and design features
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5251280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28109321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1783-0
work_keys_str_mv AT graylingmichaelj steppedwedgeclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignsareviewofreportingqualityanddesignfeatures
AT wasonjamesms steppedwedgeclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignsareviewofreportingqualityanddesignfeatures
AT manderadrianp steppedwedgeclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignsareviewofreportingqualityanddesignfeatures