Cargando…
Adjusting Overall Survival Estimates after Treatment Switching: a Case Study in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
BACKGROUND: If patients in oncology trials receive subsequent therapy, standard intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses may inaccurately estimate the overall survival (OS) effect of the investigational product. In this context, a post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 PREVAIL study was performed with the aim to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27981431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11523-016-0472-3 |
_version_ | 1782498125408108544 |
---|---|
author | Skaltsa, Konstantina Ivanescu, Cristina Naidoo, Shevani Phung, De Holmstrom, Stefan Latimer, Nicholas R. |
author_facet | Skaltsa, Konstantina Ivanescu, Cristina Naidoo, Shevani Phung, De Holmstrom, Stefan Latimer, Nicholas R. |
author_sort | Skaltsa, Konstantina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: If patients in oncology trials receive subsequent therapy, standard intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses may inaccurately estimate the overall survival (OS) effect of the investigational product. In this context, a post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 PREVAIL study was performed with the aim to compare enzalutamide with placebo in terms of OS, adjusting for potential confounding from switching to antineoplastic therapies that are not part of standard metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treatment pathways in some jurisdictions. METHODS: The PREVAIL study, which included 1717 chemotherapy-naïve men with mCRPC randomized to treatment with enzalutamide 160 mg/day or placebo, was stopped after a planned interim survival analysis revealed a benefit in favor of enzalutamide. Data from this cutoff point were confounded by switching from both arms and so were evaluated in terms of OS using two switching adjustment methods: the two-stage accelerated failure time model (two-stage method) and inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW). RESULTS: Following adjustment for switching to nonstandard antineoplastic therapies by 14.8 (129/872 patients) and 21.3% (180/845 patients) of patients initially randomized to enzalutamide and placebo, respectively, the two-stage and IPCW methods both resulted in numerical reductions in the hazard ratio (HR) for OS [HR 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57–0.81 and HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52–0.75, respectively] for enzalutamide compared to placebo versus the unadjusted ITT analysis (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60–0.84). These results suggest a slightly greater effect of enzalutamide on OS than originally reported. CONCLUSION: In the PREVAIL study, switching to nonstandard antineoplastic mCRPC therapies resulted in the ITT analysis of primary data underestimating the benefit of enzalutamide on OS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11523-016-0472-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5253154 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52531542017-02-03 Adjusting Overall Survival Estimates after Treatment Switching: a Case Study in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Skaltsa, Konstantina Ivanescu, Cristina Naidoo, Shevani Phung, De Holmstrom, Stefan Latimer, Nicholas R. Target Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND: If patients in oncology trials receive subsequent therapy, standard intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses may inaccurately estimate the overall survival (OS) effect of the investigational product. In this context, a post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 PREVAIL study was performed with the aim to compare enzalutamide with placebo in terms of OS, adjusting for potential confounding from switching to antineoplastic therapies that are not part of standard metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treatment pathways in some jurisdictions. METHODS: The PREVAIL study, which included 1717 chemotherapy-naïve men with mCRPC randomized to treatment with enzalutamide 160 mg/day or placebo, was stopped after a planned interim survival analysis revealed a benefit in favor of enzalutamide. Data from this cutoff point were confounded by switching from both arms and so were evaluated in terms of OS using two switching adjustment methods: the two-stage accelerated failure time model (two-stage method) and inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW). RESULTS: Following adjustment for switching to nonstandard antineoplastic therapies by 14.8 (129/872 patients) and 21.3% (180/845 patients) of patients initially randomized to enzalutamide and placebo, respectively, the two-stage and IPCW methods both resulted in numerical reductions in the hazard ratio (HR) for OS [HR 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57–0.81 and HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52–0.75, respectively] for enzalutamide compared to placebo versus the unadjusted ITT analysis (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60–0.84). These results suggest a slightly greater effect of enzalutamide on OS than originally reported. CONCLUSION: In the PREVAIL study, switching to nonstandard antineoplastic mCRPC therapies resulted in the ITT analysis of primary data underestimating the benefit of enzalutamide on OS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11523-016-0472-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-12-15 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5253154/ /pubmed/27981431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11523-016-0472-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Skaltsa, Konstantina Ivanescu, Cristina Naidoo, Shevani Phung, De Holmstrom, Stefan Latimer, Nicholas R. Adjusting Overall Survival Estimates after Treatment Switching: a Case Study in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer |
title | Adjusting Overall Survival Estimates after Treatment Switching: a Case Study in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer |
title_full | Adjusting Overall Survival Estimates after Treatment Switching: a Case Study in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer |
title_fullStr | Adjusting Overall Survival Estimates after Treatment Switching: a Case Study in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Adjusting Overall Survival Estimates after Treatment Switching: a Case Study in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer |
title_short | Adjusting Overall Survival Estimates after Treatment Switching: a Case Study in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer |
title_sort | adjusting overall survival estimates after treatment switching: a case study in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27981431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11523-016-0472-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT skaltsakonstantina adjustingoverallsurvivalestimatesaftertreatmentswitchingacasestudyinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer AT ivanescucristina adjustingoverallsurvivalestimatesaftertreatmentswitchingacasestudyinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer AT naidooshevani adjustingoverallsurvivalestimatesaftertreatmentswitchingacasestudyinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer AT phungde adjustingoverallsurvivalestimatesaftertreatmentswitchingacasestudyinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer AT holmstromstefan adjustingoverallsurvivalestimatesaftertreatmentswitchingacasestudyinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer AT latimernicholasr adjustingoverallsurvivalestimatesaftertreatmentswitchingacasestudyinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer |