Cargando…

Adjusting Overall Survival Estimates after Treatment Switching: a Case Study in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND: If patients in oncology trials receive subsequent therapy, standard intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses may inaccurately estimate the overall survival (OS) effect of the investigational product. In this context, a post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 PREVAIL study was performed with the aim to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skaltsa, Konstantina, Ivanescu, Cristina, Naidoo, Shevani, Phung, De, Holmstrom, Stefan, Latimer, Nicholas R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27981431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11523-016-0472-3
_version_ 1782498125408108544
author Skaltsa, Konstantina
Ivanescu, Cristina
Naidoo, Shevani
Phung, De
Holmstrom, Stefan
Latimer, Nicholas R.
author_facet Skaltsa, Konstantina
Ivanescu, Cristina
Naidoo, Shevani
Phung, De
Holmstrom, Stefan
Latimer, Nicholas R.
author_sort Skaltsa, Konstantina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: If patients in oncology trials receive subsequent therapy, standard intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses may inaccurately estimate the overall survival (OS) effect of the investigational product. In this context, a post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 PREVAIL study was performed with the aim to compare enzalutamide with placebo in terms of OS, adjusting for potential confounding from switching to antineoplastic therapies that are not part of standard metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treatment pathways in some jurisdictions. METHODS: The PREVAIL study, which included 1717 chemotherapy-naïve men with mCRPC randomized to treatment with enzalutamide 160 mg/day or placebo, was stopped after a planned interim survival analysis revealed a benefit in favor of enzalutamide. Data from this cutoff point were confounded by switching from both arms and so were evaluated in terms of OS using two switching adjustment methods: the two-stage accelerated failure time model (two-stage method) and inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW). RESULTS: Following adjustment for switching to nonstandard antineoplastic therapies by 14.8 (129/872 patients) and 21.3% (180/845 patients) of patients initially randomized to enzalutamide and placebo, respectively, the two-stage and IPCW methods both resulted in numerical reductions in the hazard ratio (HR) for OS [HR 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57–0.81 and HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52–0.75, respectively] for enzalutamide compared to placebo versus the unadjusted ITT analysis (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60–0.84). These results suggest a slightly greater effect of enzalutamide on OS than originally reported. CONCLUSION: In the PREVAIL study, switching to nonstandard antineoplastic mCRPC therapies resulted in the ITT analysis of primary data underestimating the benefit of enzalutamide on OS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11523-016-0472-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5253154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52531542017-02-03 Adjusting Overall Survival Estimates after Treatment Switching: a Case Study in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Skaltsa, Konstantina Ivanescu, Cristina Naidoo, Shevani Phung, De Holmstrom, Stefan Latimer, Nicholas R. Target Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND: If patients in oncology trials receive subsequent therapy, standard intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses may inaccurately estimate the overall survival (OS) effect of the investigational product. In this context, a post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 PREVAIL study was performed with the aim to compare enzalutamide with placebo in terms of OS, adjusting for potential confounding from switching to antineoplastic therapies that are not part of standard metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treatment pathways in some jurisdictions. METHODS: The PREVAIL study, which included 1717 chemotherapy-naïve men with mCRPC randomized to treatment with enzalutamide 160 mg/day or placebo, was stopped after a planned interim survival analysis revealed a benefit in favor of enzalutamide. Data from this cutoff point were confounded by switching from both arms and so were evaluated in terms of OS using two switching adjustment methods: the two-stage accelerated failure time model (two-stage method) and inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW). RESULTS: Following adjustment for switching to nonstandard antineoplastic therapies by 14.8 (129/872 patients) and 21.3% (180/845 patients) of patients initially randomized to enzalutamide and placebo, respectively, the two-stage and IPCW methods both resulted in numerical reductions in the hazard ratio (HR) for OS [HR 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57–0.81 and HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52–0.75, respectively] for enzalutamide compared to placebo versus the unadjusted ITT analysis (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60–0.84). These results suggest a slightly greater effect of enzalutamide on OS than originally reported. CONCLUSION: In the PREVAIL study, switching to nonstandard antineoplastic mCRPC therapies resulted in the ITT analysis of primary data underestimating the benefit of enzalutamide on OS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11523-016-0472-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-12-15 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5253154/ /pubmed/27981431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11523-016-0472-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Skaltsa, Konstantina
Ivanescu, Cristina
Naidoo, Shevani
Phung, De
Holmstrom, Stefan
Latimer, Nicholas R.
Adjusting Overall Survival Estimates after Treatment Switching: a Case Study in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
title Adjusting Overall Survival Estimates after Treatment Switching: a Case Study in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
title_full Adjusting Overall Survival Estimates after Treatment Switching: a Case Study in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Adjusting Overall Survival Estimates after Treatment Switching: a Case Study in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Adjusting Overall Survival Estimates after Treatment Switching: a Case Study in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
title_short Adjusting Overall Survival Estimates after Treatment Switching: a Case Study in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
title_sort adjusting overall survival estimates after treatment switching: a case study in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27981431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11523-016-0472-3
work_keys_str_mv AT skaltsakonstantina adjustingoverallsurvivalestimatesaftertreatmentswitchingacasestudyinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT ivanescucristina adjustingoverallsurvivalestimatesaftertreatmentswitchingacasestudyinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT naidooshevani adjustingoverallsurvivalestimatesaftertreatmentswitchingacasestudyinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT phungde adjustingoverallsurvivalestimatesaftertreatmentswitchingacasestudyinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT holmstromstefan adjustingoverallsurvivalestimatesaftertreatmentswitchingacasestudyinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT latimernicholasr adjustingoverallsurvivalestimatesaftertreatmentswitchingacasestudyinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer