Cargando…

Economic Evaluation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Model Frameworks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND: Several treatments are on the horizon for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a terminal orphan disease. In many jurisdictions, decisions regarding pricing and reimbursement of these health technologies comprise evidence of value for money. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Landfeldt, Erik, Alfredsson, Lars, Straub, Volker, Lochmüller, Hanns, Bushby, Katharine, Lindgren, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27798808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0461-5
_version_ 1782498126129528832
author Landfeldt, Erik
Alfredsson, Lars
Straub, Volker
Lochmüller, Hanns
Bushby, Katharine
Lindgren, Peter
author_facet Landfeldt, Erik
Alfredsson, Lars
Straub, Volker
Lochmüller, Hanns
Bushby, Katharine
Lindgren, Peter
author_sort Landfeldt, Erik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several treatments are on the horizon for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a terminal orphan disease. In many jurisdictions, decisions regarding pricing and reimbursement of these health technologies comprise evidence of value for money. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a cost-effectiveness model based on the Duchenne muscular dystrophy Functional Ability Self-Assessment Tool (DMDSAT), a new rating scale created specifically to measure disease progression in clinical practice and trials and model DMD in economic evaluations, and compare it with two alternative model structures. METHODS: We constructed three Markov cohort state-transition models to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a hypothetical intervention for DMD versus standard of care in a UK setting. Model I was based on the DMDSAT, model II on stages of disease as defined in the DMD clinical care guidelines and model III on patients’ ventilation status. The conceptual model structures were formulated in collaboration with three DMD experts. RESULTS: All three models were judged to have good validity with regards to the appropriateness of the choice of modelling technique, conceptual representation of the disease, model input data and model outcomes. Across frameworks, lifetime direct medical costs with standard of care ranged between £217,510 and £284,640, total costs between £624,240 and £713,840, and total number of quality-adjusted life-years between 5.96 and 7.17. CONCLUSIONS: We present a first version of a model for the economic evaluation of treatments for DMD based on the DMDSAT, as well as two alternative frameworks encompassing conventional staging of disease progression. Our findings should be helpful to inform health technology assessments and health economic programmes of future treatments for DMD. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0461-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5253157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52531572017-02-03 Economic Evaluation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Model Frameworks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Landfeldt, Erik Alfredsson, Lars Straub, Volker Lochmüller, Hanns Bushby, Katharine Lindgren, Peter Pharmacoeconomics Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Several treatments are on the horizon for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a terminal orphan disease. In many jurisdictions, decisions regarding pricing and reimbursement of these health technologies comprise evidence of value for money. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a cost-effectiveness model based on the Duchenne muscular dystrophy Functional Ability Self-Assessment Tool (DMDSAT), a new rating scale created specifically to measure disease progression in clinical practice and trials and model DMD in economic evaluations, and compare it with two alternative model structures. METHODS: We constructed three Markov cohort state-transition models to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a hypothetical intervention for DMD versus standard of care in a UK setting. Model I was based on the DMDSAT, model II on stages of disease as defined in the DMD clinical care guidelines and model III on patients’ ventilation status. The conceptual model structures were formulated in collaboration with three DMD experts. RESULTS: All three models were judged to have good validity with regards to the appropriateness of the choice of modelling technique, conceptual representation of the disease, model input data and model outcomes. Across frameworks, lifetime direct medical costs with standard of care ranged between £217,510 and £284,640, total costs between £624,240 and £713,840, and total number of quality-adjusted life-years between 5.96 and 7.17. CONCLUSIONS: We present a first version of a model for the economic evaluation of treatments for DMD based on the DMDSAT, as well as two alternative frameworks encompassing conventional staging of disease progression. Our findings should be helpful to inform health technology assessments and health economic programmes of future treatments for DMD. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0461-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-10-31 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5253157/ /pubmed/27798808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0461-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Landfeldt, Erik
Alfredsson, Lars
Straub, Volker
Lochmüller, Hanns
Bushby, Katharine
Lindgren, Peter
Economic Evaluation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Model Frameworks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title Economic Evaluation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Model Frameworks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full Economic Evaluation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Model Frameworks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_fullStr Economic Evaluation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Model Frameworks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Economic Evaluation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Model Frameworks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_short Economic Evaluation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Model Frameworks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_sort economic evaluation in duchenne muscular dystrophy: model frameworks for cost-effectiveness analysis
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27798808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0461-5
work_keys_str_mv AT landfeldterik economicevaluationinduchennemusculardystrophymodelframeworksforcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT alfredssonlars economicevaluationinduchennemusculardystrophymodelframeworksforcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT straubvolker economicevaluationinduchennemusculardystrophymodelframeworksforcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT lochmullerhanns economicevaluationinduchennemusculardystrophymodelframeworksforcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT bushbykatharine economicevaluationinduchennemusculardystrophymodelframeworksforcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT lindgrenpeter economicevaluationinduchennemusculardystrophymodelframeworksforcosteffectivenessanalysis