Cargando…
Economic Evaluation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Model Frameworks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
BACKGROUND: Several treatments are on the horizon for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a terminal orphan disease. In many jurisdictions, decisions regarding pricing and reimbursement of these health technologies comprise evidence of value for money. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27798808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0461-5 |
_version_ | 1782498126129528832 |
---|---|
author | Landfeldt, Erik Alfredsson, Lars Straub, Volker Lochmüller, Hanns Bushby, Katharine Lindgren, Peter |
author_facet | Landfeldt, Erik Alfredsson, Lars Straub, Volker Lochmüller, Hanns Bushby, Katharine Lindgren, Peter |
author_sort | Landfeldt, Erik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several treatments are on the horizon for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a terminal orphan disease. In many jurisdictions, decisions regarding pricing and reimbursement of these health technologies comprise evidence of value for money. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a cost-effectiveness model based on the Duchenne muscular dystrophy Functional Ability Self-Assessment Tool (DMDSAT), a new rating scale created specifically to measure disease progression in clinical practice and trials and model DMD in economic evaluations, and compare it with two alternative model structures. METHODS: We constructed three Markov cohort state-transition models to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a hypothetical intervention for DMD versus standard of care in a UK setting. Model I was based on the DMDSAT, model II on stages of disease as defined in the DMD clinical care guidelines and model III on patients’ ventilation status. The conceptual model structures were formulated in collaboration with three DMD experts. RESULTS: All three models were judged to have good validity with regards to the appropriateness of the choice of modelling technique, conceptual representation of the disease, model input data and model outcomes. Across frameworks, lifetime direct medical costs with standard of care ranged between £217,510 and £284,640, total costs between £624,240 and £713,840, and total number of quality-adjusted life-years between 5.96 and 7.17. CONCLUSIONS: We present a first version of a model for the economic evaluation of treatments for DMD based on the DMDSAT, as well as two alternative frameworks encompassing conventional staging of disease progression. Our findings should be helpful to inform health technology assessments and health economic programmes of future treatments for DMD. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0461-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5253157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52531572017-02-03 Economic Evaluation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Model Frameworks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Landfeldt, Erik Alfredsson, Lars Straub, Volker Lochmüller, Hanns Bushby, Katharine Lindgren, Peter Pharmacoeconomics Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Several treatments are on the horizon for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a terminal orphan disease. In many jurisdictions, decisions regarding pricing and reimbursement of these health technologies comprise evidence of value for money. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a cost-effectiveness model based on the Duchenne muscular dystrophy Functional Ability Self-Assessment Tool (DMDSAT), a new rating scale created specifically to measure disease progression in clinical practice and trials and model DMD in economic evaluations, and compare it with two alternative model structures. METHODS: We constructed three Markov cohort state-transition models to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a hypothetical intervention for DMD versus standard of care in a UK setting. Model I was based on the DMDSAT, model II on stages of disease as defined in the DMD clinical care guidelines and model III on patients’ ventilation status. The conceptual model structures were formulated in collaboration with three DMD experts. RESULTS: All three models were judged to have good validity with regards to the appropriateness of the choice of modelling technique, conceptual representation of the disease, model input data and model outcomes. Across frameworks, lifetime direct medical costs with standard of care ranged between £217,510 and £284,640, total costs between £624,240 and £713,840, and total number of quality-adjusted life-years between 5.96 and 7.17. CONCLUSIONS: We present a first version of a model for the economic evaluation of treatments for DMD based on the DMDSAT, as well as two alternative frameworks encompassing conventional staging of disease progression. Our findings should be helpful to inform health technology assessments and health economic programmes of future treatments for DMD. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0461-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-10-31 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5253157/ /pubmed/27798808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0461-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Landfeldt, Erik Alfredsson, Lars Straub, Volker Lochmüller, Hanns Bushby, Katharine Lindgren, Peter Economic Evaluation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Model Frameworks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title | Economic Evaluation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Model Frameworks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_full | Economic Evaluation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Model Frameworks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_fullStr | Economic Evaluation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Model Frameworks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Economic Evaluation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Model Frameworks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_short | Economic Evaluation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Model Frameworks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_sort | economic evaluation in duchenne muscular dystrophy: model frameworks for cost-effectiveness analysis |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27798808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0461-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT landfeldterik economicevaluationinduchennemusculardystrophymodelframeworksforcosteffectivenessanalysis AT alfredssonlars economicevaluationinduchennemusculardystrophymodelframeworksforcosteffectivenessanalysis AT straubvolker economicevaluationinduchennemusculardystrophymodelframeworksforcosteffectivenessanalysis AT lochmullerhanns economicevaluationinduchennemusculardystrophymodelframeworksforcosteffectivenessanalysis AT bushbykatharine economicevaluationinduchennemusculardystrophymodelframeworksforcosteffectivenessanalysis AT lindgrenpeter economicevaluationinduchennemusculardystrophymodelframeworksforcosteffectivenessanalysis |