Cargando…

A Comparison of Radiographic Film Densitometry Using a New Computerized Tool with a Digital Densitometer

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to develop and test a new tool for radiographic densitometry by combining periapical films and aluminum step wedge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 50 Kodak E-speed intraoral films. An aluminum step wedge consisting of 16 steps was constructed. Each step...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fakhar, Hoorieh Bashizadeh, Razavi, Elham Sadat Emadian, Soheilifar, Sepideh, Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28127317
_version_ 1782498138187104256
author Fakhar, Hoorieh Bashizadeh
Razavi, Elham Sadat Emadian
Soheilifar, Sepideh
Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad
author_facet Fakhar, Hoorieh Bashizadeh
Razavi, Elham Sadat Emadian
Soheilifar, Sepideh
Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad
author_sort Fakhar, Hoorieh Bashizadeh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to develop and test a new tool for radiographic densitometry by combining periapical films and aluminum step wedge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 50 Kodak E-speed intraoral films. An aluminum step wedge consisting of 16 steps was constructed. Each step was 1mm×3m×10mm. The step wedge was exposed to varying exposure times, ranging from 0.05 second to 0.5 second, increasing in 0.05 second increments. Films were digitalized after processing and the MATLAB software algorithm was ran subsequently. Density of the films was measured again using a digital densitometer. In order to compare the two imaging techniques, three steps were selected. Output data from the MATLAB algorithm were compared with data obtained from the digital densitometer. RESULTS: The new method could detect significant differences between subsequent exposure times in step 7, while the densitometer did that in steps 7 and 12. The new method’s sensitivity in determining density changes was 5.26%, 84.1% and 93.02% in steps 2, 7, and 12 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our new method has an acceptable sensitivity for determining density changes of at least 7 mmEq/Al.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5253218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52532182017-01-26 A Comparison of Radiographic Film Densitometry Using a New Computerized Tool with a Digital Densitometer Fakhar, Hoorieh Bashizadeh Razavi, Elham Sadat Emadian Soheilifar, Sepideh Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to develop and test a new tool for radiographic densitometry by combining periapical films and aluminum step wedge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 50 Kodak E-speed intraoral films. An aluminum step wedge consisting of 16 steps was constructed. Each step was 1mm×3m×10mm. The step wedge was exposed to varying exposure times, ranging from 0.05 second to 0.5 second, increasing in 0.05 second increments. Films were digitalized after processing and the MATLAB software algorithm was ran subsequently. Density of the films was measured again using a digital densitometer. In order to compare the two imaging techniques, three steps were selected. Output data from the MATLAB algorithm were compared with data obtained from the digital densitometer. RESULTS: The new method could detect significant differences between subsequent exposure times in step 7, while the densitometer did that in steps 7 and 12. The new method’s sensitivity in determining density changes was 5.26%, 84.1% and 93.02% in steps 2, 7, and 12 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our new method has an acceptable sensitivity for determining density changes of at least 7 mmEq/Al. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2016-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5253218/ /pubmed/28127317 Text en Copyright© Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fakhar, Hoorieh Bashizadeh
Razavi, Elham Sadat Emadian
Soheilifar, Sepideh
Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad
A Comparison of Radiographic Film Densitometry Using a New Computerized Tool with a Digital Densitometer
title A Comparison of Radiographic Film Densitometry Using a New Computerized Tool with a Digital Densitometer
title_full A Comparison of Radiographic Film Densitometry Using a New Computerized Tool with a Digital Densitometer
title_fullStr A Comparison of Radiographic Film Densitometry Using a New Computerized Tool with a Digital Densitometer
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Radiographic Film Densitometry Using a New Computerized Tool with a Digital Densitometer
title_short A Comparison of Radiographic Film Densitometry Using a New Computerized Tool with a Digital Densitometer
title_sort comparison of radiographic film densitometry using a new computerized tool with a digital densitometer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28127317
work_keys_str_mv AT fakharhooriehbashizadeh acomparisonofradiographicfilmdensitometryusinganewcomputerizedtoolwithadigitaldensitometer
AT razavielhamsadatemadian acomparisonofradiographicfilmdensitometryusinganewcomputerizedtoolwithadigitaldensitometer
AT soheilifarsepideh acomparisonofradiographicfilmdensitometryusinganewcomputerizedtoolwithadigitaldensitometer
AT kharazifardmohammadjavad acomparisonofradiographicfilmdensitometryusinganewcomputerizedtoolwithadigitaldensitometer
AT fakharhooriehbashizadeh comparisonofradiographicfilmdensitometryusinganewcomputerizedtoolwithadigitaldensitometer
AT razavielhamsadatemadian comparisonofradiographicfilmdensitometryusinganewcomputerizedtoolwithadigitaldensitometer
AT soheilifarsepideh comparisonofradiographicfilmdensitometryusinganewcomputerizedtoolwithadigitaldensitometer
AT kharazifardmohammadjavad comparisonofradiographicfilmdensitometryusinganewcomputerizedtoolwithadigitaldensitometer