Cargando…

Cultural and Species Differences in Gazing Patterns for Marked and Decorated Objects: A Comparative Eye-Tracking Study

Objects from the Middle Paleolithic period colored with ochre and marked with incisions represent the beginning of non-utilitarian object manipulation in different species of the Homo genus. To investigate the visual effects caused by these markings, we compared humans who have different cultural ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mühlenbeck, Cordelia, Jacobsen, Thomas, Pritsch, Carla, Liebal, Katja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28167923
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00006
_version_ 1782498144878067712
author Mühlenbeck, Cordelia
Jacobsen, Thomas
Pritsch, Carla
Liebal, Katja
author_facet Mühlenbeck, Cordelia
Jacobsen, Thomas
Pritsch, Carla
Liebal, Katja
author_sort Mühlenbeck, Cordelia
collection PubMed
description Objects from the Middle Paleolithic period colored with ochre and marked with incisions represent the beginning of non-utilitarian object manipulation in different species of the Homo genus. To investigate the visual effects caused by these markings, we compared humans who have different cultural backgrounds (Namibian hunter–gatherers and German city dwellers) to one species of non-human great apes (orangutans) with respect to their perceptions of markings on objects. We used eye-tracking to analyze their fixation patterns and the durations of their fixations on marked and unmarked stones and sticks. In an additional test, humans evaluated the objects regarding their aesthetic preferences. Our hypotheses were that colorful markings help an individual to structure the surrounding world by making certain features of the environment salient, and that aesthetic appreciation should be associated with this structuring. Our results showed that humans fixated on the marked objects longer and used them in the structural processing of the objects and their background, but did not consistently report finding them more beautiful. Orangutans, in contrast, did not distinguish between object and background in their visual processing and did not clearly fixate longer on the markings. Our results suggest that marking behavior is characteristic for humans and evolved as an attention-directing rather than aesthetic benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5253367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52533672017-02-06 Cultural and Species Differences in Gazing Patterns for Marked and Decorated Objects: A Comparative Eye-Tracking Study Mühlenbeck, Cordelia Jacobsen, Thomas Pritsch, Carla Liebal, Katja Front Psychol Psychology Objects from the Middle Paleolithic period colored with ochre and marked with incisions represent the beginning of non-utilitarian object manipulation in different species of the Homo genus. To investigate the visual effects caused by these markings, we compared humans who have different cultural backgrounds (Namibian hunter–gatherers and German city dwellers) to one species of non-human great apes (orangutans) with respect to their perceptions of markings on objects. We used eye-tracking to analyze their fixation patterns and the durations of their fixations on marked and unmarked stones and sticks. In an additional test, humans evaluated the objects regarding their aesthetic preferences. Our hypotheses were that colorful markings help an individual to structure the surrounding world by making certain features of the environment salient, and that aesthetic appreciation should be associated with this structuring. Our results showed that humans fixated on the marked objects longer and used them in the structural processing of the objects and their background, but did not consistently report finding them more beautiful. Orangutans, in contrast, did not distinguish between object and background in their visual processing and did not clearly fixate longer on the markings. Our results suggest that marking behavior is characteristic for humans and evolved as an attention-directing rather than aesthetic benefit. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5253367/ /pubmed/28167923 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00006 Text en Copyright © 2017 Mühlenbeck, Jacobsen, Pritsch and Liebal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Mühlenbeck, Cordelia
Jacobsen, Thomas
Pritsch, Carla
Liebal, Katja
Cultural and Species Differences in Gazing Patterns for Marked and Decorated Objects: A Comparative Eye-Tracking Study
title Cultural and Species Differences in Gazing Patterns for Marked and Decorated Objects: A Comparative Eye-Tracking Study
title_full Cultural and Species Differences in Gazing Patterns for Marked and Decorated Objects: A Comparative Eye-Tracking Study
title_fullStr Cultural and Species Differences in Gazing Patterns for Marked and Decorated Objects: A Comparative Eye-Tracking Study
title_full_unstemmed Cultural and Species Differences in Gazing Patterns for Marked and Decorated Objects: A Comparative Eye-Tracking Study
title_short Cultural and Species Differences in Gazing Patterns for Marked and Decorated Objects: A Comparative Eye-Tracking Study
title_sort cultural and species differences in gazing patterns for marked and decorated objects: a comparative eye-tracking study
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28167923
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00006
work_keys_str_mv AT muhlenbeckcordelia culturalandspeciesdifferencesingazingpatternsformarkedanddecoratedobjectsacomparativeeyetrackingstudy
AT jacobsenthomas culturalandspeciesdifferencesingazingpatternsformarkedanddecoratedobjectsacomparativeeyetrackingstudy
AT pritschcarla culturalandspeciesdifferencesingazingpatternsformarkedanddecoratedobjectsacomparativeeyetrackingstudy
AT liebalkatja culturalandspeciesdifferencesingazingpatternsformarkedanddecoratedobjectsacomparativeeyetrackingstudy