Cargando…

Assessment of Iterative Closest Point Registration Accuracy for Different Phantom Surfaces Captured by an Optical 3D Sensor in Radiotherapy

An optical 3D sensor provides an additional tool for verification of correct patient settlement on a Tomotherapy treatment machine. The patient's position in the actual treatment is compared with the intended position defined in treatment planning. A commercially available optical 3D sensor mea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krell, Gerald, Saeid Nezhad, Nazila, Walke, Mathias, Al-Hamadi, Ayoub, Gademann, Günther
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28163773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2938504
_version_ 1782498171413331968
author Krell, Gerald
Saeid Nezhad, Nazila
Walke, Mathias
Al-Hamadi, Ayoub
Gademann, Günther
author_facet Krell, Gerald
Saeid Nezhad, Nazila
Walke, Mathias
Al-Hamadi, Ayoub
Gademann, Günther
author_sort Krell, Gerald
collection PubMed
description An optical 3D sensor provides an additional tool for verification of correct patient settlement on a Tomotherapy treatment machine. The patient's position in the actual treatment is compared with the intended position defined in treatment planning. A commercially available optical 3D sensor measures parts of the body surface and estimates the deviation from the desired position without markers. The registration precision of the in-built algorithm and of selected ICP (iterative closest point) algorithms is investigated on surface data of specially designed phantoms captured by the optical 3D sensor for predefined shifts of the treatment table. A rigid body transform is compared with the actual displacement to check registration reliability for predefined limits. The curvature type of investigated phantom bodies has a strong influence on registration result which is more critical for surfaces of low curvature. We investigated the registration accuracy of the optical 3D sensor for the chosen phantoms and compared the results with selected unconstrained ICP algorithms. Safe registration within the clinical limits is only possible for uniquely shaped surface regions, but error metrics based on surface normals improve translational registration. Large registration errors clearly hint at setup deviations, whereas small values do not guarantee correct positioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5253513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52535132017-02-05 Assessment of Iterative Closest Point Registration Accuracy for Different Phantom Surfaces Captured by an Optical 3D Sensor in Radiotherapy Krell, Gerald Saeid Nezhad, Nazila Walke, Mathias Al-Hamadi, Ayoub Gademann, Günther Comput Math Methods Med Research Article An optical 3D sensor provides an additional tool for verification of correct patient settlement on a Tomotherapy treatment machine. The patient's position in the actual treatment is compared with the intended position defined in treatment planning. A commercially available optical 3D sensor measures parts of the body surface and estimates the deviation from the desired position without markers. The registration precision of the in-built algorithm and of selected ICP (iterative closest point) algorithms is investigated on surface data of specially designed phantoms captured by the optical 3D sensor for predefined shifts of the treatment table. A rigid body transform is compared with the actual displacement to check registration reliability for predefined limits. The curvature type of investigated phantom bodies has a strong influence on registration result which is more critical for surfaces of low curvature. We investigated the registration accuracy of the optical 3D sensor for the chosen phantoms and compared the results with selected unconstrained ICP algorithms. Safe registration within the clinical limits is only possible for uniquely shaped surface regions, but error metrics based on surface normals improve translational registration. Large registration errors clearly hint at setup deviations, whereas small values do not guarantee correct positioning. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017 2017-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5253513/ /pubmed/28163773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2938504 Text en Copyright © 2017 Gerald Krell et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Krell, Gerald
Saeid Nezhad, Nazila
Walke, Mathias
Al-Hamadi, Ayoub
Gademann, Günther
Assessment of Iterative Closest Point Registration Accuracy for Different Phantom Surfaces Captured by an Optical 3D Sensor in Radiotherapy
title Assessment of Iterative Closest Point Registration Accuracy for Different Phantom Surfaces Captured by an Optical 3D Sensor in Radiotherapy
title_full Assessment of Iterative Closest Point Registration Accuracy for Different Phantom Surfaces Captured by an Optical 3D Sensor in Radiotherapy
title_fullStr Assessment of Iterative Closest Point Registration Accuracy for Different Phantom Surfaces Captured by an Optical 3D Sensor in Radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Iterative Closest Point Registration Accuracy for Different Phantom Surfaces Captured by an Optical 3D Sensor in Radiotherapy
title_short Assessment of Iterative Closest Point Registration Accuracy for Different Phantom Surfaces Captured by an Optical 3D Sensor in Radiotherapy
title_sort assessment of iterative closest point registration accuracy for different phantom surfaces captured by an optical 3d sensor in radiotherapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28163773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2938504
work_keys_str_mv AT krellgerald assessmentofiterativeclosestpointregistrationaccuracyfordifferentphantomsurfacescapturedbyanoptical3dsensorinradiotherapy
AT saeidnezhadnazila assessmentofiterativeclosestpointregistrationaccuracyfordifferentphantomsurfacescapturedbyanoptical3dsensorinradiotherapy
AT walkemathias assessmentofiterativeclosestpointregistrationaccuracyfordifferentphantomsurfacescapturedbyanoptical3dsensorinradiotherapy
AT alhamadiayoub assessmentofiterativeclosestpointregistrationaccuracyfordifferentphantomsurfacescapturedbyanoptical3dsensorinradiotherapy
AT gademanngunther assessmentofiterativeclosestpointregistrationaccuracyfordifferentphantomsurfacescapturedbyanoptical3dsensorinradiotherapy