Cargando…

Guided and unguided internet-based vestibular rehabilitation versus usual care for dizzy adults of 50 years and older: a protocol for a three-armed randomised trial

INTRODUCTION: Dizziness is a common symptom in general practice with a high prevalence among older adults. The most common cause of dizziness in general practice is peripheral vestibular disease. Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) is a safe and effective treatment for peripheral vestibular disease that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Vugt, Vincent A, van der Wouden, Johannes C, Bosmans, Judith E, Smalbrugge, Martin, van Diest, Willianne, Essery, Rosie, Yardley, Lucy, van der Horst, Henriëtte E, Maarsingh, Otto R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28110290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015479
_version_ 1782498179016556544
author van Vugt, Vincent A
van der Wouden, Johannes C
Bosmans, Judith E
Smalbrugge, Martin
van Diest, Willianne
Essery, Rosie
Yardley, Lucy
van der Horst, Henriëtte E
Maarsingh, Otto R
author_facet van Vugt, Vincent A
van der Wouden, Johannes C
Bosmans, Judith E
Smalbrugge, Martin
van Diest, Willianne
Essery, Rosie
Yardley, Lucy
van der Horst, Henriëtte E
Maarsingh, Otto R
author_sort van Vugt, Vincent A
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Dizziness is a common symptom in general practice with a high prevalence among older adults. The most common cause of dizziness in general practice is peripheral vestibular disease. Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) is a safe and effective treatment for peripheral vestibular disease that entails specific exercises to maximise the central nervous system compensation for the effects of vestibular pathology. An internet-based VR intervention has recently been shown to be safe and effective. Online interventions are low cost and easily accessible, but prone to attrition and non-adherence. A combination of online and face-to-face therapy, known as blended care, may balance these advantages and disadvantages. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A single-blind, three-arm, randomised controlled trial among patients aged 50 years and over presenting with dizziness of vestibular origin in general practice will be performed. In this study, we will compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of stand-alone internet-based VR and internet-based VR with physiotherapeutic support (‘blended care’) with usual care during 6 months of follow-up. We will use a translated Dutch version of a British online VR intervention. Randomisation will be stratified by dizziness severity. The primary outcome measure is the Vertigo Symptoms Scale—Short Form. Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed, adjusting for confounders. The economic evaluation will be conducted from a societal perspective. We will perform an additional analysis on the data to identify predictors of successful treatment in the same population to develop a clinical decision rule for general practitioners. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The ethical committee of the VU University Medical Center approved ethics and dissemination of the study protocol. The insights and results of this study will be widely disseminated through international peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Pre-results, NTR5712.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5253547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52535472017-01-25 Guided and unguided internet-based vestibular rehabilitation versus usual care for dizzy adults of 50 years and older: a protocol for a three-armed randomised trial van Vugt, Vincent A van der Wouden, Johannes C Bosmans, Judith E Smalbrugge, Martin van Diest, Willianne Essery, Rosie Yardley, Lucy van der Horst, Henriëtte E Maarsingh, Otto R BMJ Open General practice / Family practice INTRODUCTION: Dizziness is a common symptom in general practice with a high prevalence among older adults. The most common cause of dizziness in general practice is peripheral vestibular disease. Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) is a safe and effective treatment for peripheral vestibular disease that entails specific exercises to maximise the central nervous system compensation for the effects of vestibular pathology. An internet-based VR intervention has recently been shown to be safe and effective. Online interventions are low cost and easily accessible, but prone to attrition and non-adherence. A combination of online and face-to-face therapy, known as blended care, may balance these advantages and disadvantages. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A single-blind, three-arm, randomised controlled trial among patients aged 50 years and over presenting with dizziness of vestibular origin in general practice will be performed. In this study, we will compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of stand-alone internet-based VR and internet-based VR with physiotherapeutic support (‘blended care’) with usual care during 6 months of follow-up. We will use a translated Dutch version of a British online VR intervention. Randomisation will be stratified by dizziness severity. The primary outcome measure is the Vertigo Symptoms Scale—Short Form. Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed, adjusting for confounders. The economic evaluation will be conducted from a societal perspective. We will perform an additional analysis on the data to identify predictors of successful treatment in the same population to develop a clinical decision rule for general practitioners. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The ethical committee of the VU University Medical Center approved ethics and dissemination of the study protocol. The insights and results of this study will be widely disseminated through international peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Pre-results, NTR5712. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5253547/ /pubmed/28110290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015479 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
van Vugt, Vincent A
van der Wouden, Johannes C
Bosmans, Judith E
Smalbrugge, Martin
van Diest, Willianne
Essery, Rosie
Yardley, Lucy
van der Horst, Henriëtte E
Maarsingh, Otto R
Guided and unguided internet-based vestibular rehabilitation versus usual care for dizzy adults of 50 years and older: a protocol for a three-armed randomised trial
title Guided and unguided internet-based vestibular rehabilitation versus usual care for dizzy adults of 50 years and older: a protocol for a three-armed randomised trial
title_full Guided and unguided internet-based vestibular rehabilitation versus usual care for dizzy adults of 50 years and older: a protocol for a three-armed randomised trial
title_fullStr Guided and unguided internet-based vestibular rehabilitation versus usual care for dizzy adults of 50 years and older: a protocol for a three-armed randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Guided and unguided internet-based vestibular rehabilitation versus usual care for dizzy adults of 50 years and older: a protocol for a three-armed randomised trial
title_short Guided and unguided internet-based vestibular rehabilitation versus usual care for dizzy adults of 50 years and older: a protocol for a three-armed randomised trial
title_sort guided and unguided internet-based vestibular rehabilitation versus usual care for dizzy adults of 50 years and older: a protocol for a three-armed randomised trial
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28110290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015479
work_keys_str_mv AT vanvugtvincenta guidedandunguidedinternetbasedvestibularrehabilitationversususualcarefordizzyadultsof50yearsandolderaprotocolforathreearmedrandomisedtrial
AT vanderwoudenjohannesc guidedandunguidedinternetbasedvestibularrehabilitationversususualcarefordizzyadultsof50yearsandolderaprotocolforathreearmedrandomisedtrial
AT bosmansjudithe guidedandunguidedinternetbasedvestibularrehabilitationversususualcarefordizzyadultsof50yearsandolderaprotocolforathreearmedrandomisedtrial
AT smalbruggemartin guidedandunguidedinternetbasedvestibularrehabilitationversususualcarefordizzyadultsof50yearsandolderaprotocolforathreearmedrandomisedtrial
AT vandiestwillianne guidedandunguidedinternetbasedvestibularrehabilitationversususualcarefordizzyadultsof50yearsandolderaprotocolforathreearmedrandomisedtrial
AT esseryrosie guidedandunguidedinternetbasedvestibularrehabilitationversususualcarefordizzyadultsof50yearsandolderaprotocolforathreearmedrandomisedtrial
AT yardleylucy guidedandunguidedinternetbasedvestibularrehabilitationversususualcarefordizzyadultsof50yearsandolderaprotocolforathreearmedrandomisedtrial
AT vanderhorsthenriettee guidedandunguidedinternetbasedvestibularrehabilitationversususualcarefordizzyadultsof50yearsandolderaprotocolforathreearmedrandomisedtrial
AT maarsinghottor guidedandunguidedinternetbasedvestibularrehabilitationversususualcarefordizzyadultsof50yearsandolderaprotocolforathreearmedrandomisedtrial