Cargando…

Generic prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: To summarise the evidence for generic prognostic factors across a range of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. SETTING: primary care. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: Comprehensive systematic literature review. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO and EMBASE were searched for prospective cohort studies, based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Artus, Majid, Campbell, Paul, Mallen, Christian D, Dunn, Kate M, van der Windt, Danielle A W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28096253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012901
_version_ 1782498183929135104
author Artus, Majid
Campbell, Paul
Mallen, Christian D
Dunn, Kate M
van der Windt, Danielle A W
author_facet Artus, Majid
Campbell, Paul
Mallen, Christian D
Dunn, Kate M
van der Windt, Danielle A W
author_sort Artus, Majid
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To summarise the evidence for generic prognostic factors across a range of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. SETTING: primary care. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: Comprehensive systematic literature review. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO and EMBASE were searched for prospective cohort studies, based in primary care (search period—inception to December 2015). Studies were included if they reported on adults consulting with MSK conditions and provided data on associations between baseline characteristics (prognostic factors) and outcome. A prognostic factor was identified as generic when significantly associated with any outcome for 2 or more different MSK conditions. Evidence synthesis focused on consistency of findings and study quality. RESULTS: 14 682 citations were identified and 78 studies were included (involving more than 48 000 participants with 18 different outcome domains). 51 studies were on spinal pain/back pain/low back pain, 12 on neck/shoulder/arm pain, 3 on knee pain, 3 on hip pain and 9 on multisite pain/widespread pain. Total quality scores ranged from 5 to 14 (mean 11) and 65 studies (83%) scored 9 or more. Out of a total of 78 different prognostic factors for which data were provided, the following factors are considered to be generic prognostic factors for MSK conditions: widespread pain, high functional disability, somatisation, high pain intensity and presence of previous pain episodes. In addition, consistent evidence was found for use of pain medications not to be associated with outcome, suggesting that this factor is not a generic prognostic factor for MSK conditions. CONCLUSIONS: This large review provides new evidence for generic prognostic factors for MSK conditions in primary care. Such factors include pain intensity, widespread pain, high functional disability, somatisation and movement restriction. This information can be used to screen and select patients for targeted treatment in clinical research as well as to inform the management of MSK conditions in primary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5253570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52535702017-01-25 Generic prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review Artus, Majid Campbell, Paul Mallen, Christian D Dunn, Kate M van der Windt, Danielle A W BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVES: To summarise the evidence for generic prognostic factors across a range of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. SETTING: primary care. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: Comprehensive systematic literature review. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO and EMBASE were searched for prospective cohort studies, based in primary care (search period—inception to December 2015). Studies were included if they reported on adults consulting with MSK conditions and provided data on associations between baseline characteristics (prognostic factors) and outcome. A prognostic factor was identified as generic when significantly associated with any outcome for 2 or more different MSK conditions. Evidence synthesis focused on consistency of findings and study quality. RESULTS: 14 682 citations were identified and 78 studies were included (involving more than 48 000 participants with 18 different outcome domains). 51 studies were on spinal pain/back pain/low back pain, 12 on neck/shoulder/arm pain, 3 on knee pain, 3 on hip pain and 9 on multisite pain/widespread pain. Total quality scores ranged from 5 to 14 (mean 11) and 65 studies (83%) scored 9 or more. Out of a total of 78 different prognostic factors for which data were provided, the following factors are considered to be generic prognostic factors for MSK conditions: widespread pain, high functional disability, somatisation, high pain intensity and presence of previous pain episodes. In addition, consistent evidence was found for use of pain medications not to be associated with outcome, suggesting that this factor is not a generic prognostic factor for MSK conditions. CONCLUSIONS: This large review provides new evidence for generic prognostic factors for MSK conditions in primary care. Such factors include pain intensity, widespread pain, high functional disability, somatisation and movement restriction. This information can be used to screen and select patients for targeted treatment in clinical research as well as to inform the management of MSK conditions in primary care. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5253570/ /pubmed/28096253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012901 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Artus, Majid
Campbell, Paul
Mallen, Christian D
Dunn, Kate M
van der Windt, Danielle A W
Generic prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review
title Generic prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review
title_full Generic prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review
title_fullStr Generic prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Generic prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review
title_short Generic prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review
title_sort generic prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28096253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012901
work_keys_str_mv AT artusmajid genericprognosticfactorsformusculoskeletalpaininprimarycareasystematicreview
AT campbellpaul genericprognosticfactorsformusculoskeletalpaininprimarycareasystematicreview
AT mallenchristiand genericprognosticfactorsformusculoskeletalpaininprimarycareasystematicreview
AT dunnkatem genericprognosticfactorsformusculoskeletalpaininprimarycareasystematicreview
AT vanderwindtdanielleaw genericprognosticfactorsformusculoskeletalpaininprimarycareasystematicreview