Cargando…

In patients presenting to the emergency department with skin and soft tissue infections what is the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of abscess compared to the current standard of care? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this systematic review was to determine the accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) in diagnosing abscess in emergency department (ED) patients with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). The secondary objective was the accuracy of POCUS in the paediat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barbic, David, Chenkin, Jordan, Cho, Dennis D, Jelic, Tomislav, Scheuermeyer, Frank X
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28073795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013688
_version_ 1782498190733344768
author Barbic, David
Chenkin, Jordan
Cho, Dennis D
Jelic, Tomislav
Scheuermeyer, Frank X
author_facet Barbic, David
Chenkin, Jordan
Cho, Dennis D
Jelic, Tomislav
Scheuermeyer, Frank X
author_sort Barbic, David
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this systematic review was to determine the accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) in diagnosing abscess in emergency department (ED) patients with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). The secondary objective was the accuracy of POCUS in the paediatric population subgroup. SETTING: Prospective studies set in emergency departments. PARTICIPANTS: Emergency department patients (adult and paediatric) presenting with SSTI and suspected abscess. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: This systematic review was conducted according to Cochrane Handbook guidelines, and the following databases were searched: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews (1946–2015). We included prospective cohort and case–control studies investigating ED patients with SSTI and abscess or cellulitis, a defined POCUS protocol, a clearly defined gold standard for abscess and a contingency table describing sensitivity and specificity. Two reviewers independently ascertained all potentially relevant citations for methodologic quality according to QUADAS-2 criteria. The primary outcome measure was the sensitivity and specificity of POCUS for abscess. A preplanned subgroup (secondary) analysis examined the effects in paediatric populations, and changes in management were explored post hoc. RESULTS: Of 3028 articles, 8 were identified meeting inclusion criteria; all were rated as good to excellent according to QUADAS-2 criteria. Combined test characteristics of POCUS on the ED diagnosis of abscess for patients with SSTI were as follows: sensitivity 96.2% (95% CI 91.1% to 98.4%), specificity 82.9% (95% CI 60.4% to 93.9%), positive likelihood ratio 5.63 (95% CI 2.2 to 14.6) and negative likelihood ratio 0.05 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: A total of 8 studies of good-to-excellent quality were included in this review. The use of POCUS helps differentiate abscess from cellulitis in ED patients with SSTI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015017115.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5253602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52536022017-01-25 In patients presenting to the emergency department with skin and soft tissue infections what is the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of abscess compared to the current standard of care? A systematic review and meta-analysis Barbic, David Chenkin, Jordan Cho, Dennis D Jelic, Tomislav Scheuermeyer, Frank X BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this systematic review was to determine the accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) in diagnosing abscess in emergency department (ED) patients with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). The secondary objective was the accuracy of POCUS in the paediatric population subgroup. SETTING: Prospective studies set in emergency departments. PARTICIPANTS: Emergency department patients (adult and paediatric) presenting with SSTI and suspected abscess. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: This systematic review was conducted according to Cochrane Handbook guidelines, and the following databases were searched: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews (1946–2015). We included prospective cohort and case–control studies investigating ED patients with SSTI and abscess or cellulitis, a defined POCUS protocol, a clearly defined gold standard for abscess and a contingency table describing sensitivity and specificity. Two reviewers independently ascertained all potentially relevant citations for methodologic quality according to QUADAS-2 criteria. The primary outcome measure was the sensitivity and specificity of POCUS for abscess. A preplanned subgroup (secondary) analysis examined the effects in paediatric populations, and changes in management were explored post hoc. RESULTS: Of 3028 articles, 8 were identified meeting inclusion criteria; all were rated as good to excellent according to QUADAS-2 criteria. Combined test characteristics of POCUS on the ED diagnosis of abscess for patients with SSTI were as follows: sensitivity 96.2% (95% CI 91.1% to 98.4%), specificity 82.9% (95% CI 60.4% to 93.9%), positive likelihood ratio 5.63 (95% CI 2.2 to 14.6) and negative likelihood ratio 0.05 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: A total of 8 studies of good-to-excellent quality were included in this review. The use of POCUS helps differentiate abscess from cellulitis in ED patients with SSTI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015017115. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5253602/ /pubmed/28073795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013688 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Barbic, David
Chenkin, Jordan
Cho, Dennis D
Jelic, Tomislav
Scheuermeyer, Frank X
In patients presenting to the emergency department with skin and soft tissue infections what is the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of abscess compared to the current standard of care? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title In patients presenting to the emergency department with skin and soft tissue infections what is the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of abscess compared to the current standard of care? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full In patients presenting to the emergency department with skin and soft tissue infections what is the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of abscess compared to the current standard of care? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr In patients presenting to the emergency department with skin and soft tissue infections what is the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of abscess compared to the current standard of care? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed In patients presenting to the emergency department with skin and soft tissue infections what is the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of abscess compared to the current standard of care? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short In patients presenting to the emergency department with skin and soft tissue infections what is the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of abscess compared to the current standard of care? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort in patients presenting to the emergency department with skin and soft tissue infections what is the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of abscess compared to the current standard of care? a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28073795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013688
work_keys_str_mv AT barbicdavid inpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithskinandsofttissueinfectionswhatisthediagnosticaccuracyofpointofcareultrasonographyforthediagnosisofabscesscomparedtothecurrentstandardofcareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenkinjordan inpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithskinandsofttissueinfectionswhatisthediagnosticaccuracyofpointofcareultrasonographyforthediagnosisofabscesscomparedtothecurrentstandardofcareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chodennisd inpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithskinandsofttissueinfectionswhatisthediagnosticaccuracyofpointofcareultrasonographyforthediagnosisofabscesscomparedtothecurrentstandardofcareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jelictomislav inpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithskinandsofttissueinfectionswhatisthediagnosticaccuracyofpointofcareultrasonographyforthediagnosisofabscesscomparedtothecurrentstandardofcareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT scheuermeyerfrankx inpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithskinandsofttissueinfectionswhatisthediagnosticaccuracyofpointofcareultrasonographyforthediagnosisofabscesscomparedtothecurrentstandardofcareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis