Cargando…
Rethinking clinical governance: healthcare professionals’ views: a Delphi study
OBJECTIVE: Although the guiding principle of clinical governance states that healthcare professionals are the leading contributors to quality and safety in healthcare, little is known about what healthcare professionals perceive as important for clinical governance. The aim of this study is to clari...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28082364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012591 |
_version_ | 1782498213220057088 |
---|---|
author | Veenstra, Gepke L Ahaus, Kees Welker, Gera A Heineman, Erik van der Laan, Maarten J Muntinghe, Friso L H |
author_facet | Veenstra, Gepke L Ahaus, Kees Welker, Gera A Heineman, Erik van der Laan, Maarten J Muntinghe, Friso L H |
author_sort | Veenstra, Gepke L |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Although the guiding principle of clinical governance states that healthcare professionals are the leading contributors to quality and safety in healthcare, little is known about what healthcare professionals perceive as important for clinical governance. The aim of this study is to clarify this by exploring healthcare professionals' views on clinical governance. DESIGN: Based on a literature search, a list of 99 elements related to clinical governance was constructed. This list was refined, extended and restricted during a three-round Delphi study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The panel of experts was formed of 24 healthcare professionals from an academic hospital that is seen as a leader in terms of its clinical governance expertise in the Netherlands. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rated importance of each element on a four-point scale. RESULTS: The 50 elements that the panel perceived as most important related to adopting a bottom-up approach to clinical governance, ownership, teamwork, learning from mistakes and feedback. The panel did not reach a consensus concerning elements that referred to patient involvement. Elements that referred to a managerial approach to clinical governance and standardisation of work were rejected by the panel. CONCLUSIONS: In the views of the panel of experts, clinical governance is a practice-based, value-driven approach that has the goal of delivering the highest possible quality care and ensuring the safety of patients. Bottom-up approaches and effective teamwork are seen as crucial for high quality and safe healthcare. Striving for high quality and safe healthcare is underpinned by continuous learning, shared responsibility and good relationships and collaboration between healthcare professionals, managers and patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5253713 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52537132017-01-25 Rethinking clinical governance: healthcare professionals’ views: a Delphi study Veenstra, Gepke L Ahaus, Kees Welker, Gera A Heineman, Erik van der Laan, Maarten J Muntinghe, Friso L H BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVE: Although the guiding principle of clinical governance states that healthcare professionals are the leading contributors to quality and safety in healthcare, little is known about what healthcare professionals perceive as important for clinical governance. The aim of this study is to clarify this by exploring healthcare professionals' views on clinical governance. DESIGN: Based on a literature search, a list of 99 elements related to clinical governance was constructed. This list was refined, extended and restricted during a three-round Delphi study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The panel of experts was formed of 24 healthcare professionals from an academic hospital that is seen as a leader in terms of its clinical governance expertise in the Netherlands. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rated importance of each element on a four-point scale. RESULTS: The 50 elements that the panel perceived as most important related to adopting a bottom-up approach to clinical governance, ownership, teamwork, learning from mistakes and feedback. The panel did not reach a consensus concerning elements that referred to patient involvement. Elements that referred to a managerial approach to clinical governance and standardisation of work were rejected by the panel. CONCLUSIONS: In the views of the panel of experts, clinical governance is a practice-based, value-driven approach that has the goal of delivering the highest possible quality care and ensuring the safety of patients. Bottom-up approaches and effective teamwork are seen as crucial for high quality and safe healthcare. Striving for high quality and safe healthcare is underpinned by continuous learning, shared responsibility and good relationships and collaboration between healthcare professionals, managers and patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5253713/ /pubmed/28082364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012591 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Policy Veenstra, Gepke L Ahaus, Kees Welker, Gera A Heineman, Erik van der Laan, Maarten J Muntinghe, Friso L H Rethinking clinical governance: healthcare professionals’ views: a Delphi study |
title | Rethinking clinical governance: healthcare professionals’ views: a Delphi study |
title_full | Rethinking clinical governance: healthcare professionals’ views: a Delphi study |
title_fullStr | Rethinking clinical governance: healthcare professionals’ views: a Delphi study |
title_full_unstemmed | Rethinking clinical governance: healthcare professionals’ views: a Delphi study |
title_short | Rethinking clinical governance: healthcare professionals’ views: a Delphi study |
title_sort | rethinking clinical governance: healthcare professionals’ views: a delphi study |
topic | Health Policy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28082364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012591 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT veenstragepkel rethinkingclinicalgovernancehealthcareprofessionalsviewsadelphistudy AT ahauskees rethinkingclinicalgovernancehealthcareprofessionalsviewsadelphistudy AT welkergeraa rethinkingclinicalgovernancehealthcareprofessionalsviewsadelphistudy AT heinemanerik rethinkingclinicalgovernancehealthcareprofessionalsviewsadelphistudy AT vanderlaanmaartenj rethinkingclinicalgovernancehealthcareprofessionalsviewsadelphistudy AT muntinghefrisolh rethinkingclinicalgovernancehealthcareprofessionalsviewsadelphistudy |