Cargando…
Early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the EAGLE trial
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) compared to standard care. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a multicentre pragmatic two-arm randomised controlled trial...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28087548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013254 |
_version_ | 1782498213749587968 |
---|---|
author | Javanbakht, Mehdi Azuara-Blanco, Augusto Burr, Jennifer M Ramsay, Craig Cooper, David Cochran, Claire Norrie, John Scotland, Graham |
author_facet | Javanbakht, Mehdi Azuara-Blanco, Augusto Burr, Jennifer M Ramsay, Craig Cooper, David Cochran, Claire Norrie, John Scotland, Graham |
author_sort | Javanbakht, Mehdi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) compared to standard care. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a multicentre pragmatic two-arm randomised controlled trial. Patients were followed-up for 36 months, and data on health service usage and health state utility were collected and analysed within the trial time horizon. A Markov model was developed to extrapolate the results over a 5-year and 10-year time horizon. SETTING: 22 hospital eye services in the UK. POPULATION: Males and females aged 50 years or over with newly diagnosed PACG or primary angle closure (PAC). INTERVENTIONS: Lens extraction compared to standard care (ie, laser iridotomy followed by medical therapy and glaucoma surgery). OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs of primary and secondary healthcare usage (UK NHS perspective), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for lens extraction versus standard care. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 67.5 (8.42), 57.5% were women, 44.6% had both eyes eligible, 1.4% were of Asian ethnicity and 35.4% had PAC. The mean health service costs were higher in patients randomised to lens extraction: £2467 vs £1486. The mean adjusted QALYs were also higher with early lens extraction: 2.602 vs 2.533. The ICER for lens extraction versus standard care was £14 284 per QALY gained at three years. Modelling suggests that the ICER may drop to £7090 per QALY gained by 5 years and that lens extraction may be cost saving by 10 years. Our results are generally robust to changes in the key input parameters and assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: We find that lens extraction has a 67–89% chance of being cost-effective at 3 years and that it may be cost saving by 10 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN44464607; Results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5253715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52537152017-01-25 Early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the EAGLE trial Javanbakht, Mehdi Azuara-Blanco, Augusto Burr, Jennifer M Ramsay, Craig Cooper, David Cochran, Claire Norrie, John Scotland, Graham BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) compared to standard care. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a multicentre pragmatic two-arm randomised controlled trial. Patients were followed-up for 36 months, and data on health service usage and health state utility were collected and analysed within the trial time horizon. A Markov model was developed to extrapolate the results over a 5-year and 10-year time horizon. SETTING: 22 hospital eye services in the UK. POPULATION: Males and females aged 50 years or over with newly diagnosed PACG or primary angle closure (PAC). INTERVENTIONS: Lens extraction compared to standard care (ie, laser iridotomy followed by medical therapy and glaucoma surgery). OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs of primary and secondary healthcare usage (UK NHS perspective), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for lens extraction versus standard care. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 67.5 (8.42), 57.5% were women, 44.6% had both eyes eligible, 1.4% were of Asian ethnicity and 35.4% had PAC. The mean health service costs were higher in patients randomised to lens extraction: £2467 vs £1486. The mean adjusted QALYs were also higher with early lens extraction: 2.602 vs 2.533. The ICER for lens extraction versus standard care was £14 284 per QALY gained at three years. Modelling suggests that the ICER may drop to £7090 per QALY gained by 5 years and that lens extraction may be cost saving by 10 years. Our results are generally robust to changes in the key input parameters and assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: We find that lens extraction has a 67–89% chance of being cost-effective at 3 years and that it may be cost saving by 10 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN44464607; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5253715/ /pubmed/28087548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013254 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Economics Javanbakht, Mehdi Azuara-Blanco, Augusto Burr, Jennifer M Ramsay, Craig Cooper, David Cochran, Claire Norrie, John Scotland, Graham Early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the EAGLE trial |
title | Early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the EAGLE trial |
title_full | Early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the EAGLE trial |
title_fullStr | Early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the EAGLE trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the EAGLE trial |
title_short | Early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the EAGLE trial |
title_sort | early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the eagle trial |
topic | Health Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28087548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013254 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT javanbakhtmehdi earlylensextractionwithintraocularlensimplantationforthetreatmentofprimaryangleclosureglaucomaaneconomicevaluationbasedondatafromtheeagletrial AT azuarablancoaugusto earlylensextractionwithintraocularlensimplantationforthetreatmentofprimaryangleclosureglaucomaaneconomicevaluationbasedondatafromtheeagletrial AT burrjenniferm earlylensextractionwithintraocularlensimplantationforthetreatmentofprimaryangleclosureglaucomaaneconomicevaluationbasedondatafromtheeagletrial AT ramsaycraig earlylensextractionwithintraocularlensimplantationforthetreatmentofprimaryangleclosureglaucomaaneconomicevaluationbasedondatafromtheeagletrial AT cooperdavid earlylensextractionwithintraocularlensimplantationforthetreatmentofprimaryangleclosureglaucomaaneconomicevaluationbasedondatafromtheeagletrial AT cochranclaire earlylensextractionwithintraocularlensimplantationforthetreatmentofprimaryangleclosureglaucomaaneconomicevaluationbasedondatafromtheeagletrial AT norriejohn earlylensextractionwithintraocularlensimplantationforthetreatmentofprimaryangleclosureglaucomaaneconomicevaluationbasedondatafromtheeagletrial AT scotlandgraham earlylensextractionwithintraocularlensimplantationforthetreatmentofprimaryangleclosureglaucomaaneconomicevaluationbasedondatafromtheeagletrial |