Cargando…

Early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the EAGLE trial

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) compared to standard care. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a multicentre pragmatic two-arm randomised controlled trial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Javanbakht, Mehdi, Azuara-Blanco, Augusto, Burr, Jennifer M, Ramsay, Craig, Cooper, David, Cochran, Claire, Norrie, John, Scotland, Graham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28087548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013254
_version_ 1782498213749587968
author Javanbakht, Mehdi
Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
Burr, Jennifer M
Ramsay, Craig
Cooper, David
Cochran, Claire
Norrie, John
Scotland, Graham
author_facet Javanbakht, Mehdi
Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
Burr, Jennifer M
Ramsay, Craig
Cooper, David
Cochran, Claire
Norrie, John
Scotland, Graham
author_sort Javanbakht, Mehdi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) compared to standard care. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a multicentre pragmatic two-arm randomised controlled trial. Patients were followed-up for 36 months, and data on health service usage and health state utility were collected and analysed within the trial time horizon. A Markov model was developed to extrapolate the results over a 5-year and 10-year time horizon. SETTING: 22 hospital eye services in the UK. POPULATION: Males and females aged 50 years or over with newly diagnosed PACG or primary angle closure (PAC). INTERVENTIONS: Lens extraction compared to standard care (ie, laser iridotomy followed by medical therapy and glaucoma surgery). OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs of primary and secondary healthcare usage (UK NHS perspective), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for lens extraction versus standard care. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 67.5 (8.42), 57.5% were women, 44.6% had both eyes eligible, 1.4% were of Asian ethnicity and 35.4% had PAC. The mean health service costs were higher in patients randomised to lens extraction: £2467 vs £1486. The mean adjusted QALYs were also higher with early lens extraction: 2.602 vs 2.533. The ICER for lens extraction versus standard care was £14 284 per QALY gained at three years. Modelling suggests that the ICER may drop to £7090 per QALY gained by 5 years and that lens extraction may be cost saving by 10 years. Our results are generally robust to changes in the key input parameters and assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: We find that lens extraction has a 67–89% chance of being cost-effective at 3 years and that it may be cost saving by 10 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN44464607; Results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5253715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52537152017-01-25 Early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the EAGLE trial Javanbakht, Mehdi Azuara-Blanco, Augusto Burr, Jennifer M Ramsay, Craig Cooper, David Cochran, Claire Norrie, John Scotland, Graham BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) compared to standard care. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a multicentre pragmatic two-arm randomised controlled trial. Patients were followed-up for 36 months, and data on health service usage and health state utility were collected and analysed within the trial time horizon. A Markov model was developed to extrapolate the results over a 5-year and 10-year time horizon. SETTING: 22 hospital eye services in the UK. POPULATION: Males and females aged 50 years or over with newly diagnosed PACG or primary angle closure (PAC). INTERVENTIONS: Lens extraction compared to standard care (ie, laser iridotomy followed by medical therapy and glaucoma surgery). OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs of primary and secondary healthcare usage (UK NHS perspective), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for lens extraction versus standard care. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 67.5 (8.42), 57.5% were women, 44.6% had both eyes eligible, 1.4% were of Asian ethnicity and 35.4% had PAC. The mean health service costs were higher in patients randomised to lens extraction: £2467 vs £1486. The mean adjusted QALYs were also higher with early lens extraction: 2.602 vs 2.533. The ICER for lens extraction versus standard care was £14 284 per QALY gained at three years. Modelling suggests that the ICER may drop to £7090 per QALY gained by 5 years and that lens extraction may be cost saving by 10 years. Our results are generally robust to changes in the key input parameters and assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: We find that lens extraction has a 67–89% chance of being cost-effective at 3 years and that it may be cost saving by 10 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN44464607; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5253715/ /pubmed/28087548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013254 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Economics
Javanbakht, Mehdi
Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
Burr, Jennifer M
Ramsay, Craig
Cooper, David
Cochran, Claire
Norrie, John
Scotland, Graham
Early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the EAGLE trial
title Early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the EAGLE trial
title_full Early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the EAGLE trial
title_fullStr Early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the EAGLE trial
title_full_unstemmed Early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the EAGLE trial
title_short Early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the EAGLE trial
title_sort early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the eagle trial
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28087548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013254
work_keys_str_mv AT javanbakhtmehdi earlylensextractionwithintraocularlensimplantationforthetreatmentofprimaryangleclosureglaucomaaneconomicevaluationbasedondatafromtheeagletrial
AT azuarablancoaugusto earlylensextractionwithintraocularlensimplantationforthetreatmentofprimaryangleclosureglaucomaaneconomicevaluationbasedondatafromtheeagletrial
AT burrjenniferm earlylensextractionwithintraocularlensimplantationforthetreatmentofprimaryangleclosureglaucomaaneconomicevaluationbasedondatafromtheeagletrial
AT ramsaycraig earlylensextractionwithintraocularlensimplantationforthetreatmentofprimaryangleclosureglaucomaaneconomicevaluationbasedondatafromtheeagletrial
AT cooperdavid earlylensextractionwithintraocularlensimplantationforthetreatmentofprimaryangleclosureglaucomaaneconomicevaluationbasedondatafromtheeagletrial
AT cochranclaire earlylensextractionwithintraocularlensimplantationforthetreatmentofprimaryangleclosureglaucomaaneconomicevaluationbasedondatafromtheeagletrial
AT norriejohn earlylensextractionwithintraocularlensimplantationforthetreatmentofprimaryangleclosureglaucomaaneconomicevaluationbasedondatafromtheeagletrial
AT scotlandgraham earlylensextractionwithintraocularlensimplantationforthetreatmentofprimaryangleclosureglaucomaaneconomicevaluationbasedondatafromtheeagletrial