Cargando…
The Hubble Constant
I review the current state of determinations of the Hubble constant, which gives the length scale of the Universe by relating the expansion velocity of objects to their distance. There are two broad categories of measurements. The first uses individual astrophysical objects which have some property...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28163628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/lrr-2015-2 |
_version_ | 1782498231309041664 |
---|---|
author | Jackson, Neal |
author_facet | Jackson, Neal |
author_sort | Jackson, Neal |
collection | PubMed |
description | I review the current state of determinations of the Hubble constant, which gives the length scale of the Universe by relating the expansion velocity of objects to their distance. There are two broad categories of measurements. The first uses individual astrophysical objects which have some property that allows their intrinsic luminosity or size to be determined, or allows the determination of their distance by geometric means. The second category comprises the use of all-sky cosmic microwave background, or correlations between large samples of galaxies, to determine information about the geometry of the Universe and hence the Hubble constant, typically in a combination with other cosmological parameters. Many, but not all, object-based measurements give H(0) values of around 72–74 km s(−1) Mpc(−1), with typical errors of 2–3 km s(−1) Mpc(−1). This is in mild discrepancy with CMB-based measurements, in particular those from the Planck satellite, which give values of 67–68 km s(−1) Mpc(−1) and typical errors of 1–2 km s(−1) Mpc(−1). The size of the remaining systematics indicate that accuracy rather than precision is the remaining problem in a good determination of the Hubble constant. Whether a discrepancy exists, and whether new physics is needed to resolve it, depends on details of the systematics of the object-based methods, and also on the assumptions about other cosmological parameters and which datasets are combined in the case of the all-sky methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5253801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52538012017-02-03 The Hubble Constant Jackson, Neal Living Rev Relativ Review Article I review the current state of determinations of the Hubble constant, which gives the length scale of the Universe by relating the expansion velocity of objects to their distance. There are two broad categories of measurements. The first uses individual astrophysical objects which have some property that allows their intrinsic luminosity or size to be determined, or allows the determination of their distance by geometric means. The second category comprises the use of all-sky cosmic microwave background, or correlations between large samples of galaxies, to determine information about the geometry of the Universe and hence the Hubble constant, typically in a combination with other cosmological parameters. Many, but not all, object-based measurements give H(0) values of around 72–74 km s(−1) Mpc(−1), with typical errors of 2–3 km s(−1) Mpc(−1). This is in mild discrepancy with CMB-based measurements, in particular those from the Planck satellite, which give values of 67–68 km s(−1) Mpc(−1) and typical errors of 1–2 km s(−1) Mpc(−1). The size of the remaining systematics indicate that accuracy rather than precision is the remaining problem in a good determination of the Hubble constant. Whether a discrepancy exists, and whether new physics is needed to resolve it, depends on details of the systematics of the object-based methods, and also on the assumptions about other cosmological parameters and which datasets are combined in the case of the all-sky methods. Springer International Publishing 2015-09-24 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC5253801/ /pubmed/28163628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/lrr-2015-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Jackson, Neal The Hubble Constant |
title | The Hubble Constant |
title_full | The Hubble Constant |
title_fullStr | The Hubble Constant |
title_full_unstemmed | The Hubble Constant |
title_short | The Hubble Constant |
title_sort | hubble constant |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28163628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/lrr-2015-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jacksonneal thehubbleconstant AT jacksonneal hubbleconstant |