Cargando…

Comparing Three Data Mining Methods to Predict Kidney Transplant Survival

INTRODUCTION: One of the most important complications of post-transplant is rejection. Analyzing survival is one of the areas of medical prognosis and data mining, as an effective approach, has the capacity of analyzing and estimating outcomes in advance through discovering appropriate models among...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shahmoradi, Leila, Langarizadeh, Mostafa, Pourmand, Gholamreza, fard, Ziba Aghsaei, Borhani, Alireza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28163356
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.322-327
_version_ 1782498636742000640
author Shahmoradi, Leila
Langarizadeh, Mostafa
Pourmand, Gholamreza
fard, Ziba Aghsaei
Borhani, Alireza
author_facet Shahmoradi, Leila
Langarizadeh, Mostafa
Pourmand, Gholamreza
fard, Ziba Aghsaei
Borhani, Alireza
author_sort Shahmoradi, Leila
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: One of the most important complications of post-transplant is rejection. Analyzing survival is one of the areas of medical prognosis and data mining, as an effective approach, has the capacity of analyzing and estimating outcomes in advance through discovering appropriate models among data. The present study aims at comparing the effectiveness of C5.0 algorithms, neural network and C&RTree to predict kidney transplant survival before transplant. METHOD: To detect factors effective in predicting transplant survival, information needs analysis was performed via a researcher-made questionnaire. A checklist was prepared and data of 513 kidney disease patient files were extracted from Sina Urology Research Center. Following CRISP methodology for data mining, IBM SPSS Modeler 14.2, C5.0, C&RTree algorithms and neural network were used. RESULTS: Body Mass Index (BMI), cause of renal dysfunction and duration of dialysis were evaluated in all three models as the most effective factors in transplant survival. C5.0 algorithm with the highest validity (96.77%) was the first in estimating kidney transplant survival in patients followed by C&RTree (83.7%) and neural network (79.5%) models. CONCLUSION: Among the three models, C5.0 algorithm was the top model with high validity that confirms its strength in predicting survival. The most effective kidney transplant survival factors were detected in this study; therefore, duration of transplant survival (year) can be determined considering the regulations set for a new sample with specific characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5256037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52560372017-02-03 Comparing Three Data Mining Methods to Predict Kidney Transplant Survival Shahmoradi, Leila Langarizadeh, Mostafa Pourmand, Gholamreza fard, Ziba Aghsaei Borhani, Alireza Acta Inform Med Original Paper INTRODUCTION: One of the most important complications of post-transplant is rejection. Analyzing survival is one of the areas of medical prognosis and data mining, as an effective approach, has the capacity of analyzing and estimating outcomes in advance through discovering appropriate models among data. The present study aims at comparing the effectiveness of C5.0 algorithms, neural network and C&RTree to predict kidney transplant survival before transplant. METHOD: To detect factors effective in predicting transplant survival, information needs analysis was performed via a researcher-made questionnaire. A checklist was prepared and data of 513 kidney disease patient files were extracted from Sina Urology Research Center. Following CRISP methodology for data mining, IBM SPSS Modeler 14.2, C5.0, C&RTree algorithms and neural network were used. RESULTS: Body Mass Index (BMI), cause of renal dysfunction and duration of dialysis were evaluated in all three models as the most effective factors in transplant survival. C5.0 algorithm with the highest validity (96.77%) was the first in estimating kidney transplant survival in patients followed by C&RTree (83.7%) and neural network (79.5%) models. CONCLUSION: Among the three models, C5.0 algorithm was the top model with high validity that confirms its strength in predicting survival. The most effective kidney transplant survival factors were detected in this study; therefore, duration of transplant survival (year) can be determined considering the regulations set for a new sample with specific characteristics. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016-10 2016-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5256037/ /pubmed/28163356 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.322-327 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Leila Shahmoradi, Mostafa Langarizadeh, Gholamreza Pourmand, Ziba Aghsaei fard, and Alireza Borhani http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Shahmoradi, Leila
Langarizadeh, Mostafa
Pourmand, Gholamreza
fard, Ziba Aghsaei
Borhani, Alireza
Comparing Three Data Mining Methods to Predict Kidney Transplant Survival
title Comparing Three Data Mining Methods to Predict Kidney Transplant Survival
title_full Comparing Three Data Mining Methods to Predict Kidney Transplant Survival
title_fullStr Comparing Three Data Mining Methods to Predict Kidney Transplant Survival
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Three Data Mining Methods to Predict Kidney Transplant Survival
title_short Comparing Three Data Mining Methods to Predict Kidney Transplant Survival
title_sort comparing three data mining methods to predict kidney transplant survival
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28163356
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.322-327
work_keys_str_mv AT shahmoradileila comparingthreedataminingmethodstopredictkidneytransplantsurvival
AT langarizadehmostafa comparingthreedataminingmethodstopredictkidneytransplantsurvival
AT pourmandgholamreza comparingthreedataminingmethodstopredictkidneytransplantsurvival
AT fardzibaaghsaei comparingthreedataminingmethodstopredictkidneytransplantsurvival
AT borhanialireza comparingthreedataminingmethodstopredictkidneytransplantsurvival