Cargando…

SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process

Since the publication of Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) guidelines in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this manuscript, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogrinc, Greg, Davies, Louise, Goodman, Daisy, Batalden, Paul, Davidoff, Frank, Stevens, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26369893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411
_version_ 1782498672624271360
author Ogrinc, Greg
Davies, Louise
Goodman, Daisy
Batalden, Paul
Davidoff, Frank
Stevens, David
author_facet Ogrinc, Greg
Davies, Louise
Goodman, Daisy
Batalden, Paul
Davidoff, Frank
Stevens, David
author_sort Ogrinc, Greg
collection PubMed
description Since the publication of Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) guidelines in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this manuscript, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) semistructured interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) two face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasises the reporting of three key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value and safety of healthcare: the use of formal and informal theory in planning, implementing and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve healthcare, recognising that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (http://www.squire-statement.org).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5256233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52562332017-01-25 SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process Ogrinc, Greg Davies, Louise Goodman, Daisy Batalden, Paul Davidoff, Frank Stevens, David BMJ Qual Saf Research and Reporting Methodology Since the publication of Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) guidelines in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this manuscript, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) semistructured interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) two face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasises the reporting of three key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value and safety of healthcare: the use of formal and informal theory in planning, implementing and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve healthcare, recognising that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (http://www.squire-statement.org). BMJ Publishing Group 2016-12 2015-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5256233/ /pubmed/26369893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research and Reporting Methodology
Ogrinc, Greg
Davies, Louise
Goodman, Daisy
Batalden, Paul
Davidoff, Frank
Stevens, David
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process
title SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process
title_full SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process
title_fullStr SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process
title_full_unstemmed SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process
title_short SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process
title_sort squire 2.0 (standards for quality improvement reporting excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process
topic Research and Reporting Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26369893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411
work_keys_str_mv AT ogrincgreg squire20standardsforqualityimprovementreportingexcellencerevisedpublicationguidelinesfromadetailedconsensusprocess
AT davieslouise squire20standardsforqualityimprovementreportingexcellencerevisedpublicationguidelinesfromadetailedconsensusprocess
AT goodmandaisy squire20standardsforqualityimprovementreportingexcellencerevisedpublicationguidelinesfromadetailedconsensusprocess
AT bataldenpaul squire20standardsforqualityimprovementreportingexcellencerevisedpublicationguidelinesfromadetailedconsensusprocess
AT davidofffrank squire20standardsforqualityimprovementreportingexcellencerevisedpublicationguidelinesfromadetailedconsensusprocess
AT stevensdavid squire20standardsforqualityimprovementreportingexcellencerevisedpublicationguidelinesfromadetailedconsensusprocess