Cargando…
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process
Since the publication of Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) guidelines in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this manuscript, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26369893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411 |
_version_ | 1782498672624271360 |
---|---|
author | Ogrinc, Greg Davies, Louise Goodman, Daisy Batalden, Paul Davidoff, Frank Stevens, David |
author_facet | Ogrinc, Greg Davies, Louise Goodman, Daisy Batalden, Paul Davidoff, Frank Stevens, David |
author_sort | Ogrinc, Greg |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since the publication of Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) guidelines in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this manuscript, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) semistructured interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) two face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasises the reporting of three key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value and safety of healthcare: the use of formal and informal theory in planning, implementing and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve healthcare, recognising that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (http://www.squire-statement.org). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5256233 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52562332017-01-25 SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process Ogrinc, Greg Davies, Louise Goodman, Daisy Batalden, Paul Davidoff, Frank Stevens, David BMJ Qual Saf Research and Reporting Methodology Since the publication of Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) guidelines in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this manuscript, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) semistructured interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) two face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasises the reporting of three key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value and safety of healthcare: the use of formal and informal theory in planning, implementing and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve healthcare, recognising that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (http://www.squire-statement.org). BMJ Publishing Group 2016-12 2015-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5256233/ /pubmed/26369893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research and Reporting Methodology Ogrinc, Greg Davies, Louise Goodman, Daisy Batalden, Paul Davidoff, Frank Stevens, David SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process |
title | SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process |
title_full | SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process |
title_fullStr | SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process |
title_full_unstemmed | SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process |
title_short | SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process |
title_sort | squire 2.0 (standards for quality improvement reporting excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process |
topic | Research and Reporting Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26369893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ogrincgreg squire20standardsforqualityimprovementreportingexcellencerevisedpublicationguidelinesfromadetailedconsensusprocess AT davieslouise squire20standardsforqualityimprovementreportingexcellencerevisedpublicationguidelinesfromadetailedconsensusprocess AT goodmandaisy squire20standardsforqualityimprovementreportingexcellencerevisedpublicationguidelinesfromadetailedconsensusprocess AT bataldenpaul squire20standardsforqualityimprovementreportingexcellencerevisedpublicationguidelinesfromadetailedconsensusprocess AT davidofffrank squire20standardsforqualityimprovementreportingexcellencerevisedpublicationguidelinesfromadetailedconsensusprocess AT stevensdavid squire20standardsforqualityimprovementreportingexcellencerevisedpublicationguidelinesfromadetailedconsensusprocess |