Cargando…
Determination of a single, universal threshold for caesarean section rate is not the way forward
Autores principales: | Betrán, Ana Pilar, Zhang, Jun, Torloni, Maria Regina, Gülmezoglu, A Metin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27664175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2016-110393 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014
por: Betrán, Ana Pilar, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
A Systematic Review of the Robson Classification for Caesarean Section: What Works, Doesn't Work and How to Improve It
por: Betrán, Ana Pilar, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies
por: Betran, Ana Pilar, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Mass media campaigns to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections: a systematic review
por: Torloni, Maria Regina, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population‐based ecological study with longitudinal data
por: Ye, J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)