Cargando…
Breath in the technoscientific imaginary
Breath has a realist function in most artistic media. It serves to remind the reader, the viewer or the spectator of the exigencies of the body. In science fiction (SF) literature and films, breath is often a plot device for human encounters with otherness, either with alien peoples, who may not bre...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27542677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2016-010908 |
_version_ | 1782498710160146432 |
---|---|
author | Rose, Arthur |
author_facet | Rose, Arthur |
author_sort | Rose, Arthur |
collection | PubMed |
description | Breath has a realist function in most artistic media. It serves to remind the reader, the viewer or the spectator of the exigencies of the body. In science fiction (SF) literature and films, breath is often a plot device for human encounters with otherness, either with alien peoples, who may not breathe oxygen, or environments, where there may not be oxygen to breathe. But while there is a technoscientific quality to breath in SF, especially in its attention to physiological systems, concentrating on the technoscientific threatens to occlude other, more affective aspects raised by the literature. In order to supplement the tendency to read SF as a succession of technoscientific accounts of bodily experience, this paper recalls how SF texts draw attention to the affective, non-scientific qualities of breath, both as a metonym for life and as a metaphor for anticipation. Through an engagement with diverse examples from SF literature and films, this article considers the tension between technoscientific and affective responses to breath in order to demonstrate breath's co-determinacy in SF's blending of scientific and artistic discourses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5256420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52564202017-01-25 Breath in the technoscientific imaginary Rose, Arthur Med Humanit Electronic pages - Science fiction and medical humanities Breath has a realist function in most artistic media. It serves to remind the reader, the viewer or the spectator of the exigencies of the body. In science fiction (SF) literature and films, breath is often a plot device for human encounters with otherness, either with alien peoples, who may not breathe oxygen, or environments, where there may not be oxygen to breathe. But while there is a technoscientific quality to breath in SF, especially in its attention to physiological systems, concentrating on the technoscientific threatens to occlude other, more affective aspects raised by the literature. In order to supplement the tendency to read SF as a succession of technoscientific accounts of bodily experience, this paper recalls how SF texts draw attention to the affective, non-scientific qualities of breath, both as a metonym for life and as a metaphor for anticipation. Through an engagement with diverse examples from SF literature and films, this article considers the tension between technoscientific and affective responses to breath in order to demonstrate breath's co-determinacy in SF's blending of scientific and artistic discourses. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-12 2016-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5256420/ /pubmed/27542677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2016-010908 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Electronic pages - Science fiction and medical humanities Rose, Arthur Breath in the technoscientific imaginary |
title | Breath in the technoscientific imaginary |
title_full | Breath in the technoscientific imaginary |
title_fullStr | Breath in the technoscientific imaginary |
title_full_unstemmed | Breath in the technoscientific imaginary |
title_short | Breath in the technoscientific imaginary |
title_sort | breath in the technoscientific imaginary |
topic | Electronic pages - Science fiction and medical humanities |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27542677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2016-010908 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosearthur breathinthetechnoscientificimaginary |