Cargando…
That’s not what you said the first time: A theoretical account of the relationship between consistency and accuracy of recall
Over multiple response opportunities, recall may be inconsistent. For example, an eyewitness may report information at trial that was not reported during initial questioning—a phenomenon called reminiscence. Such inconsistencies are often assumed by lawyers to be inaccurate and are sometimes interpr...
Autores principales: | Stanley, Sarah E., Benjamin, Aaron S. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28180165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0012-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
You said what?!: the biggest communication mistakes professionals make
por: Zoller, Kim, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
“You said the hospital can't be bombed”
por: García-Mingo, Ana, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Can You Repeat What You Just Said? A Case of Unusual Hearing Loss
por: Netherton, John, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Say What Was Not Said
por: Jirsa, Viktor
Publicado: (2021) -
What the World Said
Publicado: (1879)