Cargando…

Assisted Reproductive Technology and Newborn Size in Singletons Resulting from Fresh and Cryopreserved Embryos Transfer

OBJECTIVES AND STUDY DESIGN: The aim of this study was two-fold: to investigate the association of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) and small newborn size, using standardized measures; and to examine within strata of fresh and cryopreserved embryos transfer, whether this association is influen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levi Dunietz, Galit, Holzman, Claudia, Zhang, Yujia, Talge, Nicole M., Li, Chenxi, Todem, David, Boulet, Sheree L., McKane, Patricia, Kissin, Dmitry M., Copeland, Glenn, Bernson, Dana, Diamond, Michael P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28114395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169869
_version_ 1782498788704780288
author Levi Dunietz, Galit
Holzman, Claudia
Zhang, Yujia
Talge, Nicole M.
Li, Chenxi
Todem, David
Boulet, Sheree L.
McKane, Patricia
Kissin, Dmitry M.
Copeland, Glenn
Bernson, Dana
Diamond, Michael P.
author_facet Levi Dunietz, Galit
Holzman, Claudia
Zhang, Yujia
Talge, Nicole M.
Li, Chenxi
Todem, David
Boulet, Sheree L.
McKane, Patricia
Kissin, Dmitry M.
Copeland, Glenn
Bernson, Dana
Diamond, Michael P.
author_sort Levi Dunietz, Galit
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES AND STUDY DESIGN: The aim of this study was two-fold: to investigate the association of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) and small newborn size, using standardized measures; and to examine within strata of fresh and cryopreserved embryos transfer, whether this association is influenced by parental infertility diagnoses. We used a population-based retrospective cohort from Michigan (2000–2009), Florida and Massachusetts (2000–2010). Our sample included 28,946 ART singletons conceived with non-donor oocytes and 4,263,846 non-ART singletons. METHODS: Regression models were used to examine the association of ART and newborn size, measured as small for gestational age (SGA) and birth-weight-z-score, among four mutually exclusive infertility groups: female infertility only, male infertility only, combined female and male infertility, and unexplained infertility, stratified by fresh and cryopreserved embryos transfer. RESULTS: We found increased SGA odds among ART singletons from fresh embryos transfer compared with non-ART singletons, with little difference by infertility source [adjusted odds-ratio for SGA among female infertility only: 1.18 (95% CI 1.10, 1.26), male infertility only: 1.20 (95% CI 1.10, 1.32), male and female infertility: 1.18 (95% CI 1.06, 1.31) and unexplained infertility: 1.24 (95% CI 1.10, 1.38)]. Conversely, ART singletons, born following cryopreserved embryos transfer, had lower SGA odds compared with non-ART singletons, with mild variation by infertility source [adjusted odds-ratio for SGA among female infertility only: 0.56 (95% CI 0.45, 0.71), male infertility only: 0.64 (95% CI 0.47, 0.86), male and female infertility: 0.52 (95% CI 0.36, 0.77) and unexplained infertility: 0.71 (95% CI 0.47, 1.06)]. Birth-weight-z-score was significantly lower for ART singletons born following fresh embryos transfer than non-ART singletons, regardless of infertility diagnoses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5256964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52569642017-02-06 Assisted Reproductive Technology and Newborn Size in Singletons Resulting from Fresh and Cryopreserved Embryos Transfer Levi Dunietz, Galit Holzman, Claudia Zhang, Yujia Talge, Nicole M. Li, Chenxi Todem, David Boulet, Sheree L. McKane, Patricia Kissin, Dmitry M. Copeland, Glenn Bernson, Dana Diamond, Michael P. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES AND STUDY DESIGN: The aim of this study was two-fold: to investigate the association of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) and small newborn size, using standardized measures; and to examine within strata of fresh and cryopreserved embryos transfer, whether this association is influenced by parental infertility diagnoses. We used a population-based retrospective cohort from Michigan (2000–2009), Florida and Massachusetts (2000–2010). Our sample included 28,946 ART singletons conceived with non-donor oocytes and 4,263,846 non-ART singletons. METHODS: Regression models were used to examine the association of ART and newborn size, measured as small for gestational age (SGA) and birth-weight-z-score, among four mutually exclusive infertility groups: female infertility only, male infertility only, combined female and male infertility, and unexplained infertility, stratified by fresh and cryopreserved embryos transfer. RESULTS: We found increased SGA odds among ART singletons from fresh embryos transfer compared with non-ART singletons, with little difference by infertility source [adjusted odds-ratio for SGA among female infertility only: 1.18 (95% CI 1.10, 1.26), male infertility only: 1.20 (95% CI 1.10, 1.32), male and female infertility: 1.18 (95% CI 1.06, 1.31) and unexplained infertility: 1.24 (95% CI 1.10, 1.38)]. Conversely, ART singletons, born following cryopreserved embryos transfer, had lower SGA odds compared with non-ART singletons, with mild variation by infertility source [adjusted odds-ratio for SGA among female infertility only: 0.56 (95% CI 0.45, 0.71), male infertility only: 0.64 (95% CI 0.47, 0.86), male and female infertility: 0.52 (95% CI 0.36, 0.77) and unexplained infertility: 0.71 (95% CI 0.47, 1.06)]. Birth-weight-z-score was significantly lower for ART singletons born following fresh embryos transfer than non-ART singletons, regardless of infertility diagnoses. Public Library of Science 2017-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5256964/ /pubmed/28114395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169869 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Levi Dunietz, Galit
Holzman, Claudia
Zhang, Yujia
Talge, Nicole M.
Li, Chenxi
Todem, David
Boulet, Sheree L.
McKane, Patricia
Kissin, Dmitry M.
Copeland, Glenn
Bernson, Dana
Diamond, Michael P.
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Newborn Size in Singletons Resulting from Fresh and Cryopreserved Embryos Transfer
title Assisted Reproductive Technology and Newborn Size in Singletons Resulting from Fresh and Cryopreserved Embryos Transfer
title_full Assisted Reproductive Technology and Newborn Size in Singletons Resulting from Fresh and Cryopreserved Embryos Transfer
title_fullStr Assisted Reproductive Technology and Newborn Size in Singletons Resulting from Fresh and Cryopreserved Embryos Transfer
title_full_unstemmed Assisted Reproductive Technology and Newborn Size in Singletons Resulting from Fresh and Cryopreserved Embryos Transfer
title_short Assisted Reproductive Technology and Newborn Size in Singletons Resulting from Fresh and Cryopreserved Embryos Transfer
title_sort assisted reproductive technology and newborn size in singletons resulting from fresh and cryopreserved embryos transfer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28114395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169869
work_keys_str_mv AT levidunietzgalit assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer
AT holzmanclaudia assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer
AT zhangyujia assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer
AT talgenicolem assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer
AT lichenxi assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer
AT todemdavid assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer
AT bouletshereel assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer
AT mckanepatricia assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer
AT kissindmitrym assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer
AT copelandglenn assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer
AT bernsondana assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer
AT diamondmichaelp assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer