Cargando…
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Newborn Size in Singletons Resulting from Fresh and Cryopreserved Embryos Transfer
OBJECTIVES AND STUDY DESIGN: The aim of this study was two-fold: to investigate the association of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) and small newborn size, using standardized measures; and to examine within strata of fresh and cryopreserved embryos transfer, whether this association is influen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28114395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169869 |
_version_ | 1782498788704780288 |
---|---|
author | Levi Dunietz, Galit Holzman, Claudia Zhang, Yujia Talge, Nicole M. Li, Chenxi Todem, David Boulet, Sheree L. McKane, Patricia Kissin, Dmitry M. Copeland, Glenn Bernson, Dana Diamond, Michael P. |
author_facet | Levi Dunietz, Galit Holzman, Claudia Zhang, Yujia Talge, Nicole M. Li, Chenxi Todem, David Boulet, Sheree L. McKane, Patricia Kissin, Dmitry M. Copeland, Glenn Bernson, Dana Diamond, Michael P. |
author_sort | Levi Dunietz, Galit |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES AND STUDY DESIGN: The aim of this study was two-fold: to investigate the association of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) and small newborn size, using standardized measures; and to examine within strata of fresh and cryopreserved embryos transfer, whether this association is influenced by parental infertility diagnoses. We used a population-based retrospective cohort from Michigan (2000–2009), Florida and Massachusetts (2000–2010). Our sample included 28,946 ART singletons conceived with non-donor oocytes and 4,263,846 non-ART singletons. METHODS: Regression models were used to examine the association of ART and newborn size, measured as small for gestational age (SGA) and birth-weight-z-score, among four mutually exclusive infertility groups: female infertility only, male infertility only, combined female and male infertility, and unexplained infertility, stratified by fresh and cryopreserved embryos transfer. RESULTS: We found increased SGA odds among ART singletons from fresh embryos transfer compared with non-ART singletons, with little difference by infertility source [adjusted odds-ratio for SGA among female infertility only: 1.18 (95% CI 1.10, 1.26), male infertility only: 1.20 (95% CI 1.10, 1.32), male and female infertility: 1.18 (95% CI 1.06, 1.31) and unexplained infertility: 1.24 (95% CI 1.10, 1.38)]. Conversely, ART singletons, born following cryopreserved embryos transfer, had lower SGA odds compared with non-ART singletons, with mild variation by infertility source [adjusted odds-ratio for SGA among female infertility only: 0.56 (95% CI 0.45, 0.71), male infertility only: 0.64 (95% CI 0.47, 0.86), male and female infertility: 0.52 (95% CI 0.36, 0.77) and unexplained infertility: 0.71 (95% CI 0.47, 1.06)]. Birth-weight-z-score was significantly lower for ART singletons born following fresh embryos transfer than non-ART singletons, regardless of infertility diagnoses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5256964 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52569642017-02-06 Assisted Reproductive Technology and Newborn Size in Singletons Resulting from Fresh and Cryopreserved Embryos Transfer Levi Dunietz, Galit Holzman, Claudia Zhang, Yujia Talge, Nicole M. Li, Chenxi Todem, David Boulet, Sheree L. McKane, Patricia Kissin, Dmitry M. Copeland, Glenn Bernson, Dana Diamond, Michael P. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES AND STUDY DESIGN: The aim of this study was two-fold: to investigate the association of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) and small newborn size, using standardized measures; and to examine within strata of fresh and cryopreserved embryos transfer, whether this association is influenced by parental infertility diagnoses. We used a population-based retrospective cohort from Michigan (2000–2009), Florida and Massachusetts (2000–2010). Our sample included 28,946 ART singletons conceived with non-donor oocytes and 4,263,846 non-ART singletons. METHODS: Regression models were used to examine the association of ART and newborn size, measured as small for gestational age (SGA) and birth-weight-z-score, among four mutually exclusive infertility groups: female infertility only, male infertility only, combined female and male infertility, and unexplained infertility, stratified by fresh and cryopreserved embryos transfer. RESULTS: We found increased SGA odds among ART singletons from fresh embryos transfer compared with non-ART singletons, with little difference by infertility source [adjusted odds-ratio for SGA among female infertility only: 1.18 (95% CI 1.10, 1.26), male infertility only: 1.20 (95% CI 1.10, 1.32), male and female infertility: 1.18 (95% CI 1.06, 1.31) and unexplained infertility: 1.24 (95% CI 1.10, 1.38)]. Conversely, ART singletons, born following cryopreserved embryos transfer, had lower SGA odds compared with non-ART singletons, with mild variation by infertility source [adjusted odds-ratio for SGA among female infertility only: 0.56 (95% CI 0.45, 0.71), male infertility only: 0.64 (95% CI 0.47, 0.86), male and female infertility: 0.52 (95% CI 0.36, 0.77) and unexplained infertility: 0.71 (95% CI 0.47, 1.06)]. Birth-weight-z-score was significantly lower for ART singletons born following fresh embryos transfer than non-ART singletons, regardless of infertility diagnoses. Public Library of Science 2017-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5256964/ /pubmed/28114395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169869 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Levi Dunietz, Galit Holzman, Claudia Zhang, Yujia Talge, Nicole M. Li, Chenxi Todem, David Boulet, Sheree L. McKane, Patricia Kissin, Dmitry M. Copeland, Glenn Bernson, Dana Diamond, Michael P. Assisted Reproductive Technology and Newborn Size in Singletons Resulting from Fresh and Cryopreserved Embryos Transfer |
title | Assisted Reproductive Technology and Newborn Size in Singletons Resulting from Fresh and Cryopreserved Embryos Transfer |
title_full | Assisted Reproductive Technology and Newborn Size in Singletons Resulting from Fresh and Cryopreserved Embryos Transfer |
title_fullStr | Assisted Reproductive Technology and Newborn Size in Singletons Resulting from Fresh and Cryopreserved Embryos Transfer |
title_full_unstemmed | Assisted Reproductive Technology and Newborn Size in Singletons Resulting from Fresh and Cryopreserved Embryos Transfer |
title_short | Assisted Reproductive Technology and Newborn Size in Singletons Resulting from Fresh and Cryopreserved Embryos Transfer |
title_sort | assisted reproductive technology and newborn size in singletons resulting from fresh and cryopreserved embryos transfer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28114395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169869 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT levidunietzgalit assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer AT holzmanclaudia assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer AT zhangyujia assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer AT talgenicolem assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer AT lichenxi assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer AT todemdavid assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer AT bouletshereel assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer AT mckanepatricia assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer AT kissindmitrym assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer AT copelandglenn assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer AT bernsondana assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer AT diamondmichaelp assistedreproductivetechnologyandnewbornsizeinsingletonsresultingfromfreshandcryopreservedembryostransfer |