Cargando…
Categorization of Natural Whistled Vowels by Naïve Listeners of Different Language Background
Whistled speech in a non-tonal language consists of the natural emulation of vocalic and consonantal qualities in a simple modulated whistled signal. This special speech register represents a natural telecommunication system that enables high levels of sentence intelligibility by trained speakers an...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5258750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28174545 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00025 |
_version_ | 1782499087329787904 |
---|---|
author | Meyer, Julien Dentel, Laure Meunier, Fanny |
author_facet | Meyer, Julien Dentel, Laure Meunier, Fanny |
author_sort | Meyer, Julien |
collection | PubMed |
description | Whistled speech in a non-tonal language consists of the natural emulation of vocalic and consonantal qualities in a simple modulated whistled signal. This special speech register represents a natural telecommunication system that enables high levels of sentence intelligibility by trained speakers and is not directly intelligible to naïve listeners. Yet, it is easily learned by speakers of the language that is being whistled, as attested by the current efforts of the revitalization of whistled Spanish in the Canary Islands. To better understand the relation between whistled and spoken speech perception, we look herein at how Spanish, French, and Standard Chinese native speakers, knowing nothing about whistled speech, categorized four Spanish whistled vowels. The results show that the listeners categorized differently depending on their native language. The Standard Chinese speakers demonstrated the worst performance on this task but were still able to associate a tonal whistle to vowel categories. Spanish speakers were the most accurate, and both Spanish and French participants were able to categorize the four vowels, although not as accurately as an expert whistler. These results attest that whistled speech can be used as a natural laboratory to test the perceptual processes of language. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5258750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52587502017-02-07 Categorization of Natural Whistled Vowels by Naïve Listeners of Different Language Background Meyer, Julien Dentel, Laure Meunier, Fanny Front Psychol Psychology Whistled speech in a non-tonal language consists of the natural emulation of vocalic and consonantal qualities in a simple modulated whistled signal. This special speech register represents a natural telecommunication system that enables high levels of sentence intelligibility by trained speakers and is not directly intelligible to naïve listeners. Yet, it is easily learned by speakers of the language that is being whistled, as attested by the current efforts of the revitalization of whistled Spanish in the Canary Islands. To better understand the relation between whistled and spoken speech perception, we look herein at how Spanish, French, and Standard Chinese native speakers, knowing nothing about whistled speech, categorized four Spanish whistled vowels. The results show that the listeners categorized differently depending on their native language. The Standard Chinese speakers demonstrated the worst performance on this task but were still able to associate a tonal whistle to vowel categories. Spanish speakers were the most accurate, and both Spanish and French participants were able to categorize the four vowels, although not as accurately as an expert whistler. These results attest that whistled speech can be used as a natural laboratory to test the perceptual processes of language. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5258750/ /pubmed/28174545 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00025 Text en Copyright © 2017 Meyer, Dentel and Meunier. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Meyer, Julien Dentel, Laure Meunier, Fanny Categorization of Natural Whistled Vowels by Naïve Listeners of Different Language Background |
title | Categorization of Natural Whistled Vowels by Naïve Listeners of Different Language Background |
title_full | Categorization of Natural Whistled Vowels by Naïve Listeners of Different Language Background |
title_fullStr | Categorization of Natural Whistled Vowels by Naïve Listeners of Different Language Background |
title_full_unstemmed | Categorization of Natural Whistled Vowels by Naïve Listeners of Different Language Background |
title_short | Categorization of Natural Whistled Vowels by Naïve Listeners of Different Language Background |
title_sort | categorization of natural whistled vowels by naïve listeners of different language background |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5258750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28174545 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meyerjulien categorizationofnaturalwhistledvowelsbynaivelistenersofdifferentlanguagebackground AT dentellaure categorizationofnaturalwhistledvowelsbynaivelistenersofdifferentlanguagebackground AT meunierfanny categorizationofnaturalwhistledvowelsbynaivelistenersofdifferentlanguagebackground |