Cargando…

Body size and vocalization in primates and carnivores

A fundamental assumption in bioacoustics is that large animals tend to produce vocalizations with lower frequencies than small animals. This inverse relationship between body size and vocalization frequencies is widely considered to be foundational in animal communication, with prominent theories ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowling, D. L., Garcia, M., Dunn, J. C., Ruprecht, R., Stewart, A., Frommolt, K.-H., Fitch, W. T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5259760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28117380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41070
_version_ 1782499268647452672
author Bowling, D. L.
Garcia, M.
Dunn, J. C.
Ruprecht, R.
Stewart, A.
Frommolt, K.-H.
Fitch, W. T.
author_facet Bowling, D. L.
Garcia, M.
Dunn, J. C.
Ruprecht, R.
Stewart, A.
Frommolt, K.-H.
Fitch, W. T.
author_sort Bowling, D. L.
collection PubMed
description A fundamental assumption in bioacoustics is that large animals tend to produce vocalizations with lower frequencies than small animals. This inverse relationship between body size and vocalization frequencies is widely considered to be foundational in animal communication, with prominent theories arguing that it played a critical role in the evolution of vocal communication, in both production and perception. A major shortcoming of these theories is that they lack a solid empirical foundation: rigorous comparisons between body size and vocalization frequencies remain scarce, particularly among mammals. We address this issue here in a study of body size and vocalization frequencies conducted across 91 mammalian species, covering most of the size range in the orders Primates (n = 50; ~0.11–120 Kg) and Carnivora (n = 41; ~0.14–250 Kg). We employed a novel procedure designed to capture spectral variability and standardize frequency measurement of vocalization data across species. The results unequivocally demonstrate strong inverse relationships between body size and vocalization frequencies in primates and carnivores, filling a long-standing gap in mammalian bioacoustics and providing an empirical foundation for theories on the adaptive function of call frequency in animal communication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5259760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52597602017-01-25 Body size and vocalization in primates and carnivores Bowling, D. L. Garcia, M. Dunn, J. C. Ruprecht, R. Stewart, A. Frommolt, K.-H. Fitch, W. T. Sci Rep Article A fundamental assumption in bioacoustics is that large animals tend to produce vocalizations with lower frequencies than small animals. This inverse relationship between body size and vocalization frequencies is widely considered to be foundational in animal communication, with prominent theories arguing that it played a critical role in the evolution of vocal communication, in both production and perception. A major shortcoming of these theories is that they lack a solid empirical foundation: rigorous comparisons between body size and vocalization frequencies remain scarce, particularly among mammals. We address this issue here in a study of body size and vocalization frequencies conducted across 91 mammalian species, covering most of the size range in the orders Primates (n = 50; ~0.11–120 Kg) and Carnivora (n = 41; ~0.14–250 Kg). We employed a novel procedure designed to capture spectral variability and standardize frequency measurement of vocalization data across species. The results unequivocally demonstrate strong inverse relationships between body size and vocalization frequencies in primates and carnivores, filling a long-standing gap in mammalian bioacoustics and providing an empirical foundation for theories on the adaptive function of call frequency in animal communication. Nature Publishing Group 2017-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5259760/ /pubmed/28117380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41070 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Bowling, D. L.
Garcia, M.
Dunn, J. C.
Ruprecht, R.
Stewart, A.
Frommolt, K.-H.
Fitch, W. T.
Body size and vocalization in primates and carnivores
title Body size and vocalization in primates and carnivores
title_full Body size and vocalization in primates and carnivores
title_fullStr Body size and vocalization in primates and carnivores
title_full_unstemmed Body size and vocalization in primates and carnivores
title_short Body size and vocalization in primates and carnivores
title_sort body size and vocalization in primates and carnivores
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5259760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28117380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41070
work_keys_str_mv AT bowlingdl bodysizeandvocalizationinprimatesandcarnivores
AT garciam bodysizeandvocalizationinprimatesandcarnivores
AT dunnjc bodysizeandvocalizationinprimatesandcarnivores
AT ruprechtr bodysizeandvocalizationinprimatesandcarnivores
AT stewarta bodysizeandvocalizationinprimatesandcarnivores
AT frommoltkh bodysizeandvocalizationinprimatesandcarnivores
AT fitchwt bodysizeandvocalizationinprimatesandcarnivores