Cargando…

The risk of stanford type-A aortic dissection with different tear size and location: a numerical study

BACKGROUND: This study is to investigate the influence of hemodynamics on Stanford type-A aortic dissection with different tear size and location, to provide some support for the relationships between the risks (rupture, reverse tearing and further tearing) and tear size and location for clinical tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Yue, Zhu, Minjia, Chang, Yu, Qiao, Huanyu, Liu, Yongmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5259983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28155679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0258-y
_version_ 1782499317151432704
author Shi, Yue
Zhu, Minjia
Chang, Yu
Qiao, Huanyu
Liu, Yongmin
author_facet Shi, Yue
Zhu, Minjia
Chang, Yu
Qiao, Huanyu
Liu, Yongmin
author_sort Shi, Yue
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study is to investigate the influence of hemodynamics on Stanford type-A aortic dissection with different tear size and location, to provide some support for the relationships between the risks (rupture, reverse tearing and further tearing) and tear size and location for clinical treatment. METHODS: Four numerical models of Stanford type-A aortic dissection were established, with different size and location of the tears. The ratio of the area between the entry and re-entry tears(RA) is various within the model; while, the size and the location of the re-entry in the distal descending aorta are fixed. In model A11 and A21, the entry tears are located near the ascending aorta. The RA in these models are 1 and 2, respectively; In the model B11 and B21, the entry tears are located near the proximal descending aorta and the RA in these models are again assigned to 1 and 2, respectively. Then hemodynamics in these models was solved with numerically and the flow patterns and loading distributions were investigated. RESULTS: The flow velocity of the true lumen in model A21, B21 is lower than that in A11, B11, respectively; the time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) of the false lumen in model A21 and B21 is higher, and for ascending aorta false lumen, A11, A21 are higher than B11, B21, respectively. False lumen intimal wall pressure of A11, A21 are always higher than the true lumen ones. CONCLUSION: The variation of the RA can significantly affect the dynamics of blood within the aortic dissection. When the entry tear size is larger than the re-entry tear ones, the false lumen, proximal descending aorta and the wall near re-entry tear are prone to cracking. Entry tear location can significantly alter the hemodynamics of aortic dissection as well. When entry tear location is closer to proximal ascending aorta, false lumen continues to expand and compress the true lumen resulting in the true lumen reduction. For proximal ascending aorta, high pressure in false lumen predicts a higher risk of reverse tear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5259983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52599832017-01-26 The risk of stanford type-A aortic dissection with different tear size and location: a numerical study Shi, Yue Zhu, Minjia Chang, Yu Qiao, Huanyu Liu, Yongmin Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: This study is to investigate the influence of hemodynamics on Stanford type-A aortic dissection with different tear size and location, to provide some support for the relationships between the risks (rupture, reverse tearing and further tearing) and tear size and location for clinical treatment. METHODS: Four numerical models of Stanford type-A aortic dissection were established, with different size and location of the tears. The ratio of the area between the entry and re-entry tears(RA) is various within the model; while, the size and the location of the re-entry in the distal descending aorta are fixed. In model A11 and A21, the entry tears are located near the ascending aorta. The RA in these models are 1 and 2, respectively; In the model B11 and B21, the entry tears are located near the proximal descending aorta and the RA in these models are again assigned to 1 and 2, respectively. Then hemodynamics in these models was solved with numerically and the flow patterns and loading distributions were investigated. RESULTS: The flow velocity of the true lumen in model A21, B21 is lower than that in A11, B11, respectively; the time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) of the false lumen in model A21 and B21 is higher, and for ascending aorta false lumen, A11, A21 are higher than B11, B21, respectively. False lumen intimal wall pressure of A11, A21 are always higher than the true lumen ones. CONCLUSION: The variation of the RA can significantly affect the dynamics of blood within the aortic dissection. When the entry tear size is larger than the re-entry tear ones, the false lumen, proximal descending aorta and the wall near re-entry tear are prone to cracking. Entry tear location can significantly alter the hemodynamics of aortic dissection as well. When entry tear location is closer to proximal ascending aorta, false lumen continues to expand and compress the true lumen resulting in the true lumen reduction. For proximal ascending aorta, high pressure in false lumen predicts a higher risk of reverse tear. BioMed Central 2016-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5259983/ /pubmed/28155679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0258-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Shi, Yue
Zhu, Minjia
Chang, Yu
Qiao, Huanyu
Liu, Yongmin
The risk of stanford type-A aortic dissection with different tear size and location: a numerical study
title The risk of stanford type-A aortic dissection with different tear size and location: a numerical study
title_full The risk of stanford type-A aortic dissection with different tear size and location: a numerical study
title_fullStr The risk of stanford type-A aortic dissection with different tear size and location: a numerical study
title_full_unstemmed The risk of stanford type-A aortic dissection with different tear size and location: a numerical study
title_short The risk of stanford type-A aortic dissection with different tear size and location: a numerical study
title_sort risk of stanford type-a aortic dissection with different tear size and location: a numerical study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5259983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28155679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0258-y
work_keys_str_mv AT shiyue theriskofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectionwithdifferenttearsizeandlocationanumericalstudy
AT zhuminjia theriskofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectionwithdifferenttearsizeandlocationanumericalstudy
AT changyu theriskofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectionwithdifferenttearsizeandlocationanumericalstudy
AT qiaohuanyu theriskofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectionwithdifferenttearsizeandlocationanumericalstudy
AT liuyongmin theriskofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectionwithdifferenttearsizeandlocationanumericalstudy
AT shiyue riskofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectionwithdifferenttearsizeandlocationanumericalstudy
AT zhuminjia riskofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectionwithdifferenttearsizeandlocationanumericalstudy
AT changyu riskofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectionwithdifferenttearsizeandlocationanumericalstudy
AT qiaohuanyu riskofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectionwithdifferenttearsizeandlocationanumericalstudy
AT liuyongmin riskofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectionwithdifferenttearsizeandlocationanumericalstudy